HBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Golden Royal Development has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Hudbay Minerals's net margin of --. Hudbay Minerals's return on equity of 3.66% beat Golden Royal Development's return on equity of --.

Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.02%. On the other hand Golden Royal Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudbay Minerals has higher upside potential than Golden Royal Development, analysts believe Hudbay Minerals is more attractive than Golden Royal Development.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 1.759, which suggesting that the stock is 75.933% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Royal Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hudbay Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Golden Royal Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Royal Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals quarterly revenues are $485.8M, which are larger than Golden Royal Development quarterly revenues of --. Hudbay Minerals's net income of $49.8M is higher than Golden Royal Development's net income of -$6.1K. Notably, Hudbay Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.86x while Golden Royal Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals is 1.53x versus -- for Golden Royal Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Hudbay Minerals's net margin of -124.64%. Hudbay Minerals's return on equity of 3.66% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.02%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.21 which suggests that it could grow by 156.67%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 1.759, which suggesting that the stock is 75.933% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hudbay Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hudbay Minerals pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals quarterly revenues are $485.8M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Hudbay Minerals's net income of $49.8M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Hudbay Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.86x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals is 1.53x versus 24.76x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metaline Contact Mines has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Hudbay Minerals's net margin of --. Hudbay Minerals's return on equity of 3.66% beat Metaline Contact Mines's return on equity of --.

Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.02%. On the other hand Metaline Contact Mines has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudbay Minerals has higher upside potential than Metaline Contact Mines, analysts believe Hudbay Minerals is more attractive than Metaline Contact Mines.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 1.759, which suggesting that the stock is 75.933% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metaline Contact Mines has a beta of 0.965, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.533%.

Hudbay Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Metaline Contact Mines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Metaline Contact Mines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals quarterly revenues are $485.8M, which are larger than Metaline Contact Mines quarterly revenues of --. Hudbay Minerals's net income of $49.8M is higher than Metaline Contact Mines's net income of --. Notably, Hudbay Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.86x while Metaline Contact Mines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals is 1.53x versus -- for Metaline Contact Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Hudbay Minerals's net margin of --. Hudbay Minerals's return on equity of 3.66% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.02%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 232.41%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 1.759, which suggesting that the stock is 75.933% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Hudbay Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals quarterly revenues are $485.8M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Hudbay Minerals's net income of $49.8M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Hudbay Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.86x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals is 1.53x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.