LGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clough Global Opportunities Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's net margin of --. Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's return on equity of -- beat Clough Global Opportunities Fund's return on equity of --.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clough Global Opportunities Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has higher upside potential than Clough Global Opportunities Fund, analysts believe Lazard Global Total Return &Fd is more attractive than Clough Global Opportunities Fund.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clough Global Opportunities Fund has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.253%.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.26%. Clough Global Opportunities Fund offers a yield of 0.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Lazard Global Total Return &Fd pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clough Global Opportunities Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clough Global Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues of --. Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's net income of -- is lower than Clough Global Opportunities Fund's net income of --. Notably, Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clough Global Opportunities Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard Global Total Return &Fd is -- versus -- for Clough Global Opportunities Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clough Global Equity Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's net margin of --. Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's return on equity of -- beat Clough Global Equity Fund's return on equity of --.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clough Global Equity Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has higher upside potential than Clough Global Equity Fund, analysts believe Lazard Global Total Return &Fd is more attractive than Clough Global Equity Fund.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clough Global Equity Fund has a beta of 1.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.061%.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.26%. Clough Global Equity Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Lazard Global Total Return &Fd pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clough Global Equity Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clough Global Equity Fund quarterly revenues of --. Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's net income of -- is lower than Clough Global Equity Fund's net income of --. Notably, Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clough Global Equity Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard Global Total Return &Fd is -- versus -- for Clough Global Equity Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polen Capital Global Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's net margin of --. Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's return on equity of -- beat Polen Capital Global Growth ETF's return on equity of --.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polen Capital Global Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has higher upside potential than Polen Capital Global Growth ETF, analysts believe Lazard Global Total Return &Fd is more attractive than Polen Capital Global Growth ETF.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polen Capital Global Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.26%. Polen Capital Global Growth ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lazard Global Total Return &Fd pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polen Capital Global Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lazard Global Total Return &Fd quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Polen Capital Global Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's net income of -- is lower than Polen Capital Global Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Lazard Global Total Return &Fd's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Polen Capital Global Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard Global Total Return &Fd is -- versus -- for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.