KOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of -39.85% compared to Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 71.5%. Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.42% beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $2.10, signalling upside risk potential of 124.98%. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kosmos Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe Kosmos Energy Ltd. is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.209, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.927%.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kosmos Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $311.9M, which are larger than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$124.3M is lower than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.95x while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kosmos Energy Ltd. is 0.32x versus 20.77x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of -39.85% compared to Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 0.36%. Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.42% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64%.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $2.10, signalling upside risk potential of 124.98%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $31.72 which suggests that it could fall by -2.79%. Given that Kosmos Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe Kosmos Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.851%.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Kosmos Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $311.9M, which are smaller than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$124.3M is lower than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M. Notably, Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.95x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 21.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kosmos Energy Ltd. is 0.32x versus 1.27x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hess Midstream LP has a net margin of -39.85% compared to Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 41.7%. Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.42% beat Hess Midstream LP's return on equity of 146.28%.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $2.10, signalling upside risk potential of 124.98%. On the other hand Hess Midstream LP has an analysts' consensus of $36.83 which suggests that it could grow by 8.46%. Given that Kosmos Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hess Midstream LP, analysts believe Kosmos Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Hess Midstream LP.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess Midstream LP has a beta of 0.612, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.774%.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hess Midstream LP offers a yield of 8.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Kosmos Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hess Midstream LP pays out 105.25% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $311.9M, which are smaller than Hess Midstream LP quarterly revenues of $420.9M. Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$124.3M is lower than Hess Midstream LP's net income of $175.5M. Notably, Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.95x while Hess Midstream LP's PE ratio is 12.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kosmos Energy Ltd. is 0.32x versus 2.46x for Hess Midstream LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB Ltd. has a net margin of -39.85% compared to Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 8.68%. Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.42% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.49%.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of $2.10, signalling upside risk potential of 124.98%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $47.30 which suggests that it could grow by 6.45%. Given that Kosmos Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than SLB Ltd., analysts believe Kosmos Energy Ltd. is more attractive than SLB Ltd..

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.893, which suggesting that the stock is 10.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.18%.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Kosmos Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kosmos Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $311.9M, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $8.9B. Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$124.3M is lower than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $774M. Notably, Kosmos Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.95x while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kosmos Energy Ltd. is 0.32x versus 1.78x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.