PPT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackRock Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to Putnam Premier Income Trust's net margin of --. Putnam Premier Income Trust's return on equity of -- beat BlackRock Income Trust's return on equity of --.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BlackRock Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Putnam Premier Income Trust has higher upside potential than BlackRock Income Trust, analysts believe Putnam Premier Income Trust is more attractive than BlackRock Income Trust.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock Income Trust has a beta of 1.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.105%.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.81%. BlackRock Income Trust offers a yield of 9.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Putnam Premier Income Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Putnam Premier Income Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BlackRock Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. Putnam Premier Income Trust's net income of -- is lower than BlackRock Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, Putnam Premier Income Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BlackRock Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Putnam Premier Income Trust is -- versus -- for BlackRock Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ellington Credit Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Putnam Premier Income Trust's net margin of -2415.66%. Putnam Premier Income Trust's return on equity of -- beat Ellington Credit Co.'s return on equity of 4.06%.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ellington Credit Co. has an analysts' consensus of $5.88 which suggests that it could grow by 5.1%. Given that Ellington Credit Co. has higher upside potential than Putnam Premier Income Trust, analysts believe Ellington Credit Co. is more attractive than Putnam Premier Income Trust.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ellington Credit Co. has a beta of 2.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.291%.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.81%. Ellington Credit Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Putnam Premier Income Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ellington Credit Co. pays out 343.72% of its earnings as a dividend.

Putnam Premier Income Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ellington Credit Co. quarterly revenues of $83K. Putnam Premier Income Trust's net income of -- is lower than Ellington Credit Co.'s net income of -$2M. Notably, Putnam Premier Income Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ellington Credit Co.'s PE ratio is 18.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Putnam Premier Income Trust is -- versus 8.22x for Ellington Credit Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to Putnam Premier Income Trust's net margin of --. Putnam Premier Income Trust's return on equity of -- beat Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity of --.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Putnam Premier Income Trust has higher upside potential than Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust, analysts believe Putnam Premier Income Trust is more attractive than Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.162%.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.81%. Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust offers a yield of 7.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Putnam Premier Income Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Putnam Premier Income Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. Putnam Premier Income Trust's net income of -- is lower than Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, Putnam Premier Income Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Putnam Premier Income Trust is -- versus -- for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Putnam Premier Income Trust's net margin of --. Putnam Premier Income Trust's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF's return on equity of --.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Putnam Premier Income Trust has higher upside potential than ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF, analysts believe Putnam Premier Income Trust is more attractive than ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF has a beta of -0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 181.486%.

Putnam Premier Income Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.81%. ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Putnam Premier Income Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Putnam Premier Income Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF quarterly revenues of --. Putnam Premier Income Trust's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF's net income of --. Notably, Putnam Premier Income Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Putnam Premier Income Trust is -- versus -- for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.