GNL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. has a net margin of -51.49% compared to Global Net Lease, Inc.'s net margin of 2.86%. Global Net Lease, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.56% beat Community Healthcare Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.3%.

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.14%. Given that Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Net Lease, Inc., analysts believe Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. is more attractive than Global Net Lease, Inc..

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. has a beta of 0.752, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.796%.

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.03%. Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. offers a yield of 11.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Global Net Lease, Inc. pays 239.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. pays out 865.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Net Lease, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121M, which are larger than Community Healthcare Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Global Net Lease, Inc.'s net income of -$62.3M is lower than Community Healthcare Trust, Inc.'s net income of $890K. Notably, Global Net Lease, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Community Healthcare Trust, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Net Lease, Inc. is 3.71x versus 3.84x for Community Healthcare Trust, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Commercial Corp. has a net margin of -51.49% compared to Global Net Lease, Inc.'s net margin of 9.88%. Global Net Lease, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.56% beat Gladstone Commercial Corp.'s return on equity of 5.96%.

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand Gladstone Commercial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.79%. Given that Gladstone Commercial Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Net Lease, Inc., analysts believe Gladstone Commercial Corp. is more attractive than Global Net Lease, Inc..

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Commercial Corp. has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.181%.

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.03%. Gladstone Commercial Corp. offers a yield of 10.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Global Net Lease, Inc. pays 239.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Commercial Corp. pays out 453.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Net Lease, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121M, which are larger than Gladstone Commercial Corp. quarterly revenues of $40.8M. Global Net Lease, Inc.'s net income of -$62.3M is lower than Gladstone Commercial Corp.'s net income of $4M. Notably, Global Net Lease, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gladstone Commercial Corp.'s PE ratio is 62.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Net Lease, Inc. is 3.71x versus 3.38x for Gladstone Commercial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. has a net margin of -51.49% compared to Global Net Lease, Inc.'s net margin of 36.55%. Global Net Lease, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.56% beat Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.93%.

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.94 which suggests that it could grow by 11.6%. Given that Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Net Lease, Inc., analysts believe Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. is more attractive than Global Net Lease, Inc..

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.53%.

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.03%. Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. offers a yield of 4.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Global Net Lease, Inc. pays 239.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. pays out 138.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Net Lease, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121M, which are smaller than Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. quarterly revenues of $253.2M. Global Net Lease, Inc.'s net income of -$62.3M is lower than Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.'s net income of $92.5M. Notably, Global Net Lease, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Net Lease, Inc. is 3.71x versus 9.13x for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

STAG Industrial, Inc. has a net margin of -51.49% compared to Global Net Lease, Inc.'s net margin of 23.5%. Global Net Lease, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.56% beat STAG Industrial, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand STAG Industrial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $41.09 which suggests that it could grow by 12.12%. Given that STAG Industrial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Net Lease, Inc., analysts believe STAG Industrial, Inc. is more attractive than Global Net Lease, Inc..

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison STAG Industrial, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.321%.

Global Net Lease, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.03%. STAG Industrial, Inc. offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Global Net Lease, Inc. pays 239.11% of its earnings as a dividend. STAG Industrial, Inc. pays out 142.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Net Lease, Inc. quarterly revenues are $121M, which are smaller than STAG Industrial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $211.1M. Global Net Lease, Inc.'s net income of -$62.3M is lower than STAG Industrial, Inc.'s net income of $49.6M. Notably, Global Net Lease, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while STAG Industrial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Net Lease, Inc. is 3.71x versus 8.27x for STAG Industrial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.