MGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berry Corp (bry) has a net margin of 26.21% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas's net margin of -0.91%. Magnolia Oil & Gas's return on equity of 19.01% beat Berry Corp (bry)'s return on equity of 2.69%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $27.87, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Berry Corp (bry) has an analysts' consensus of $5.90 which suggests that it could grow by 84.95%. Given that Berry Corp (bry) has higher upside potential than Magnolia Oil & Gas, analysts believe Berry Corp (bry) is more attractive than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.574, which suggesting that the stock is 57.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berry Corp (bry) has a beta of 1.341, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.096%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Berry Corp (bry) offers a yield of 10.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays 26.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Corp (bry) pays out 254.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Berry Corp (bry)'s is not.

Magnolia Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $326.6M, which are larger than Berry Corp (bry) quarterly revenues of $193.5M. Magnolia Oil & Gas's net income of $85.6M is higher than Berry Corp (bry)'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Magnolia Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.22x while Berry Corp (bry)'s PE ratio is 12.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magnolia Oil & Gas is 3.62x versus 0.31x for Berry Corp (bry). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of 26.21% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas's net margin of 8.09%. Magnolia Oil & Gas's return on equity of 19.01% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 10.63%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $27.87, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $34.40 which suggests that it could grow by 29.81%. Given that Helmerich & Payne has higher upside potential than Magnolia Oil & Gas, analysts believe Helmerich & Payne is more attractive than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.574, which suggesting that the stock is 57.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.45500000000001%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 5.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays 26.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magnolia Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $326.6M, which are smaller than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $677.3M. Magnolia Oil & Gas's net income of $85.6M is higher than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $54.8M. Notably, Magnolia Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.22x while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 8.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magnolia Oil & Gas is 3.62x versus 0.95x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 26.21% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas's net margin of -4.44%. Magnolia Oil & Gas's return on equity of 19.01% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $27.87, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.77 which suggests that it could grow by 28.48%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Magnolia Oil & Gas, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.574, which suggesting that the stock is 57.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.906%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays 26.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magnolia Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $326.6M, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Magnolia Oil & Gas's net income of $85.6M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M. Notably, Magnolia Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.22x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magnolia Oil & Gas is 3.62x versus 0.62x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seadrill has a net margin of 26.21% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas's net margin of 34.95%. Magnolia Oil & Gas's return on equity of 19.01% beat Seadrill's return on equity of 15.07%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $27.87, signalling upside risk potential of 9.24%. On the other hand Seadrill has an analysts' consensus of $48.63 which suggests that it could grow by 89.87%. Given that Seadrill has higher upside potential than Magnolia Oil & Gas, analysts believe Seadrill is more attractive than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.574, which suggesting that the stock is 57.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Seadrill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays 26.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Seadrill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magnolia Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $326.6M, which are larger than Seadrill quarterly revenues of $289M. Magnolia Oil & Gas's net income of $85.6M is lower than Seadrill's net income of $101M. Notably, Magnolia Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.22x while Seadrill's PE ratio is 4.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magnolia Oil & Gas is 3.62x versus 1.30x for Seadrill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.