LAZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone has a net margin of 10.47% compared to Lazard's net margin of 26.04%. Lazard's return on equity of 43.31% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 14.74%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of $53.38, signalling upside risk potential of 15.68%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $182.38 which suggests that it could grow by 24.76%. Given that Blackstone has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe Blackstone is more attractive than Lazard.

Lazard has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.211%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. Blackstone offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.44 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 159.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone's is not.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $824.7M, which are smaller than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Lazard's net income of $86.3M is lower than Blackstone's net income of $703.9M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.35x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 40.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.53x versus 10.25x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evercore has a net margin of 10.47% compared to Lazard's net margin of 14.4%. Lazard's return on equity of 43.31% beat Evercore's return on equity of 21.3%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of $53.38, signalling upside risk potential of 15.68%. On the other hand Evercore has an analysts' consensus of $292.43 which suggests that it could grow by 45.23%. Given that Evercore has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe Evercore is more attractive than Lazard.

Lazard has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evercore has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.842%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. Evercore offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore pays out 35.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $824.7M, which are smaller than Evercore quarterly revenues of $975.3M. Lazard's net income of $86.3M is lower than Evercore's net income of $140.4M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.35x while Evercore's PE ratio is 22.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.53x versus 2.81x for Evercore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PJT Partners has a net margin of 10.47% compared to Lazard's net margin of 10.75%. Lazard's return on equity of 43.31% beat PJT Partners's return on equity of 15.56%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of $53.38, signalling upside risk potential of 15.68%. On the other hand PJT Partners has an analysts' consensus of $168.75 which suggests that it could grow by 20.16%. Given that PJT Partners has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe PJT Partners is more attractive than Lazard.

Lazard has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PJT Partners has a beta of 0.684, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.63%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. PJT Partners offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. PJT Partners pays out 17.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $824.7M, which are larger than PJT Partners quarterly revenues of $477.3M. Lazard's net income of $86.3M is higher than PJT Partners's net income of $51.3M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.35x while PJT Partners's PE ratio is 28.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.53x versus 3.78x for PJT Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 10.47% compared to Lazard's net margin of 24.11%. Lazard's return on equity of 43.31% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.29%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of $53.38, signalling upside risk potential of 15.68%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $109.79 which suggests that it could grow by 16.41%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Lazard.

Lazard has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.464%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.34%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $824.7M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Lazard's net income of $86.3M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $439.9M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.35x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 10.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.53x versus 2.97x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.