GPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mastercard, Inc. has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 46.03%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 5% beat Mastercard, Inc.'s return on equity of 203.65%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $101.85, signalling upside risk potential of 30.82%. On the other hand Mastercard, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $662.06 which suggests that it could grow by 28.61%. Given that Global Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mastercard, Inc., analysts believe Global Payments, Inc. is more attractive than Mastercard, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard, Inc. has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.591%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Mastercard, Inc. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 17.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard, Inc. pays out 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Mastercard, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.8B. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $168.6M is lower than Mastercard, Inc.'s net income of $4.1B. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.49x while Mastercard, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 2.29x versus 14.21x for Mastercard, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of -22.39%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 5% beat TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -128.95%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $101.85, signalling upside risk potential of 30.82%. On the other hand TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 446.7%. Given that TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Payments, Inc., analysts believe TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than Global Payments, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.565, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.476%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 17.29% of its earnings as a dividend. TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2M. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $168.6M is higher than TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$450.3K. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.49x while TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 2.29x versus 2.26x for TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa, Inc. has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 53.23%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 5% beat Visa, Inc.'s return on equity of 53.72%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $101.85, signalling upside risk potential of 30.82%. On the other hand Visa, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $400.81 which suggests that it could grow by 26.56%. Given that Global Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than Visa, Inc., analysts believe Global Payments, Inc. is more attractive than Visa, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa, Inc. has a beta of 0.791, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.87%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Visa, Inc. offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 17.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa, Inc. pays out 23.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Visa, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.9B. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $168.6M is lower than Visa, Inc.'s net income of $5.8B. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.49x while Visa, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 2.29x versus 14.94x for Visa, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verisk Analytics, Inc. has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 25.32%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 5% beat Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s return on equity of 369.62%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $101.85, signalling upside risk potential of 30.82%. On the other hand Verisk Analytics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $221.12 which suggests that it could grow by 9.12%. Given that Global Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than Verisk Analytics, Inc., analysts believe Global Payments, Inc. is more attractive than Verisk Analytics, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verisk Analytics, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.399%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Verisk Analytics, Inc. offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 17.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Verisk Analytics, Inc. pays out 27.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Verisk Analytics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $778.8M. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $168.6M is lower than Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s net income of $197.2M. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.49x while Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 2.29x versus 9.24x for Verisk Analytics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.