MLP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

COPT Defense Properties has a net margin of -73.88% compared to Maui Land & Pineapple's net margin of 19.07%. Maui Land & Pineapple's return on equity of -14.39% beat COPT Defense Properties's return on equity of 8.87%.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand COPT Defense Properties has an analysts' consensus of $35.13 which suggests that it could grow by 18.11%. Given that COPT Defense Properties has higher upside potential than Maui Land & Pineapple, analysts believe COPT Defense Properties is more attractive than Maui Land & Pineapple.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.755% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison COPT Defense Properties has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.175%.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. COPT Defense Properties offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Maui Land & Pineapple pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. COPT Defense Properties pays out -173.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Maui Land & Pineapple quarterly revenues are $3M, which are smaller than COPT Defense Properties quarterly revenues of $189.2M. Maui Land & Pineapple's net income of -$2.2M is lower than COPT Defense Properties's net income of $36.1M. Notably, Maui Land & Pineapple's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while COPT Defense Properties's PE ratio is 24.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maui Land & Pineapple is 31.53x versus 4.47x for COPT Defense Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

American Strategic Investment has a net margin of -73.88% compared to Maui Land & Pineapple's net margin of -223.23%. Maui Land & Pineapple's return on equity of -14.39% beat American Strategic Investment's return on equity of -108.21%.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Strategic Investment has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could fall by -11.01%. Given that American Strategic Investment has higher upside potential than Maui Land & Pineapple, analysts believe American Strategic Investment is more attractive than Maui Land & Pineapple.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.755% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Strategic Investment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Strategic Investment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maui Land & Pineapple pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Strategic Investment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maui Land & Pineapple quarterly revenues are $3M, which are smaller than American Strategic Investment quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Maui Land & Pineapple's net income of -$2.2M is higher than American Strategic Investment's net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Maui Land & Pineapple's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Strategic Investment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maui Land & Pineapple is 31.53x versus 0.35x for American Strategic Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of -73.88% compared to Maui Land & Pineapple's net margin of -2883.88%. Maui Land & Pineapple's return on equity of -14.39% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of --.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Maui Land & Pineapple has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Maui Land & Pineapple is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.755% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maui Land & Pineapple pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maui Land & Pineapple quarterly revenues are $3M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $81.2K. Maui Land & Pineapple's net income of -$2.2M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Maui Land & Pineapple's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maui Land & Pineapple is 31.53x versus -- for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zoned Properties has a net margin of -73.88% compared to Maui Land & Pineapple's net margin of 5.72%. Maui Land & Pineapple's return on equity of -14.39% beat Zoned Properties's return on equity of -4.9%.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zoned Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Maui Land & Pineapple has higher upside potential than Zoned Properties, analysts believe Maui Land & Pineapple is more attractive than Zoned Properties.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.755% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zoned Properties has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.69%.

Maui Land & Pineapple has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zoned Properties offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maui Land & Pineapple pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zoned Properties pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maui Land & Pineapple quarterly revenues are $3M, which are larger than Zoned Properties quarterly revenues of $1M. Maui Land & Pineapple's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Zoned Properties's net income of $58.9K. Notably, Maui Land & Pineapple's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zoned Properties's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maui Land & Pineapple is 31.53x versus 1.66x for Zoned Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.