MGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berry Corp (bry) has a net margin of 29.38% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas's net margin of -0.91%. Magnolia Oil & Gas's return on equity of 19.72% beat Berry Corp (bry)'s return on equity of 2.69%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Berry Corp (bry) has an analysts' consensus of $4.80 which suggests that it could grow by 85.33%. Given that Berry Corp (bry) has higher upside potential than Magnolia Oil & Gas, analysts believe Berry Corp (bry) is more attractive than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.74% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berry Corp (bry) has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.142%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Berry Corp (bry) offers a yield of 13.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays 26.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Corp (bry) pays out 254.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Berry Corp (bry)'s is not.

Magnolia Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $350.3M, which are larger than Berry Corp (bry) quarterly revenues of $193.5M. Magnolia Oil & Gas's net income of $102.9M is higher than Berry Corp (bry)'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Magnolia Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while Berry Corp (bry)'s PE ratio is 10.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magnolia Oil & Gas is 2.97x versus 0.25x for Berry Corp (bry). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of 29.38% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas's net margin of 8.09%. Magnolia Oil & Gas's return on equity of 19.72% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 10.63%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $29.53 which suggests that it could grow by 45.99%. Given that Helmerich & Payne has higher upside potential than Magnolia Oil & Gas, analysts believe Helmerich & Payne is more attractive than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.74% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.773%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 6.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays 26.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magnolia Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $350.3M, which are smaller than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $677.3M. Magnolia Oil & Gas's net income of $102.9M is higher than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $54.8M. Notably, Magnolia Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 6.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magnolia Oil & Gas is 2.97x versus 0.73x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 29.38% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas's net margin of 0.08%. Magnolia Oil & Gas's return on equity of 19.72% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $9.39 which suggests that it could grow by 55.77%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Magnolia Oil & Gas, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.74% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.233%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 5.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays 26.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magnolia Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $350.3M, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Magnolia Oil & Gas's net income of $102.9M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M. Notably, Magnolia Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magnolia Oil & Gas is 2.97x versus 0.46x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seadrill has a net margin of 29.38% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas's net margin of 34.95%. Magnolia Oil & Gas's return on equity of 19.72% beat Seadrill's return on equity of 15.07%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Seadrill has an analysts' consensus of $46.71 which suggests that it could grow by 107.62%. Given that Seadrill has higher upside potential than Magnolia Oil & Gas, analysts believe Seadrill is more attractive than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.74% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Seadrill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays 26.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Seadrill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magnolia Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $350.3M, which are larger than Seadrill quarterly revenues of $289M. Magnolia Oil & Gas's net income of $102.9M is higher than Seadrill's net income of $101M. Notably, Magnolia Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while Seadrill's PE ratio is 3.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magnolia Oil & Gas is 2.97x versus 1.15x for Seadrill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.