KEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Exelon has a net margin of 7.09% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of 11.49%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 9.76% beat Exelon's return on equity of 9.34%.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.47%. On the other hand Exelon has an analysts' consensus of $42.73 which suggests that it could grow by 14.46%. Given that Korea Electric Power has higher upside potential than Exelon, analysts believe Korea Electric Power is more attractive than Exelon.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.177% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exelon has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.588%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exelon offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Korea Electric Power pays -0.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon pays out 61.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Exelon quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.4B is higher than Exelon's net income of $707M. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.27x while Exelon's PE ratio is 15.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.14x versus 1.63x for Exelon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Fortress Energy has a net margin of 7.09% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of 1.64%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 9.76% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity of 11.23%.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.47%. On the other hand New Fortress Energy has an analysts' consensus of $19.63 which suggests that it could grow by 34.79%. Given that Korea Electric Power has higher upside potential than New Fortress Energy, analysts believe Korea Electric Power is more attractive than New Fortress Energy.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.177% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.608, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.834%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Fortress Energy offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Korea Electric Power pays -0.94% of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy pays out 132.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues of $567.5M. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.4B is higher than New Fortress Energy's net income of $9.3M. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.27x while New Fortress Energy's PE ratio is 16.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.14x versus 1.23x for New Fortress Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a net margin of 7.09% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of --. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 9.76% beat Eco Wave Power Global AB's return on equity of --.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.47%. On the other hand Eco Wave Power Global AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Korea Electric Power has higher upside potential than Eco Wave Power Global AB, analysts believe Korea Electric Power is more attractive than Eco Wave Power Global AB.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.177% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eco Wave Power Global AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eco Wave Power Global AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Korea Electric Power pays -0.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Eco Wave Power Global AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Eco Wave Power Global AB quarterly revenues of --. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.4B is higher than Eco Wave Power Global AB's net income of -$549K. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.27x while Eco Wave Power Global AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.14x versus -- for Eco Wave Power Global AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 7.09% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of 18.72%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 9.76% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.44%.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.47%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $72.39 which suggests that it could grow by 6.89%. Given that Korea Electric Power has higher upside potential than Xcel Energy, analysts believe Korea Electric Power is more attractive than Xcel Energy.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.177% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.995%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Korea Electric Power pays -0.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 61.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.4B is higher than Xcel Energy's net income of $682M. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.27x while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 20.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.14x versus 2.75x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.