Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
71
SKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.61
Seasonality move
:
7.07%
Day range:
$24.01 - $26.05
52-week range:
$8.53 - $26.05
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
48.30x
Volume:
894.8K
Avg. volume:
635.1K
1-year change:
169.76%
Market cap:
$3B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.74
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKE
Skeena Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CDMNF
Canadian Manganese Co., Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NWIFF
Nuinsco Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMTSF
Sierra Metals, Inc.
|
-- | $0.02 | -- | 78.6% | -- |
|
TMC
TMC the metals co., Inc.
|
-- | -$0.05 | -- | -11.34% | $8.80 |
|
WGMCF
Winston Gold
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKE
Skeena Resources Ltd.
|
$24.44 | -- | $3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CDMNF
Canadian Manganese Co., Inc.
|
$0.0005 | -- | $73K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NWIFF
Nuinsco Resources Ltd.
|
$0.0041 | -- | $2.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SMTSF
Sierra Metals, Inc.
|
$0.83 | -- | $176.3M | 7.55x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.60x |
|
TMC
TMC the metals co., Inc.
|
$6.64 | $8.80 | $2.7B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
WGMCF
Winston Gold
|
$0.0000 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKE
Skeena Resources Ltd.
|
41.99% | 0.873 | 2.09% | 1.93x |
|
CDMNF
Canadian Manganese Co., Inc.
|
-- | -7.952 | -- | -- |
|
NWIFF
Nuinsco Resources Ltd.
|
-2.48% | -12.246 | 3.5% | 0.11x |
|
SMTSF
Sierra Metals, Inc.
|
46.71% | -0.713 | 63.04% | 0.57x |
|
TMC
TMC the metals co., Inc.
|
138.92% | 1.810 | 5.57% | 2.47x |
|
WGMCF
Winston Gold
|
-- | -5.794 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKE
Skeena Resources Ltd.
|
-$303.5K | -$10.9M | -86.75% | -112.45% | -- | -$80.5M |
|
CDMNF
Canadian Manganese Co., Inc.
|
-$10K | -$297.9K | -- | -- | -- | $5.5K |
|
NWIFF
Nuinsco Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -$56.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$42.4K |
|
SMTSF
Sierra Metals, Inc.
|
$32.4M | $21.5M | 10.32% | 17.95% | 21.56% | $7.1M |
|
TMC
TMC the metals co., Inc.
|
-$57K | -$55.4M | -716.25% | -3890.83% | -- | -$11.5M |
|
WGMCF
Winston Gold
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Skeena Resources Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SKE or CDMNF?
Canadian Manganese Co., Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.45% beat Canadian Manganese Co., Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKESkeena Resources Ltd.-- -$0.23 $105.6M CDMNFCanadian Manganese Co., Inc.-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About SKE or CDMNF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Manganese Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skeena Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Canadian Manganese Co., Inc., analysts believe Skeena Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Canadian Manganese Co., Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKESkeena Resources Ltd.0 0 0 CDMNFCanadian Manganese Co., Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SKE or CDMNF More Risky?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Manganese Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKE or CDMNF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Manganese Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skeena Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Manganese Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKE or CDMNF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Canadian Manganese Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$26.7M is lower than Canadian Manganese Co., Inc.'s net income of -$624.8K. Notably, Skeena Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canadian Manganese Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skeena Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Canadian Manganese Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKESkeena Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$26.7M CDMNFCanadian Manganese Co., Inc.-- -- -- -$624.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns SKE or NWIFF?
Nuinsco Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.45% beat Nuinsco Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKESkeena Resources Ltd.-- -$0.23 $105.6M NWIFFNuinsco Resources Ltd.-- -$0.00 -$1.7M -
What do Analysts Say About SKE or NWIFF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuinsco Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skeena Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nuinsco Resources Ltd., analysts believe Skeena Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Nuinsco Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKESkeena Resources Ltd.0 0 0 NWIFFNuinsco Resources Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SKE or NWIFF More Risky?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuinsco Resources Ltd. has a beta of -1.270, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 226.994%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKE or NWIFF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuinsco Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skeena Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuinsco Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKE or NWIFF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuinsco Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$26.7M is lower than Nuinsco Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$67.4K. Notably, Skeena Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuinsco Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skeena Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Nuinsco Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKESkeena Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$26.7M NWIFFNuinsco Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$67.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns SKE or SMTSF?
Sierra Metals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 9.23%. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.45% beat Sierra Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKESkeena Resources Ltd.-- -$0.23 $105.6M SMTSFSierra Metals, Inc.37.6% $0.04 $240.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SKE or SMTSF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sierra Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 110.72%. Given that Sierra Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Skeena Resources Ltd., analysts believe Sierra Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Skeena Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKESkeena Resources Ltd.0 0 0 SMTSFSierra Metals, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is SKE or SMTSF More Risky?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sierra Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.31%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKE or SMTSF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sierra Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skeena Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sierra Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKE or SMTSF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sierra Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $86.1M. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$26.7M is lower than Sierra Metals, Inc.'s net income of $7.9M. Notably, Skeena Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sierra Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skeena Resources Ltd. is -- versus 0.60x for Sierra Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKESkeena Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$26.7M SMTSFSierra Metals, Inc.0.60x 7.55x $86.1M $7.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SKE or TMC?
TMC the metals co., Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.45% beat TMC the metals co., Inc.'s return on equity of -3890.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKESkeena Resources Ltd.-- -$0.23 $105.6M TMCTMC the metals co., Inc.-- -$0.46 $104.4M -
What do Analysts Say About SKE or TMC?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TMC the metals co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.80 which suggests that it could grow by 32.53%. Given that TMC the metals co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Skeena Resources Ltd., analysts believe TMC the metals co., Inc. is more attractive than Skeena Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKESkeena Resources Ltd.0 0 0 TMCTMC the metals co., Inc.4 0 0 -
Is SKE or TMC More Risky?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TMC the metals co., Inc. has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.014%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKE or TMC?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TMC the metals co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skeena Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TMC the metals co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKE or TMC?
Skeena Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TMC the metals co., Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$26.7M is higher than TMC the metals co., Inc.'s net income of -$184.5M. Notably, Skeena Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TMC the metals co., Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skeena Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for TMC the metals co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKESkeena Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$26.7M TMCTMC the metals co., Inc.-- -- -- -$184.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SKE or WGMCF?
Winston Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.45% beat Winston Gold's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKESkeena Resources Ltd.-- -$0.23 $105.6M WGMCFWinston Gold-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SKE or WGMCF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Winston Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skeena Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Winston Gold, analysts believe Skeena Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Winston Gold.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKESkeena Resources Ltd.0 0 0 WGMCFWinston Gold0 0 0 -
Is SKE or WGMCF More Risky?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.352, which suggesting that the stock is 35.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winston Gold has a beta of 0.295, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.542%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKE or WGMCF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winston Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skeena Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winston Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKE or WGMCF?
Skeena Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Winston Gold quarterly revenues of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$26.7M is higher than Winston Gold's net income of --. Notably, Skeena Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Winston Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skeena Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Winston Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKESkeena Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$26.7M WGMCFWinston Gold-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
73
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FEIM alert for Dec 15
Frequency Electronics, Inc. [FEIM] is down 3.51% over the past day.
Buy
57
MOD alert for Dec 15
Modine Manufacturing Co. [MOD] is up 1.79% over the past day.
Sell
42
OKLO alert for Dec 15
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
