NABL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of 9.24% compared to N-able's net margin of --. N-able's return on equity of 5.16% beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

N-able has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.83%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9051.92%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than N-able, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than N-able.

N-able has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

N-able has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. N-able pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

N-able quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are larger than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of --. N-able's net income of $10.8M is higher than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of --. Notably, N-able's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.75x while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for N-able is 3.91x versus -- for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 9.24% compared to N-able's net margin of --. N-able's return on equity of 5.16% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

N-able has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.83%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -23.38%. Given that N-able has higher upside potential than Aurora Innovation, analysts believe N-able is more attractive than Aurora Innovation.

N-able has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

N-able has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. N-able pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

N-able quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. N-able's net income of $10.8M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, N-able's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.75x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for N-able is 3.91x versus 160.98x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 9.24% compared to N-able's net margin of 5.04%. N-able's return on equity of 5.16% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 7.51%.

N-able has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.83%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23%. Given that N-able has higher upside potential than Cantaloupe, analysts believe N-able is more attractive than Cantaloupe.

N-able has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.659, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.884%.

N-able has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. N-able pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

N-able quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $70.8M. N-able's net income of $10.8M is higher than Cantaloupe's net income of $3.6M. Notably, N-able's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.75x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 55.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for N-able is 3.91x versus 2.50x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veea has a net margin of 9.24% compared to N-able's net margin of -65748.98%. N-able's return on equity of 5.16% beat Veea's return on equity of --.

N-able has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.83%. On the other hand Veea has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that N-able has higher upside potential than Veea, analysts believe N-able is more attractive than Veea.

N-able has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

N-able has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. N-able pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

N-able quarterly revenues are $116.4M, which are larger than Veea quarterly revenues of $50.7K. N-able's net income of $10.8M is higher than Veea's net income of -$33.3M. Notably, N-able's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.75x while Veea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for N-able is 3.91x versus -- for Veea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.