HBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California-Engels Mining Co. has a net margin of 65.8% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of -223.74%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.3% beat California-Engels Mining Co.'s return on equity of 1.62%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.2750, signalling upside risk potential of 18.33%. On the other hand California-Engels Mining Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than California-Engels Mining Co., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than California-Engels Mining Co..

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California-Engels Mining Co. has a beta of 0.226, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.394%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. California-Engels Mining Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. California-Engels Mining Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $338M, which are larger than California-Engels Mining Co. quarterly revenues of $13.9K. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $222.4M is higher than California-Engels Mining Co.'s net income of -$31.1K. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.30x while California-Engels Mining Co.'s PE ratio is 238.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 4.91x versus 35.96x for California-Engels Mining Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has a net margin of 65.8% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of 10.78%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.3% beat Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.86%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.2750, signalling upside risk potential of 18.33%. On the other hand Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $64.02 which suggests that it could grow by 2.32%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc..

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has a beta of 1.470, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.973%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. pays out 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $338M, which are smaller than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $222.4M is lower than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s net income of $565M. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.30x while Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 4.91x versus 3.59x for Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Royal Development, Inc. has a net margin of 65.8% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.3% beat Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.2750, signalling upside risk potential of 18.33%. On the other hand Golden Royal Development, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Golden Royal Development, Inc., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Golden Royal Development, Inc..

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Royal Development, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. Golden Royal Development, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Royal Development, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $338M, which are larger than Golden Royal Development, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $222.4M is higher than Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s net income of -$6.1K. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.30x while Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 4.91x versus -- for Golden Royal Development, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metaline Contact Mines Co. has a net margin of 65.8% compared to Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.3% beat Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s return on equity of --.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.2750, signalling upside risk potential of 18.33%. On the other hand Metaline Contact Mines Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Metaline Contact Mines Co., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Metaline Contact Mines Co..

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metaline Contact Mines Co. has a beta of 2.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.373%.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.06%. Metaline Contact Mines Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Metaline Contact Mines Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $338M, which are larger than Metaline Contact Mines Co. quarterly revenues of --. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $222.4M is higher than Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s net income of --. Notably, Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.30x while Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s PE ratio is 200.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is 4.91x versus 23.36x for Metaline Contact Mines Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.