FTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Edison International has a net margin of 16.13% compared to Fortis, Inc.'s net margin of 15.44%. Fortis, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.49% beat Edison International's return on equity of 17.16%.

Fortis, Inc. has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.59%. On the other hand Edison International has an analysts' consensus of $66.36 which suggests that it could grow by 10.41%. Given that Edison International has higher upside potential than Fortis, Inc., analysts believe Edison International is more attractive than Fortis, Inc..

Fortis, Inc. has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edison International has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.667%.

Fortis, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Edison International offers a yield of 5.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Fortis, Inc. pays 73.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Edison International pays out 95.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortis, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Edison International quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Fortis, Inc.'s net income of $344.1M is lower than Edison International's net income of $888M. Notably, Fortis, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.17x while Edison International's PE ratio is 7.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis, Inc. is 2.97x versus 1.28x for Edison International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First National Energy Corp. has a net margin of 16.13% compared to Fortis, Inc.'s net margin of --. Fortis, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.49% beat First National Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -1.84%.

Fortis, Inc. has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.59%. On the other hand First National Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortis, Inc. has higher upside potential than First National Energy Corp., analysts believe Fortis, Inc. is more attractive than First National Energy Corp..

Fortis, Inc. has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First National Energy Corp. has a beta of -20.545, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2154.537%.

Fortis, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. First National Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortis, Inc. pays 73.54% of its earnings as a dividend. First National Energy Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortis, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortis, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than First National Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Fortis, Inc.'s net income of $344.1M is higher than First National Energy Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortis, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.17x while First National Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis, Inc. is 2.97x versus -- for First National Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp. has a net margin of 16.13% compared to Fortis, Inc.'s net margin of --. Fortis, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.49% beat PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Fortis, Inc. has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.59%. On the other hand PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortis, Inc. has higher upside potential than PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp., analysts believe Fortis, Inc. is more attractive than PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp..

Fortis, Inc. has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp. has a beta of 68.622, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6762.191%.

Fortis, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortis, Inc. pays 73.54% of its earnings as a dividend. PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortis, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortis, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Fortis, Inc.'s net income of $344.1M is higher than PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp.'s net income of -$947.4K. Notably, Fortis, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.17x while PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis, Inc. is 2.97x versus -- for PowerTap Hydrogen Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 16.13% compared to Fortis, Inc.'s net margin of 2.01%. Fortis, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.49% beat NRG Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 59.88%.

Fortis, Inc. has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.59%. On the other hand NRG Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $201.58 which suggests that it could grow by 29.05%. Given that NRG Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fortis, Inc., analysts believe NRG Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Fortis, Inc..

Fortis, Inc. has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.158%.

Fortis, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. NRG Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Fortis, Inc. pays 73.54% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc. pays out 32.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortis, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than NRG Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Fortis, Inc.'s net income of $344.1M is higher than NRG Energy, Inc.'s net income of $152M. Notably, Fortis, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.17x while NRG Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis, Inc. is 2.97x versus 1.04x for NRG Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.