Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
52
MFSV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$26.75
Seasonality move
:
-1.73%
Day range:
$26.74 - $26.88
52-week range:
$21.75 - $26.88
Dividend yield:
1.62%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
113.1K
Avg. volume:
114.6K
1-year change:
11.97%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVUS
EV Charging USA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPVU
Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
|
$26.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.62% | -- |
|
EVUS
EV Charging USA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
|
$61.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 4.73% | -- |
|
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF
|
$57.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 1.53% | -- |
|
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
|
$28.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.60 | 1.06% | -- |
|
SPVU
Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF
|
$57.36 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 2.41% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
EVUS
EV Charging USA
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
|
-- | 0.676 | -- | -- |
|
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.771 | -- | -- |
|
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
|
-- | 0.771 | -- | -- |
|
SPVU
Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF
|
-- | 0.566 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVUS
EV Charging USA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPVU
Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
MFS Active Value ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MFSV or EVUS?
EV Charging USA has a net margin of -- compared to MFS Active Value ETF's net margin of --. MFS Active Value ETF's return on equity of -- beat EV Charging USA's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFSVMFS Active Value ETF-- -- -- EVUSEV Charging USA-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MFSV or EVUS?
MFS Active Value ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EV Charging USA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MFS Active Value ETF has higher upside potential than EV Charging USA, analysts believe MFS Active Value ETF is more attractive than EV Charging USA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFSVMFS Active Value ETF0 0 0 EVUSEV Charging USA0 0 0 -
Is MFSV or EVUS More Risky?
MFS Active Value ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EV Charging USA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFSV or EVUS?
MFS Active Value ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. EV Charging USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MFS Active Value ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EV Charging USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFSV or EVUS?
MFS Active Value ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EV Charging USA quarterly revenues of --. MFS Active Value ETF's net income of -- is lower than EV Charging USA's net income of --. Notably, MFS Active Value ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EV Charging USA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MFS Active Value ETF is -- versus -- for EV Charging USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFSVMFS Active Value ETF-- -- -- -- EVUSEV Charging USA-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MFSV or INCE?
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF has a net margin of -- compared to MFS Active Value ETF's net margin of --. MFS Active Value ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFSVMFS Active Value ETF-- -- -- INCEFranklin Income Equity Focus ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MFSV or INCE?
MFS Active Value ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MFS Active Value ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF, analysts believe MFS Active Value ETF is more attractive than Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFSVMFS Active Value ETF0 0 0 INCEFranklin Income Equity Focus ETF0 0 0 -
Is MFSV or INCE More Risky?
MFS Active Value ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF has a beta of 0.811, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.918%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFSV or INCE?
MFS Active Value ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF offers a yield of 4.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. MFS Active Value ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFSV or INCE?
MFS Active Value ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF quarterly revenues of --. MFS Active Value ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF's net income of --. Notably, MFS Active Value ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MFS Active Value ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFSVMFS Active Value ETF-- -- -- -- INCEFranklin Income Equity Focus ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MFSV or MFUS?
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to MFS Active Value ETF's net margin of --. MFS Active Value ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFSVMFS Active Value ETF-- -- -- MFUSPIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MFSV or MFUS?
MFS Active Value ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MFS Active Value ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF, analysts believe MFS Active Value ETF is more attractive than PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFSVMFS Active Value ETF0 0 0 MFUSPIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is MFSV or MFUS More Risky?
MFS Active Value ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.496%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFSV or MFUS?
MFS Active Value ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. MFS Active Value ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFSV or MFUS?
MFS Active Value ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. MFS Active Value ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, MFS Active Value ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MFS Active Value ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFSVMFS Active Value ETF-- -- -- -- MFUSPIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MFSV or REVS?
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF has a net margin of -- compared to MFS Active Value ETF's net margin of --. MFS Active Value ETF's return on equity of -- beat Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFSVMFS Active Value ETF-- -- -- REVSColumbia Research Enhanced Value ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MFSV or REVS?
MFS Active Value ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MFS Active Value ETF has higher upside potential than Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF, analysts believe MFS Active Value ETF is more attractive than Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFSVMFS Active Value ETF0 0 0 REVSColumbia Research Enhanced Value ETF0 0 0 -
Is MFSV or REVS More Risky?
MFS Active Value ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.767%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFSV or REVS?
MFS Active Value ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. MFS Active Value ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFSV or REVS?
MFS Active Value ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF quarterly revenues of --. MFS Active Value ETF's net income of -- is lower than Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF's net income of --. Notably, MFS Active Value ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MFS Active Value ETF is -- versus -- for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFSVMFS Active Value ETF-- -- -- -- REVSColumbia Research Enhanced Value ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MFSV or SPVU?
Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF has a net margin of -- compared to MFS Active Value ETF's net margin of --. MFS Active Value ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFSVMFS Active Value ETF-- -- -- SPVUInvesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MFSV or SPVU?
MFS Active Value ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MFS Active Value ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF, analysts believe MFS Active Value ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFSVMFS Active Value ETF0 0 0 SPVUInvesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF0 0 0 -
Is MFSV or SPVU More Risky?
MFS Active Value ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.516%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFSV or SPVU?
MFS Active Value ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. MFS Active Value ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFSV or SPVU?
MFS Active Value ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF quarterly revenues of --. MFS Active Value ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF's net income of --. Notably, MFS Active Value ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MFS Active Value ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFSVMFS Active Value ETF-- -- -- -- SPVUInvesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
64
GLTO alert for Dec 26
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 26
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is down 1.54% over the past day.
Sell
27
CDNAF alert for Dec 26
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
