SAFE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eXp World Holdings has a net margin of 21.31% compared to Safehold's net margin of -0.69%. Safehold's return on equity of 5.18% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -14.35%.

Safehold has a consensus price target of $27.33, signalling upside risk potential of 49.47%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.69%. Given that Safehold has higher upside potential than eXp World Holdings, analysts believe Safehold is more attractive than eXp World Holdings.

Safehold has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 14.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.421%.

Safehold has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Safehold pays -83.75% of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -317.83% of its earnings as a dividend.

Safehold quarterly revenues are $90.7M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Safehold's net income of $19.3M is higher than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Safehold's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.73x while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safehold is 3.60x versus 0.41x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings has a net margin of 21.31% compared to Safehold's net margin of 12.8%. Safehold's return on equity of 5.18% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.68%.

Safehold has a consensus price target of $27.33, signalling upside risk potential of 49.47%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Safehold has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Safehold is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Safehold has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 14.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.496, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.4%.

Safehold has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safehold pays -83.75% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safehold quarterly revenues are $90.7M, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Safehold's net income of $19.3M is higher than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Safehold's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.73x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 75.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safehold is 3.60x versus 13.80x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 21.31% compared to Safehold's net margin of 38.73%. Safehold's return on equity of 5.18% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Safehold has a consensus price target of $27.33, signalling upside risk potential of 49.47%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $258.13 which suggests that it could grow by 26.53%. Given that Safehold has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Safehold is more attractive than SBA Communications.

Safehold has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 14.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.079%.

Safehold has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Safehold pays -83.75% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 73.73% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safehold quarterly revenues are $90.7M, which are smaller than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $667.6M. Safehold's net income of $19.3M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $258.5M. Notably, Safehold's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.73x while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 32.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safehold is 3.60x versus 8.29x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of 21.31% compared to Safehold's net margin of -2883.88%. Safehold's return on equity of 5.18% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of --.

Safehold has a consensus price target of $27.33, signalling upside risk potential of 49.47%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Safehold has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Safehold is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Safehold has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 14.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Safehold has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.73%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safehold pays -83.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safehold quarterly revenues are $90.7M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $81.2K. Safehold's net income of $19.3M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Safehold's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.73x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safehold is 3.60x versus -- for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.