Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Buy
58
GOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.25
Seasonality move
:
1.23%
Day range:
$15.13 - $15.29
52-week range:
$12.59 - $16.08
Dividend yield:
5.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
632.5K
Avg. volume:
943.3K
1-year change:
17.44%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BTZ
Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
$15.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 5.03% | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
$52.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.58 | 6.14% | -- |
|
BTZ
Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust
|
$10.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 6.45% | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
$9.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 6.77% | -- |
|
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
|
$18.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 14.35% | -- |
|
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds
|
$14.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 9.94% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -0.576 | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | 0.565 | -- | -- |
|
BTZ
Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust
|
-- | 1.265 | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | 1.006 | -- | -- |
|
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
|
-- | 0.533 | -- | -- |
|
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds
|
-- | -0.272 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BTZ
Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GOF or BINC?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of -- beat iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GOF or BINC?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has higher upside potential than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF, analysts believe Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is more attractive than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is GOF or BINC More Risky?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.871% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOF or BINC?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.03%. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF offers a yield of 6.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GOF or BINC?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of -- is lower than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is -- versus -- for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -- BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GOF or BTZ?
Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of -- beat Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- BTZBlackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GOF or BTZ?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has higher upside potential than Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust, analysts believe Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is more attractive than Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 BTZBlackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust0 0 0 -
Is GOF or BTZ More Risky?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.871% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust has a beta of 2.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.098%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOF or BTZ?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.03%. Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust offers a yield of 6.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GOF or BTZ?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of -- is lower than Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is -- versus -- for Blackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -- BTZBlackrock Credit Allocation Income Trust-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GOF or EVV?
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GOF or EVV?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is GOF or EVV More Risky?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.871% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has a beta of 1.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.964%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOF or EVV?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.03%. Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund offers a yield of 6.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GOF or EVV?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -- EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GOF or PDI?
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- PDIPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GOF or PDI?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is more attractive than PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 PDIPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is GOF or PDI More Risky?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.871% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.54%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOF or PDI?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.03%. PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund offers a yield of 14.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GOF or PDI?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -- PDIPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GOF or PTY?
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- PTYPIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GOF or PTY?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds, analysts believe Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is more attractive than PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund0 0 0 PTYPIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds0 0 0 -
Is GOF or PTY More Risky?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.871% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds has a beta of 1.452, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.186%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOF or PTY?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.03%. PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds offers a yield of 9.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GOF or PTY?
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GOFGuggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -- PTYPIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fds-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.
