Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
36
PCQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.08
Seasonality move
:
-1.22%
Day range:
$9.04 - $9.12
52-week range:
$8.75 - $10.24
Dividend yield:
3.23%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
140.3K
Avg. volume:
81.1K
1-year change:
-4.02%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
$9.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 3.23% | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
$11.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 3.6% | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
$10.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 4.53% | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
$9.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 3.67% | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
$5.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 3.38% | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
$6.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 3.2% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | 0.905 | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | 1.915 | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
-- | 1.154 | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | 1.226 | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | 1.868 | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | 2.013 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PCQ or BFZ?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a net margin of -- compared to PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net margin of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCQ or BFZ?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has higher upside potential than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr, analysts believe PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is more attractive than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr0 0 0 -
Is PCQ or BFZ More Risky?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.246% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a beta of 2.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.842%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCQ or BFZ?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCQ or BFZ?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr quarterly revenues of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net income of --. Notably, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is -- versus -- for Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -- BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCQ or CEV?
Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net margin of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- CEVEaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCQ or CEV?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust, analysts believe PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 CEVEaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust0 0 0 -
Is PCQ or CEV More Risky?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.246% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust has a beta of 1.888, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.774%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCQ or CEV?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust offers a yield of 4.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCQ or CEV?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -- CEVEaton Vance CA Muni Income Trust-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCQ or EVM?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a net margin of -- compared to PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net margin of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCQ or EVM?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund, analysts believe PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund0 0 0 -
Is PCQ or EVM More Risky?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.246% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 2.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.439%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCQ or EVM?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCQ or EVM?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund quarterly revenues of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net income of --. Notably, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -- EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCQ or PCK?
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has a net margin of -- compared to PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net margin of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCQ or PCK?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II, analysts believe PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is more attractive than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II0 0 0 -
Is PCQ or PCK More Risky?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.246% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has a beta of 2.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.404%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCQ or PCK?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCQ or PCK?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II quarterly revenues of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's net income of --. Notably, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -- PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCQ or PZC?
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a net margin of -- compared to PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net margin of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCQ or PZC?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III, analysts believe PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is more attractive than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III0 0 0 -
Is PCQ or PZC More Risky?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.246% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a beta of 2.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.406%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCQ or PZC?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.23%. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCQ or PZC?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III quarterly revenues of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's net income of --. Notably, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
