HBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has a net margin of 65.8% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of 18.19%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.3% beat Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.56%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.8000, signalling upside risk potential of 25.72%. On the other hand Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.97 which suggests that it could grow by 7.53%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc..

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.93%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.08%. Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. pays out 46.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $338M, which are smaller than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $222.4M is lower than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 3.44x versus 2.50x for Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of 65.8% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of 3.66%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.3% beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.8000, signalling upside risk potential of 25.72%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 60.82%. Given that Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Flexible Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.501%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.08%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $338M, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $222.4M is higher than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 47.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 3.44x versus 2.26x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brazil Potash Corp has a net margin of 65.8% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.3% beat Brazil Potash Corp's return on equity of --.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.8000, signalling upside risk potential of 25.72%. On the other hand Brazil Potash Corp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brazil Potash Corp, analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Brazil Potash Corp.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brazil Potash Corp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.08%. Brazil Potash Corp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Brazil Potash Corp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $338M, which are larger than Brazil Potash Corp quarterly revenues of --. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $222.4M is higher than Brazil Potash Corp's net income of --. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Brazil Potash Corp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 3.44x versus -- for Brazil Potash Corp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 65.8% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.3% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.8000, signalling upside risk potential of 25.72%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 9.26%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty Corp., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Gold Royalty Corp..

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.08%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $338M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $222.4M is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 3.44x versus 51.63x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.