NABL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aurora Innovation, Inc. has a net margin of 1.05% compared to N-able, Inc.'s net margin of -20100%. N-able, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.83% beat Aurora Innovation, Inc.'s return on equity of -40.31%.

N-able, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.65, signalling upside risk potential of 58.98%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.79 which suggests that it could grow by 133.04%. Given that Aurora Innovation, Inc. has higher upside potential than N-able, Inc., analysts believe Aurora Innovation, Inc. is more attractive than N-able, Inc..

N-able, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

N-able, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. N-able, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

N-able, Inc. quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1M. N-able, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Aurora Innovation, Inc.'s net income of -$201M. Notably, N-able, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 535.06x while Aurora Innovation, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for N-able, Inc. is 2.30x versus 3,749.55x for Aurora Innovation, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progress Software Corp. has a net margin of 1.05% compared to N-able, Inc.'s net margin of 10.19%. N-able, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.83% beat Progress Software Corp.'s return on equity of 16.04%.

N-able, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.65, signalling upside risk potential of 58.98%. On the other hand Progress Software Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 60.07%. Given that Progress Software Corp. has higher upside potential than N-able, Inc., analysts believe Progress Software Corp. is more attractive than N-able, Inc..

N-able, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progress Software Corp. has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.362%.

N-able, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Progress Software Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. N-able, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

N-able, Inc. quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are smaller than Progress Software Corp. quarterly revenues of $252.7M. N-able, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than Progress Software Corp.'s net income of $25.7M. Notably, N-able, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 535.06x while Progress Software Corp.'s PE ratio is 24.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for N-able, Inc. is 2.30x versus 1.84x for Progress Software Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veea, Inc. has a net margin of 1.05% compared to N-able, Inc.'s net margin of -10165.84%. N-able, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.83% beat Veea, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

N-able, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.65, signalling upside risk potential of 58.98%. On the other hand Veea, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that N-able, Inc. has higher upside potential than Veea, Inc., analysts believe N-able, Inc. is more attractive than Veea, Inc..

N-able, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

N-able, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veea, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. N-able, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veea, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

N-able, Inc. quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are larger than Veea, Inc. quarterly revenues of $144.9K. N-able, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Veea, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M. Notably, N-able, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 535.06x while Veea, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for N-able, Inc. is 2.30x versus 88.08x for Veea, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility Corp. has a net margin of 1.05% compared to N-able, Inc.'s net margin of 17.88%. N-able, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.83% beat Verra Mobility Corp.'s return on equity of 14.14%.

N-able, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.65, signalling upside risk potential of 58.98%. On the other hand Verra Mobility Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $28.71 which suggests that it could grow by 48.78%. Given that N-able, Inc. has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility Corp., analysts believe N-able, Inc. is more attractive than Verra Mobility Corp..

N-able, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility Corp. has a beta of 0.587, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.285%.

N-able, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. N-able, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

N-able, Inc. quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are smaller than Verra Mobility Corp. quarterly revenues of $261.9M. N-able, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than Verra Mobility Corp.'s net income of $46.8M. Notably, N-able, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 535.06x while Verra Mobility Corp.'s PE ratio is 60.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for N-able, Inc. is 2.30x versus 3.32x for Verra Mobility Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.