GDOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dominari Holdings has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Green Dot's net margin of -104.16%. Green Dot's return on equity of -3.03% beat Dominari Holdings's return on equity of -47.35%.

Green Dot has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.12%. On the other hand Dominari Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 167.11%. Given that Dominari Holdings has higher upside potential than Green Dot, analysts believe Dominari Holdings is more attractive than Green Dot.

Green Dot has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.799% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dominari Holdings has a beta of 0.594, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.626%.

Green Dot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dominari Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Green Dot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dominari Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Dot quarterly revenues are $455M, which are larger than Dominari Holdings quarterly revenues of $4M. Green Dot's net income of $5.1M is higher than Dominari Holdings's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Green Dot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dominari Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Dot is 0.34x versus 2.04x for Dominari Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Green Dot's net margin of 36.25%. Green Dot's return on equity of -3.03% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 21.41%.

Green Dot has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.12%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $59.29 which suggests that it could grow by 8.49%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Green Dot, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Green Dot.

Green Dot has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.799% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Green Dot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Dot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Dot quarterly revenues are $455M, which are smaller than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $927M. Green Dot's net income of $5.1M is lower than Robinhood Markets's net income of $336M. Notably, Green Dot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 31.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Dot is 0.34x versus 15.43x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Green Dot's net margin of 44.79%. Green Dot's return on equity of -3.03% beat Hut 8's return on equity of -6.47%.

Green Dot has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.12%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $25.12 which suggests that it could grow by 80.82%. Given that Hut 8 has higher upside potential than Green Dot, analysts believe Hut 8 is more attractive than Green Dot.

Green Dot has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.799% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 4.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.265%.

Green Dot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Dot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Dot quarterly revenues are $455M, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of -$90.6M. Green Dot's net income of $5.1M is higher than Hut 8's net income of -$133.9M. Notably, Green Dot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hut 8's PE ratio is 4.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Dot is 0.34x versus 5.45x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercard has a net margin of 1.12% compared to Green Dot's net margin of 45.24%. Green Dot's return on equity of -3.03% beat Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12%.

Green Dot has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.12%. On the other hand Mastercard has an analysts' consensus of $614.66 which suggests that it could grow by 8.09%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Green Dot, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Green Dot.

Green Dot has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.799% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.937%.

Green Dot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mastercard offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Green Dot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Green Dot quarterly revenues are $455M, which are smaller than Mastercard quarterly revenues of $7.3B. Green Dot's net income of $5.1M is lower than Mastercard's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Green Dot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mastercard's PE ratio is 39.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Dot is 0.34x versus 18.03x for Mastercard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.