RJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 14.74%. Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.03% beat The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.82%.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $184.83, signalling upside risk potential of 15.75%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $959.20 which suggests that it could grow by 3.25%. Given that Raymond James Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., analysts believe Raymond James Financial, Inc. is more attractive than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc..

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.13799999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.946%.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.00 per share. Raymond James Financial, Inc. pays 19.43% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. pays out 27.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $31.3B. Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s net income of $562M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s net income of $4.6B. Notably, Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.63x while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial, Inc. is 2.03x versus 2.34x for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 6.1%. Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.03% beat LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.06%.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $184.83, signalling upside risk potential of 15.75%. On the other hand LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $455.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.39%. Given that LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Raymond James Financial, Inc., analysts believe LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Raymond James Financial, Inc..

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.13799999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.580, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.024%.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Raymond James Financial, Inc. pays 19.43% of its earnings as a dividend. LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. pays out 10.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s net income of $562M is higher than LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $300.7M. Notably, Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.63x while LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial, Inc. is 2.03x versus 1.49x for LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 14.75%. Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.03% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 15.58%.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $184.83, signalling upside risk potential of 15.75%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $195.52 which suggests that it could grow by 10.16%. Given that Raymond James Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Raymond James Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.13799999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.832%.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Raymond James Financial, Inc. pays 19.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 37.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $30B. Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s net income of $562M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.4B. Notably, Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.63x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 17.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial, Inc. is 2.03x versus 2.36x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 34.31%. Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.03% beat The Charles Schwab Corp.'s return on equity of 17.98%.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $184.83, signalling upside risk potential of 15.75%. On the other hand The Charles Schwab Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $121.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.08%. Given that The Charles Schwab Corp. has higher upside potential than Raymond James Financial, Inc., analysts believe The Charles Schwab Corp. is more attractive than Raymond James Financial, Inc..

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.13799999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Charles Schwab Corp. has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.333%.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. The Charles Schwab Corp. offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Raymond James Financial, Inc. pays 19.43% of its earnings as a dividend. The Charles Schwab Corp. pays out 23.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than The Charles Schwab Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s net income of $562M is lower than The Charles Schwab Corp.'s net income of $2.5B. Notably, Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.63x while The Charles Schwab Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial, Inc. is 2.03x versus 6.37x for The Charles Schwab Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.