HLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyatt Hotels has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of 1.16%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Hyatt Hotels's return on equity of 21.12%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $247.23, signalling upside risk potential of 3.46%. On the other hand Hyatt Hotels has an analysts' consensus of $142.96 which suggests that it could grow by 16.98%. Given that Hyatt Hotels has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Hyatt Hotels is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.939% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyatt Hotels has a beta of 1.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.35%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Hyatt Hotels offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyatt Hotels pays out 4.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Hyatt Hotels quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M is higher than Hyatt Hotels's net income of $20M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.69x while Hyatt Hotels's PE ratio is 15.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.23x versus 1.85x for Hyatt Hotels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott International has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of 7.08%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Marriott International's return on equity of --.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $247.23, signalling upside risk potential of 3.46%. On the other hand Marriott International has an analysts' consensus of $269.88 which suggests that it could grow by 9.14%. Given that Marriott International has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Marriott International is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.939% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott International has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.664%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Marriott International offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International pays out 28.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Marriott International quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M is lower than Marriott International's net income of $455M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.69x while Marriott International's PE ratio is 29.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.23x versus 2.81x for Marriott International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vail Resorts has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of 21.59%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Vail Resorts's return on equity of 25.56%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $247.23, signalling upside risk potential of 3.46%. On the other hand Vail Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $181.64 which suggests that it could grow by 29.57%. Given that Vail Resorts has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Vail Resorts is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.939% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vail Resorts has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.071%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Vail Resorts offers a yield of 6.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.22 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Vail Resorts pays out 140.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Vail Resorts's is not.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Vail Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M is higher than Vail Resorts's net income of $245.5M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.69x while Vail Resorts's PE ratio is 20.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.23x versus 1.79x for Vail Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of 19.3%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Wyndham Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 53.72%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $247.23, signalling upside risk potential of 3.46%. On the other hand Wyndham Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $104.26 which suggests that it could grow by 24.59%. Given that Wyndham Hotels & Resorts has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Wyndham Hotels & Resorts is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.939% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wyndham Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.67%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts pays out 42.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Wyndham Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $316M. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M is higher than Wyndham Hotels & Resorts's net income of $61M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.69x while Wyndham Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 19.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.23x versus 4.70x for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.