NRGV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evergy has a net margin of -2217.93% compared to Energy Vault Holdings's net margin of 25.7%. Energy Vault Holdings's return on equity of -45.81% beat Evergy's return on equity of 8.72%.

Energy Vault Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.54, signalling downside risk potential of -13.97%. On the other hand Evergy has an analysts' consensus of $65.41 which suggests that it could grow by 8.04%. Given that Evergy has higher upside potential than Energy Vault Holdings, analysts believe Evergy is more attractive than Energy Vault Holdings.

Energy Vault Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evergy has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.387%.

Energy Vault Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evergy offers a yield of 4.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Energy Vault Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evergy pays out 77.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Evergy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Vault Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Evergy quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Energy Vault Holdings's net income of -$26.6M is lower than Evergy's net income of $465.6M. Notably, Energy Vault Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evergy's PE ratio is 16.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Vault Holdings is 2.79x versus 2.42x for Evergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alliant Energy has a net margin of -2217.93% compared to Energy Vault Holdings's net margin of 27.29%. Energy Vault Holdings's return on equity of -45.81% beat Alliant Energy's return on equity of 9.7%.

Energy Vault Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.54, signalling downside risk potential of -13.97%. On the other hand Alliant Energy has an analysts' consensus of $62.40 which suggests that it could grow by 8.79%. Given that Alliant Energy has higher upside potential than Energy Vault Holdings, analysts believe Alliant Energy is more attractive than Energy Vault Holdings.

Energy Vault Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.174%.

Energy Vault Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alliant Energy offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Energy Vault Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alliant Energy pays out 64.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Alliant Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Vault Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Alliant Energy quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Energy Vault Holdings's net income of -$26.6M is lower than Alliant Energy's net income of $295M. Notably, Energy Vault Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alliant Energy's PE ratio is 22.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Vault Holdings is 2.79x versus 3.71x for Alliant Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otter Tail has a net margin of -2217.93% compared to Energy Vault Holdings's net margin of 25.29%. Energy Vault Holdings's return on equity of -45.81% beat Otter Tail's return on equity of 20.19%.

Energy Vault Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.54, signalling downside risk potential of -13.97%. On the other hand Otter Tail has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.46%. Given that Otter Tail has higher upside potential than Energy Vault Holdings, analysts believe Otter Tail is more attractive than Energy Vault Holdings.

Energy Vault Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otter Tail has a beta of 0.560, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.978%.

Energy Vault Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Otter Tail offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Energy Vault Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Vault Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Otter Tail quarterly revenues of $338M. Energy Vault Holdings's net income of -$26.6M is lower than Otter Tail's net income of $85.5M. Notably, Energy Vault Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Otter Tail's PE ratio is 10.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Vault Holdings is 2.79x versus 2.32x for Otter Tail. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verde Clean Fuels has a net margin of -2217.93% compared to Energy Vault Holdings's net margin of --. Energy Vault Holdings's return on equity of -45.81% beat Verde Clean Fuels's return on equity of --.

Energy Vault Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.54, signalling downside risk potential of -13.97%. On the other hand Verde Clean Fuels has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Vault Holdings has higher upside potential than Verde Clean Fuels, analysts believe Energy Vault Holdings is more attractive than Verde Clean Fuels.

Energy Vault Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verde Clean Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Energy Vault Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verde Clean Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Vault Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verde Clean Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Vault Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are larger than Verde Clean Fuels quarterly revenues of --. Energy Vault Holdings's net income of -$26.6M is lower than Verde Clean Fuels's net income of -$777.7K. Notably, Energy Vault Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Verde Clean Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Vault Holdings is 2.79x versus -- for Verde Clean Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.