MPW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Regency Centers has a net margin of -52.85% compared to Medical Properties Trust's net margin of 28.77%. Medical Properties Trust's return on equity of -29.59% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.74%.

Medical Properties Trust has a consensus price target of $5.43, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $79.05 which suggests that it could grow by 10.81%. Given that Medical Properties Trust has higher upside potential than Regency Centers, analysts believe Medical Properties Trust is more attractive than Regency Centers.

Medical Properties Trust has a beta of 1.417, which suggesting that the stock is 41.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.729%.

Medical Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.69%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Medical Properties Trust pays -13.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Medical Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $223.8M, which are smaller than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $380.9M. Medical Properties Trust's net income of -$118.3M is lower than Regency Centers's net income of $109.6M. Notably, Medical Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 33.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Medical Properties Trust is 2.93x versus 8.84x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simon Property Group has a net margin of -52.85% compared to Medical Properties Trust's net margin of 28.14%. Medical Properties Trust's return on equity of -29.59% beat Simon Property Group's return on equity of 58.53%.

Medical Properties Trust has a consensus price target of $5.43, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand Simon Property Group has an analysts' consensus of $185.22 which suggests that it could grow by 17.14%. Given that Medical Properties Trust has higher upside potential than Simon Property Group, analysts believe Medical Properties Trust is more attractive than Simon Property Group.

Medical Properties Trust has a beta of 1.417, which suggesting that the stock is 41.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.438, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.815%.

Medical Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.69%. Simon Property Group offers a yield of 5.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share. Medical Properties Trust pays -13.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Simon Property Group pays out 128.47% of its earnings as a dividend.

Medical Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $223.8M, which are smaller than Simon Property Group quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Medical Properties Trust's net income of -$118.3M is lower than Simon Property Group's net income of $414.5M. Notably, Medical Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Simon Property Group's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Medical Properties Trust is 2.93x versus 8.60x for Simon Property Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seritage Growth Properties has a net margin of -52.85% compared to Medical Properties Trust's net margin of -482.76%. Medical Properties Trust's return on equity of -29.59% beat Seritage Growth Properties's return on equity of -35.75%.

Medical Properties Trust has a consensus price target of $5.43, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand Seritage Growth Properties has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 200.35%. Given that Seritage Growth Properties has higher upside potential than Medical Properties Trust, analysts believe Seritage Growth Properties is more attractive than Medical Properties Trust.

Medical Properties Trust has a beta of 1.417, which suggesting that the stock is 41.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seritage Growth Properties has a beta of 2.382, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.246%.

Medical Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.69%. Seritage Growth Properties offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Medical Properties Trust pays -13.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Seritage Growth Properties pays out -3.19% of its earnings as a dividend.

Medical Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $223.8M, which are larger than Seritage Growth Properties quarterly revenues of $4.6M. Medical Properties Trust's net income of -$118.3M is lower than Seritage Growth Properties's net income of -$22.2M. Notably, Medical Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seritage Growth Properties's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Medical Properties Trust is 2.93x versus 9.68x for Seritage Growth Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Service Properties Trust has a net margin of -52.85% compared to Medical Properties Trust's net margin of -26.76%. Medical Properties Trust's return on equity of -29.59% beat Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -33.8%.

Medical Properties Trust has a consensus price target of $5.43, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand Service Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of $2.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.03%. Given that Medical Properties Trust has higher upside potential than Service Properties Trust, analysts believe Medical Properties Trust is more attractive than Service Properties Trust.

Medical Properties Trust has a beta of 1.417, which suggesting that the stock is 41.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Service Properties Trust has a beta of 1.774, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.36%.

Medical Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.69%. Service Properties Trust offers a yield of 10.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Medical Properties Trust pays -13.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Service Properties Trust pays out -36.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Medical Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $223.8M, which are smaller than Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $435.2M. Medical Properties Trust's net income of -$118.3M is lower than Service Properties Trust's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Medical Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Service Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Medical Properties Trust is 2.93x versus 0.19x for Service Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.