PSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HubSpot has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Parsons's net margin of -3.05%. Parsons's return on equity of 16.94% beat HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $80.12, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $752.73 which suggests that it could grow by 35.66%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Parsons.

Parsons has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.13%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $714.1M. Parsons's net income of $66.2M is higher than HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.77x while HubSpot's PE ratio is 6,700.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.15x versus 10.65x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Parsons's net margin of -17.13%. Parsons's return on equity of 16.94% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $80.12, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 57.9%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Parsons.

Parsons has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.506%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Parsons's net income of $66.2M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.77x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.15x versus 2.57x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Science Applications International has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Parsons's net margin of 3.62%. Parsons's return on equity of 16.94% beat Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.85%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $80.12, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand Science Applications International has an analysts' consensus of $120.41 which suggests that it could grow by 14.68%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Parsons has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Science Applications International has a beta of 0.503, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.748%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Science Applications International offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Science Applications International quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Parsons's net income of $66.2M is lower than Science Applications International's net income of $68M. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.77x while Science Applications International's PE ratio is 14.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.15x versus 0.69x for Science Applications International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Parsons's net margin of -2.12%. Parsons's return on equity of 16.94% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $80.12, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.11%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Parsons.

Parsons has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.32%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Parsons's net income of $66.2M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.77x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.15x versus 0.21x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.