MSA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Iveda Solutions has a net margin of 15.4% compared to MSA Safety's net margin of -23.14%. MSA Safety's return on equity of 27.57% beat Iveda Solutions's return on equity of -60.54%.

MSA Safety has a consensus price target of $200.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Iveda Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 157.24%. Given that Iveda Solutions has higher upside potential than MSA Safety, analysts believe Iveda Solutions is more attractive than MSA Safety.

MSA Safety has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.85499999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iveda Solutions has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.23%.

MSA Safety has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Iveda Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSA Safety pays 125.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Iveda Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MSA Safety quarterly revenues are $432.7M, which are larger than Iveda Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.4M. MSA Safety's net income of $66.6M is higher than Iveda Solutions's net income of -$555K. Notably, MSA Safety's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.41x while Iveda Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSA Safety is 3.72x versus 1.19x for Iveda Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of 15.4% compared to MSA Safety's net margin of 25.42%. MSA Safety's return on equity of 27.57% beat NAPCO Security Technologies's return on equity of 30.38%.

MSA Safety has a consensus price target of $200.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand NAPCO Security Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.23%. Given that NAPCO Security Technologies has higher upside potential than MSA Safety, analysts believe NAPCO Security Technologies is more attractive than MSA Safety.

MSA Safety has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.85499999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.622, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.177%.

MSA Safety has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. NAPCO Security Technologies offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. MSA Safety pays 125.44% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies pays out 26.61% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MSA Safety's is not.

MSA Safety quarterly revenues are $432.7M, which are larger than NAPCO Security Technologies quarterly revenues of $44M. MSA Safety's net income of $66.6M is higher than NAPCO Security Technologies's net income of $11.2M. Notably, MSA Safety's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.41x while NAPCO Security Technologies's PE ratio is 26.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSA Safety is 3.72x versus 7.01x for NAPCO Security Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Security Instruments has a net margin of 15.4% compared to MSA Safety's net margin of 8.01%. MSA Safety's return on equity of 27.57% beat Universal Security Instruments's return on equity of -4.73%.

MSA Safety has a consensus price target of $200.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Universal Security Instruments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MSA Safety has higher upside potential than Universal Security Instruments, analysts believe MSA Safety is more attractive than Universal Security Instruments.

MSA Safety has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.85499999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Security Instruments has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.466%.

MSA Safety has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Universal Security Instruments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSA Safety pays 125.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Security Instruments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MSA Safety quarterly revenues are $432.7M, which are larger than Universal Security Instruments quarterly revenues of $7.2M. MSA Safety's net income of $66.6M is higher than Universal Security Instruments's net income of $577K. Notably, MSA Safety's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.41x while Universal Security Instruments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSA Safety is 3.72x versus 0.25x for Universal Security Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VerifyMe has a net margin of 15.4% compared to MSA Safety's net margin of -44.6%. MSA Safety's return on equity of 27.57% beat VerifyMe's return on equity of -27.97%.

MSA Safety has a consensus price target of $200.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand VerifyMe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 251.56%. Given that VerifyMe has higher upside potential than MSA Safety, analysts believe VerifyMe is more attractive than MSA Safety.

MSA Safety has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.85499999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VerifyMe has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.25%.

MSA Safety has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. VerifyMe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSA Safety pays 125.44% of its earnings as a dividend. VerifyMe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MSA Safety quarterly revenues are $432.7M, which are larger than VerifyMe quarterly revenues of $5.4M. MSA Safety's net income of $66.6M is higher than VerifyMe's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, MSA Safety's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.41x while VerifyMe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSA Safety is 3.72x versus 0.26x for VerifyMe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.