JHG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Burford Capital Ltd. has a net margin of 35.13% compared to Janus Henderson Group Plc's net margin of -32.17%. Janus Henderson Group Plc's return on equity of 15.94% beat Burford Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.21%.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a consensus price target of $50.14, signalling downside risk potential of -0.11%. On the other hand Burford Capital Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $17.51 which suggests that it could grow by 81.44%. Given that Burford Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than Janus Henderson Group Plc, analysts believe Burford Capital Ltd. is more attractive than Janus Henderson Group Plc.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a beta of 1.540, which suggesting that the stock is 54.032% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Burford Capital Ltd. has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.179%.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Burford Capital Ltd. offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Janus Henderson Group Plc pays 30.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Burford Capital Ltd. pays out 18.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Janus Henderson Group Plc quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Burford Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues of $63M. Janus Henderson Group Plc's net income of $417M is higher than Burford Capital Ltd.'s net income of -$20.3M. Notably, Janus Henderson Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.56x while Burford Capital Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Group Plc is 2.36x versus 4.58x for Burford Capital Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has a net margin of 35.13% compared to Janus Henderson Group Plc's net margin of 17.32%. Janus Henderson Group Plc's return on equity of 15.94% beat The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.82%.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a consensus price target of $50.14, signalling downside risk potential of -0.11%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $959.20 which suggests that it could grow by 4.01%. Given that The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Janus Henderson Group Plc, analysts believe The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is more attractive than Janus Henderson Group Plc.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a beta of 1.540, which suggesting that the stock is 54.032% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.946%.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.00 per share. Janus Henderson Group Plc pays 30.41% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. pays out 27.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Janus Henderson Group Plc quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $26.7B. Janus Henderson Group Plc's net income of $417M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s net income of $4.6B. Notably, Janus Henderson Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.56x while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Group Plc is 2.36x versus 2.41x for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invesco Ltd. has a net margin of 35.13% compared to Janus Henderson Group Plc's net margin of -58.86%. Janus Henderson Group Plc's return on equity of 15.94% beat Invesco Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.18%.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a consensus price target of $50.14, signalling downside risk potential of -0.11%. On the other hand Invesco Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $30.09 which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that Invesco Ltd. has higher upside potential than Janus Henderson Group Plc, analysts believe Invesco Ltd. is more attractive than Janus Henderson Group Plc.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a beta of 1.540, which suggesting that the stock is 54.032% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Ltd. has a beta of 1.688, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.752%.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Invesco Ltd. offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Janus Henderson Group Plc pays 30.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Ltd. pays out 69.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Janus Henderson Group Plc quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Invesco Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Janus Henderson Group Plc's net income of $417M is higher than Invesco Ltd.'s net income of -$995.9M. Notably, Janus Henderson Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.56x while Invesco Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Group Plc is 2.36x versus 1.85x for Invesco Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 35.13% compared to Janus Henderson Group Plc's net margin of 30.15%. Janus Henderson Group Plc's return on equity of 15.94% beat Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.27%.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a consensus price target of $50.14, signalling downside risk potential of -0.11%. On the other hand Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $72.83 which suggests that it could fall by -3.65%. Given that Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. has more downside risk than Janus Henderson Group Plc, analysts believe Janus Henderson Group Plc is more attractive than Victory Capital Holdings, Inc..

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a beta of 1.540, which suggesting that the stock is 54.032% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.779%.

Janus Henderson Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Janus Henderson Group Plc pays 30.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. pays out 47.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Janus Henderson Group Plc quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $374.1M. Janus Henderson Group Plc's net income of $417M is higher than Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $112.8M. Notably, Janus Henderson Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.56x while Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Group Plc is 2.36x versus 3.79x for Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.