G Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Genpact Ltd.'s net margin of 16.61%. Genpact Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.06% beat Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.76%.

Genpact Ltd. has a consensus price target of $48.64, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $245.88 which suggests that it could grow by 52.78%. Given that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than Genpact Ltd., analysts believe Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than Genpact Ltd..

Genpact Ltd. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69900000000001%.

Genpact Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Genpact Ltd. pays 21.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genpact Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Genpact Ltd.'s net income of $143.1M is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $284.6M. Notably, Genpact Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.23x while Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genpact Ltd. is 1.33x versus 2.66x for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dynatrace, Inc. has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Genpact Ltd.'s net margin of 7.77%. Genpact Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.06% beat Dynatrace, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.89%.

Genpact Ltd. has a consensus price target of $48.64, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand Dynatrace, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $49.72 which suggests that it could grow by 31.92%. Given that Dynatrace, Inc. has higher upside potential than Genpact Ltd., analysts believe Dynatrace, Inc. is more attractive than Genpact Ltd..

Genpact Ltd. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynatrace, Inc. has a beta of 0.794, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.604%.

Genpact Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Dynatrace, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genpact Ltd. pays 21.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Dynatrace, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genpact Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genpact Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Dynatrace, Inc. quarterly revenues of $515.5M. Genpact Ltd.'s net income of $143.1M is higher than Dynatrace, Inc.'s net income of $40.1M. Notably, Genpact Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.23x while Dynatrace, Inc.'s PE ratio is 63.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genpact Ltd. is 1.33x versus 6.08x for Dynatrace, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EPAM Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Genpact Ltd.'s net margin of 7.77%. Genpact Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.06% beat EPAM Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.29%.

Genpact Ltd. has a consensus price target of $48.64, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand EPAM Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $191.18 which suggests that it could grow by 38.54%. Given that EPAM Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Genpact Ltd., analysts believe EPAM Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Genpact Ltd..

Genpact Ltd. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.730, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.003%.

Genpact Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. EPAM Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genpact Ltd. pays 21.74% of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genpact Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genpact Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than EPAM Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Genpact Ltd.'s net income of $143.1M is higher than EPAM Systems, Inc.'s net income of $109.4M. Notably, Genpact Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.23x while EPAM Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genpact Ltd. is 1.33x versus 1.45x for EPAM Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. has a net margin of 10.85% compared to Genpact Ltd.'s net margin of 20.13%. Genpact Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.06% beat Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.12%.

Genpact Ltd. has a consensus price target of $48.64, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $202.80 which suggests that it could grow by 28.78%. Given that Genpact Ltd. has higher upside potential than Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., analysts believe Genpact Ltd. is more attractive than Jack Henry & Associates, Inc..

Genpact Ltd. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.507% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. has a beta of 0.716, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.432%.

Genpact Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Genpact Ltd. pays 21.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. pays out 36.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genpact Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. quarterly revenues of $619.3M. Genpact Ltd.'s net income of $143.1M is higher than Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.'s net income of $124.7M. Notably, Genpact Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.23x while Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genpact Ltd. is 1.33x versus 4.71x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.