GDOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of -1.91% compared to Green Dot's net margin of 23.55%. Green Dot's return on equity of -6.4% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 7.61%.

Green Dot has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 45.41%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $45.18 which suggests that it could grow by 5.78%. Given that Green Dot has higher upside potential than Robinhood Markets, analysts believe Green Dot is more attractive than Robinhood Markets.

Green Dot has a beta of 0.887, which suggesting that the stock is 11.336% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Green Dot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Dot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Dot quarterly revenues are $409.7M, which are smaller than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $637M. Green Dot's net income of -$7.8M is lower than Robinhood Markets's net income of $150M. Notably, Green Dot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 72.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Dot is 0.32x versus 15.74x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -1.91% compared to Green Dot's net margin of 1.53%. Green Dot's return on equity of -6.4% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 40.35%.

Green Dot has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 45.41%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $33.63 which suggests that it could grow by 26.08%. Given that Green Dot has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe Green Dot is more attractive than Hut 8.

Green Dot has a beta of 0.887, which suggesting that the stock is 11.336% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.637, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 263.663%.

Green Dot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Dot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Dot quarterly revenues are $409.7M, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $42.2M. Green Dot's net income of -$7.8M is lower than Hut 8's net income of $647K. Notably, Green Dot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hut 8's PE ratio is 13.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Dot is 0.32x versus 6.95x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercard has a net margin of -1.91% compared to Green Dot's net margin of 44.28%. Green Dot's return on equity of -6.4% beat Mastercard's return on equity of 172.76%.

Green Dot has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 45.41%. On the other hand Mastercard has an analysts' consensus of $564.64 which suggests that it could grow by 10.3%. Given that Green Dot has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Green Dot is more attractive than Mastercard.

Green Dot has a beta of 0.887, which suggesting that the stock is 11.336% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.625%.

Green Dot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mastercard offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Green Dot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard pays out 19.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Green Dot quarterly revenues are $409.7M, which are smaller than Mastercard quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Green Dot's net income of -$7.8M is lower than Mastercard's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Green Dot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mastercard's PE ratio is 38.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Dot is 0.32x versus 17.52x for Mastercard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of -1.91% compared to Green Dot's net margin of 55.3%. Green Dot's return on equity of -6.4% beat Visa's return on equity of 49.9%.

Green Dot has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 45.41%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $332.92 which suggests that it could grow by 6.35%. Given that Green Dot has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Green Dot is more attractive than Visa.

Green Dot has a beta of 0.887, which suggesting that the stock is 11.336% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.315%.

Green Dot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Visa offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Green Dot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Green Dot quarterly revenues are $409.7M, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Green Dot's net income of -$7.8M is lower than Visa's net income of $5.3B. Notably, Green Dot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Visa's PE ratio is 32.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Dot is 0.32x versus 17.68x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.