LAZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone, Inc. has a net margin of 5.83% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 43.77%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.85% beat Blackstone, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.16%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $59.63, signalling upside risk potential of 10.99%. On the other hand Blackstone, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $173.82 which suggests that it could grow by 22.05%. Given that Blackstone, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lazard, Inc., analysts believe Blackstone, Inc. is more attractive than Lazard, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone, Inc. has a beta of 1.755, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.492%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Blackstone, Inc. offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.29 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone, Inc. pays out 121.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone, Inc.'s is not.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $929.4M, which are smaller than Blackstone, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $54.2M is lower than Blackstone, Inc.'s net income of $2B. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.72x while Blackstone, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.79x versus 7.92x for Blackstone, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evercore, Inc. has a net margin of 5.83% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 15.06%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.85% beat Evercore, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.23%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $59.63, signalling upside risk potential of 10.99%. On the other hand Evercore, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $386.40 which suggests that it could grow by 9.38%. Given that Lazard, Inc. has higher upside potential than Evercore, Inc., analysts believe Lazard, Inc. is more attractive than Evercore, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evercore, Inc. has a beta of 1.569, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.871%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Evercore, Inc. offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore, Inc. pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $929.4M, which are smaller than Evercore, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $54.2M is lower than Evercore, Inc.'s net income of $157.5M. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.72x while Evercore, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.79x versus 4.17x for Evercore, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 5.83% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 48.78%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.85% beat MARA Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.38%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $59.63, signalling upside risk potential of 10.99%. On the other hand MARA Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.66 which suggests that it could grow by 117.46%. Given that MARA Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lazard, Inc., analysts believe MARA Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Lazard, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 5.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 434.581%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. MARA Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $929.4M, which are larger than MARA Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.4M. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $54.2M is lower than MARA Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $123.1M. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.72x while MARA Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.79x versus 4.33x for MARA Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has a net margin of 5.83% compared to Lazard, Inc.'s net margin of 6.51%. Lazard, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.85% beat Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.68%.

Lazard, Inc. has a consensus price target of $59.63, signalling upside risk potential of 10.99%. On the other hand Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.12 which suggests that it could grow by 47.48%. Given that Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lazard, Inc., analysts believe Blue Owl Capital, Inc. is more attractive than Lazard, Inc..

Lazard, Inc. has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Owl Capital, Inc. has a beta of 1.126, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.627%.

Lazard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Blue Owl Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 6.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Lazard, Inc. pays 82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Owl Capital, Inc. pays out 346.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s is not.

Lazard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $929.4M, which are larger than Blue Owl Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of $728M. Lazard, Inc.'s net income of $54.2M is higher than Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s net income of $47.4M. Notably, Lazard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.72x while Blue Owl Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is 303.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard, Inc. is 1.79x versus 4.33x for Blue Owl Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.