GPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

National Asset Recovery has a net margin of 12.11% compared to Global Payments's net margin of --. Global Payments's return on equity of 5.85% beat National Asset Recovery's return on equity of --.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $132.73, signalling upside risk potential of 18.48%. On the other hand National Asset Recovery has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5110.73%. Given that National Asset Recovery has higher upside potential than Global Payments, analysts believe National Asset Recovery is more attractive than Global Payments.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.319% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Asset Recovery has a beta of 2.681, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168.06%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. National Asset Recovery offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Payments pays 26.41% of its earnings as a dividend. National Asset Recovery pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than National Asset Recovery quarterly revenues of --. Global Payments's net income of $315.1M is higher than National Asset Recovery's net income of --. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while National Asset Recovery's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 2.88x versus -- for National Asset Recovery. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gibraltar Industries has a net margin of 12.11% compared to Global Payments's net margin of 9.42%. Global Payments's return on equity of 5.85% beat Gibraltar Industries's return on equity of 11.71%.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $132.73, signalling upside risk potential of 18.48%. On the other hand Gibraltar Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.58%. Given that Gibraltar Industries has higher upside potential than Global Payments, analysts believe Gibraltar Industries is more attractive than Global Payments.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.319% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gibraltar Industries has a beta of 1.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.663%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Gibraltar Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Payments pays 26.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Gibraltar Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Gibraltar Industries quarterly revenues of $361.2M. Global Payments's net income of $315.1M is higher than Gibraltar Industries's net income of $34M. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while Gibraltar Industries's PE ratio is 16.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 2.88x versus 1.40x for Gibraltar Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has a net margin of 12.11% compared to Global Payments's net margin of 2.32%. Global Payments's return on equity of 5.85% beat TOMI Environmental Solutions's return on equity of -30.92%.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $132.73, signalling upside risk potential of 18.48%. On the other hand TOMI Environmental Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 358.9%. Given that TOMI Environmental Solutions has higher upside potential than Global Payments, analysts believe TOMI Environmental Solutions is more attractive than Global Payments.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.319% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOMI Environmental Solutions has a beta of -2.777, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 377.71%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. TOMI Environmental Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Payments pays 26.41% of its earnings as a dividend. TOMI Environmental Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than TOMI Environmental Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Global Payments's net income of $315.1M is higher than TOMI Environmental Solutions's net income of $59K. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while TOMI Environmental Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 2.88x versus 1.91x for TOMI Environmental Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of 12.11% compared to Global Payments's net margin of 55.3%. Global Payments's return on equity of 5.85% beat Visa's return on equity of 49.9%.

Global Payments has a consensus price target of $132.73, signalling upside risk potential of 18.48%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $331.75 which suggests that it could grow by 4.42%. Given that Global Payments has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Global Payments is more attractive than Visa.

Global Payments has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.319% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.804%.

Global Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Visa offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Global Payments pays 26.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Global Payments's net income of $315.1M is lower than Visa's net income of $5.3B. Notably, Global Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.10x while Visa's PE ratio is 32.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments is 2.88x versus 17.94x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.