NINE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of -11.09% compared to Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s net margin of 71.5%. Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 54.64%. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Energy Service, Inc. has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe Nine Energy Service, Inc. is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a beta of 2.223, which suggesting that the stock is 122.326% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.592%.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. quarterly revenues are $132M, which are larger than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s net income of -$14.6M is lower than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service, Inc. is 0.03x versus 22.04x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Empire Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of -11.09% compared to Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s net margin of -40.95%. Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Empire Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of -30.21%.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 54.64%. On the other hand Empire Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Energy Service, Inc. has higher upside potential than Empire Petroleum Corp., analysts believe Nine Energy Service, Inc. is more attractive than Empire Petroleum Corp..

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a beta of 2.223, which suggesting that the stock is 122.326% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empire Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.625%.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Empire Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Empire Petroleum Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. quarterly revenues are $132M, which are larger than Empire Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.4M. Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s net income of -$14.6M is lower than Empire Petroleum Corp.'s net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Empire Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service, Inc. is 0.03x versus 2.84x for Empire Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sky Quarry, Inc. has a net margin of -11.09% compared to Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s net margin of -283.52%. Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Sky Quarry, Inc.'s return on equity of -157.31%.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 54.64%. On the other hand Sky Quarry, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Energy Service, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sky Quarry, Inc., analysts believe Nine Energy Service, Inc. is more attractive than Sky Quarry, Inc..

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a beta of 2.223, which suggesting that the stock is 122.326% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sky Quarry, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sky Quarry, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sky Quarry, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. quarterly revenues are $132M, which are larger than Sky Quarry, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s net income of -$14.6M is lower than Sky Quarry, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sky Quarry, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service, Inc. is 0.03x versus 0.50x for Sky Quarry, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Energy Corp. has a net margin of -11.09% compared to Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s net margin of -192.23%. Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat US Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -83.96%.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling upside risk potential of 54.64%. On the other hand US Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that US Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, Inc., analysts believe US Energy Corp. is more attractive than Nine Energy Service, Inc..

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a beta of 2.223, which suggesting that the stock is 122.326% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.460, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.953%.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Nine Energy Service, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Energy Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service, Inc. quarterly revenues are $132M, which are larger than US Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s net income of -$14.6M is lower than US Energy Corp.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while US Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service, Inc. is 0.03x versus 3.28x for US Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.