GPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mastercard, Inc. has a net margin of 23.57% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 45.57%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.85% beat Mastercard, Inc.'s return on equity of 195.2%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $103.96, signalling upside risk potential of 28.05%. On the other hand Mastercard, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $657.92 which suggests that it could grow by 13.45%. Given that Global Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mastercard, Inc., analysts believe Global Payments, Inc. is more attractive than Mastercard, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard, Inc. has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.331%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Mastercard, Inc. offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 16.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard, Inc. pays out 19.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Mastercard, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.6B. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $473.3M is lower than Mastercard, Inc.'s net income of $3.9B. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.39x while Mastercard, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 2.24x versus 16.77x for Mastercard, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 23.57% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 14.74%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.85% beat PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.28%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $103.96, signalling upside risk potential of 28.05%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $78.48 which suggests that it could grow by 30.72%. Given that PayPal Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Payments, Inc., analysts believe PayPal Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Global Payments, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.433, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.336%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. PayPal Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 16.23% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $473.3M is lower than PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.39x while PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 2.24x versus 1.80x for PayPal Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 23.57% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of -22.39%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.85% beat TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -128.95%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $103.96, signalling upside risk potential of 28.05%. On the other hand TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 344.22%. Given that TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Payments, Inc., analysts believe TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than Global Payments, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.542, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.166%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 16.23% of its earnings as a dividend. TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2M. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $473.3M is higher than TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$450.3K. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.39x while TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 2.24x versus 2.78x for TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa, Inc. has a net margin of 23.57% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 47.01%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.85% beat Visa, Inc.'s return on equity of 51.69%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $103.96, signalling upside risk potential of 28.05%. On the other hand Visa, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $395.85 which suggests that it could grow by 12.02%. Given that Global Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than Visa, Inc., analysts believe Global Payments, Inc. is more attractive than Visa, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa, Inc. has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.796%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Visa, Inc. offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 16.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa, Inc. pays out 23.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Visa, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.7B. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $473.3M is lower than Visa, Inc.'s net income of $5B. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.39x while Visa, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 2.24x versus 17.37x for Visa, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.