Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
47
MUC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.57
Seasonality move
:
-1.3%
Day range:
$10.54 - $10.60
52-week range:
$9.97 - $11.20
Dividend yield:
6.07%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
305.9K
Avg. volume:
352.8K
1-year change:
-0.28%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
$10.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 6.07% | -- |
|
BFZ
BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust
|
$10.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 6.5% | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
|
$10.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 5.94% | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
$9.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 5.29% | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
$11.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 7.49% | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
$12.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 7.32% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | 2.539 | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust
|
-- | 2.042 | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
|
-- | 2.543 | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | 1.592 | -- | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | 1.941 | -- | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | 2.250 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEV
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MUC or BFZ?
BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net margin of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of -- beat BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- BFZBlackRock California Municipal Income Trust-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUC or BFZ?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher upside potential than BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust, analysts believe BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is more attractive than BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 BFZBlackRock California Municipal Income Trust0 0 0 -
Is MUC or BFZ More Risky?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.297, which suggesting that the stock is 129.734% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust has a beta of 2.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.202%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUC or BFZ?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust offers a yield of 6.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUC or BFZ?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of -- is lower than BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is -- versus -- for BlackRock California Municipal Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -- BFZBlackRock California Municipal Income Trust-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUC or CEV?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net margin of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- CEVEaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUC or CEV?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust, analysts believe BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 CEVEaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust0 0 0 -
Is MUC or CEV More Risky?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.297, which suggesting that the stock is 129.734% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has a beta of 2.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.953%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUC or CEV?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust offers a yield of 5.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUC or CEV?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -- CEVEaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUC or EVM?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a net margin of -- compared to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net margin of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUC or EVM?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund, analysts believe BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund0 0 0 -
Is MUC or EVM More Risky?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.297, which suggesting that the stock is 129.734% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 2.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.595%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUC or EVM?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund offers a yield of 5.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUC or EVM?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund quarterly revenues of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net income of --. Notably, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -- EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUC or NAC?
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net margin of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- NACNuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUC or NAC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher upside potential than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund, analysts believe BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is more attractive than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 NACNuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is MUC or NAC More Risky?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.297, which suggesting that the stock is 129.734% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 2.038, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.782%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUC or NAC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund offers a yield of 7.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUC or NAC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is -- versus -- for Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -- NACNuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUC or NKX?
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net margin of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- NKXNuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUC or NKX?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher upside potential than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, analysts believe BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is more attractive than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 NKXNuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is MUC or NKX More Risky?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.297, which suggesting that the stock is 129.734% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 2.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.894%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUC or NKX?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund offers a yield of 7.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUC or NKX?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is -- versus -- for Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -- NKXNuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
