MSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

QXO, Inc. has a net margin of 5.29% compared to MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s net margin of -5.11%. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.72% beat QXO, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.55%.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $85.83, signalling downside risk potential of -8.55%. On the other hand QXO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.1333 which suggests that it could grow by 25.82%. Given that QXO, Inc. has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., analysts believe QXO, Inc. is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc..

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison QXO, Inc. has a beta of 2.530, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.994%.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.67%. QXO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $26.16 per share. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. pays 95.34% of its earnings as a dividend. QXO, Inc. pays out -177.52% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $965.7M, which are smaller than QXO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s net income of $51.1M is higher than QXO, Inc.'s net income of -$139.4M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.64x while QXO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. is 1.38x versus 2.99x for QXO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resideo Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 5.29% compared to MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s net margin of 8.37%. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.72% beat Resideo Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.79%.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $85.83, signalling downside risk potential of -8.55%. On the other hand Resideo Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.55%. Given that Resideo Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., analysts believe Resideo Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc..

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resideo Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.733, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.285%.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.67%. Resideo Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. pays 95.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Resideo Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $965.7M, which are smaller than Resideo Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s net income of $51.1M is lower than Resideo Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $156M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.64x while Resideo Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 81.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. is 1.38x versus 0.74x for Resideo Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. has a net margin of 5.29% compared to MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s net margin of -0.75%. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.72% beat SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.57%.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $85.83, signalling downside risk potential of -8.55%. On the other hand SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $175.60 which suggests that it could grow by 15.98%. Given that SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., analysts believe SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc..

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. has a beta of 1.590, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.969%.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.67%. SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. pays 95.34% of its earnings as a dividend. SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $965.7M, which are smaller than SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s net income of $51.1M is higher than SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.64x while SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. is 1.38x versus 1.45x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xometry, Inc. has a net margin of 5.29% compared to MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s net margin of -6.42%. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.72% beat Xometry, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.18%.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $85.83, signalling downside risk potential of -8.55%. On the other hand Xometry, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.44 which suggests that it could grow by 15.46%. Given that Xometry, Inc. has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., analysts believe Xometry, Inc. is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc..

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xometry, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.67%. Xometry, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. pays 95.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Xometry, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $965.7M, which are larger than Xometry, Inc. quarterly revenues of $180.7M. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s net income of $51.1M is higher than Xometry, Inc.'s net income of -$11.6M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.64x while Xometry, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. is 1.38x versus 4.44x for Xometry, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.