Why Is Intel Struggling Against AMD?
Due to its disappointing reports, so-so management, and lack of…
Sell
37
MUC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.24
Seasonality move
:
0.47%
Day range:
$10.17 - $10.28
52-week range:
$9.97 - $11.64
Dividend yield:
6.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
156.3K
Avg. volume:
268.9K
1-year change:
-4.03%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
$10.24 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 6.03% | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
$10.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 6.74% | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
$10.54 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 8.14% | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
$8.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 4.21% | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
$11.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 7.52% | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
$6.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 5.76% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | 2.390 | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | 1.660 | -- | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | 1.908 | -- | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
-- | 1.002 | -- | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | 1.987 | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | 2.274 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MUC or BFZ?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a net margin of -- compared to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net margin of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of -- beat Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUC or BFZ?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher upside potential than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr, analysts believe BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is more attractive than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr0 0 0 -
Is MUC or BFZ More Risky?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.332, which suggesting that the stock is 133.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.994%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUC or BFZ?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr offers a yield of 6.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUC or BFZ?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr quarterly revenues of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of -- is lower than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net income of --. Notably, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is -- versus -- for Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -- BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUC or NAC?
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net margin of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- NACNuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUC or NAC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher upside potential than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund, analysts believe BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is more attractive than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 NACNuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is MUC or NAC More Risky?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.332, which suggesting that the stock is 133.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 2.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.346%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUC or NAC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund offers a yield of 8.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUC or NAC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is -- versus -- for Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -- NACNuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUC or NCA?
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund has a net margin of -- compared to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net margin of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- NCANuveen California Municipal Value Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUC or NCA?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher upside potential than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund, analysts believe BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is more attractive than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 NCANuveen California Municipal Value Fund0 0 0 -
Is MUC or NCA More Risky?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.332, which suggesting that the stock is 133.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.109%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUC or NCA?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund offers a yield of 4.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUC or NCA?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund quarterly revenues of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund's net income of --. Notably, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is -- versus -- for Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -- NCANuveen California Municipal Value Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUC or NKX?
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net margin of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- NKXNuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUC or NKX?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher upside potential than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, analysts believe BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is more attractive than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 NKXNuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is MUC or NKX More Risky?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.332, which suggesting that the stock is 133.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 2.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.607%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUC or NKX?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund offers a yield of 7.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUC or NKX?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is -- versus -- for Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -- NKXNuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUC or PZC?
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a net margin of -- compared to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net margin of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUC or PZC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III, analysts believe BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is more attractive than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III0 0 0 -
Is MUC or PZC More Risky?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.332, which suggesting that the stock is 133.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.954%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUC or PZC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III offers a yield of 5.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUC or PZC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III quarterly revenues of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's net income of --. Notably, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will PayPal Stock Recover or Keep Sliding?
Payments platform behemoth PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL) is going through…
How High Will Eli Lilly Stock Go By 2030?
The weight loss drugs market is heating up quickly and…
Stock Ideas
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
47
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.4T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Alerts
Buy
56
ROOT alert for Apr 23
Root [ROOT] is up 9.37% over the past day.
Buy
72
EFX alert for Apr 23
Equifax [EFX] is up 1.69% over the past day.
Buy
51
CALX alert for Apr 23
Calix [CALX] is down 1.81% over the past day.
