LAZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone, Inc. has a net margin of 5.83% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 43.77%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.85% beat Blackstone, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.16%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $59.56, signalling upside risk potential of 16.57%. On the other hand Blackstone, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $168.61 which suggests that it could grow by 34.07%. Given that Blackstone, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lazard, Inc., analysts believe Blackstone, Inc. is more attractive than Lazard, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone, Inc. has a beta of 1.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.395%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Blackstone, Inc. offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.49 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone, Inc. pays out 121.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone, Inc.'s is not.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $929.4M, which are smaller than Blackstone, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $54.2M is lower than Blackstone, Inc.'s net income of $2B. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Blackstone, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.70x versus 7.00x for Blackstone, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evercore, Inc. has a net margin of 5.83% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 17.15%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.85% beat Evercore, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.23%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $59.56, signalling upside risk potential of 16.57%. On the other hand Evercore, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $395.10 which suggests that it could grow by 20.87%. Given that Evercore, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lazard, Inc., analysts believe Evercore, Inc. is more attractive than Lazard, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evercore, Inc. has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.978%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Evercore, Inc. offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore, Inc. pays out 23.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $929.4M, which are smaller than Evercore, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $54.2M is lower than Evercore, Inc.'s net income of $222.5M. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Evercore, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.70x versus 3.55x for Evercore, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Federated Hermes, Inc. has a net margin of 5.83% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 22.41%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.85% beat Federated Hermes, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.99%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $59.56, signalling upside risk potential of 16.57%. On the other hand Federated Hermes, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.71 which suggests that it could fall by -0.18%. Given that Lazard, Inc. has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, Inc., analysts believe Lazard, Inc. is more attractive than Federated Hermes, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes, Inc. has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.332%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Federated Hermes, Inc. offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes, Inc. pays out 25.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $929.4M, which are larger than Federated Hermes, Inc. quarterly revenues of $482.8M. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $54.2M is lower than Federated Hermes, Inc.'s net income of $108.2M. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Federated Hermes, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.70x versus 2.28x for Federated Hermes, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has a net margin of 5.83% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 19.95%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.85% beat Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.68%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $59.56, signalling upside risk potential of 16.57%. On the other hand Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.77 which suggests that it could grow by 53.43%. Given that Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lazard, Inc., analysts believe Blue Owl Capital, Inc. is more attractive than Lazard, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has a beta of 1.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.07%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Blue Owl Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 7.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Owl Capital, Inc. pays out 855% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s is not.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $929.4M, which are larger than Blue Owl Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of $755.6M. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $54.2M is lower than Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s net income of $150.7M. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is 114.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.70x versus 3.57x for Blue Owl Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.