LAZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone, Inc. has a net margin of 9.3% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 34.71%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.86% beat Blackstone, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.67%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $57.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand Blackstone, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $181.41 which suggests that it could grow by 16.42%. Given that Lazard, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blackstone, Inc., analysts believe Lazard, Inc. is more attractive than Blackstone, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone, Inc. has a beta of 1.765, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.471%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.06%. Blackstone, Inc. offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.29 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 74.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone, Inc. pays out 95.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $773.4M, which are smaller than Blackstone, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $71.9M is lower than Blackstone, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.56x while Blackstone, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.67x versus 8.60x for Blackstone, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evercore, Inc. has a net margin of 9.3% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 15.06%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.86% beat Evercore, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.23%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $57.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand Evercore, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $353.56 which suggests that it could grow by 1.46%. Given that Lazard, Inc. has higher upside potential than Evercore, Inc., analysts believe Lazard, Inc. is more attractive than Evercore, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evercore, Inc. has a beta of 1.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.632%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.06%. Evercore, Inc. offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 74.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore, Inc. pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $773.4M, which are smaller than Evercore, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $71.9M is lower than Evercore, Inc.'s net income of $157.5M. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.56x while Evercore, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.67x versus 4.12x for Evercore, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 9.3% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 48.78%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.86% beat MARA Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.38%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $57.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand MARA Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.41 which suggests that it could grow by 127.32%. Given that MARA Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lazard, Inc., analysts believe MARA Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Lazard, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 5.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 442.356%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.06%. MARA Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 74.67% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $773.4M, which are larger than MARA Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.4M. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $71.9M is lower than MARA Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $123.1M. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.56x while MARA Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.67x versus 4.49x for MARA Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has a net margin of 9.3% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 6.51%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.86% beat Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.68%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $57.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.88 which suggests that it could grow by 33.19%. Given that Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lazard, Inc., analysts believe Blue Owl Capital, Inc. is more attractive than Lazard, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.06%. Blue Owl Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 5.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 74.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Owl Capital, Inc. pays out 346.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s is not.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $773.4M, which are larger than Blue Owl Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of $728M. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $71.9M is higher than Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s net income of $47.4M. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.56x while Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is 348.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.67x versus 4.98x for Blue Owl Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.