FLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Flowers Foods's net margin of 18.32%. Flowers Foods's return on equity of 17.46% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 224.09%.

Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $149.83 which suggests that it could grow by 14.1%. Given that Flowers Foods has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Flowers Foods is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.809%.

Flowers Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Flowers Foods pays 158.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Flowers Foods's is not.

Flowers Foods quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $5B. Flowers Foods's net income of $65M is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $907M. Notably, Flowers Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.95x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 17.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowers Foods is 0.85x versus 2.21x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McCormick & has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Flowers Foods's net margin of 11.21%. Flowers Foods's return on equity of 17.46% beat McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.38%.

Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand McCormick & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.67%. Given that Flowers Foods has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Flowers Foods is more attractive than McCormick &.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.516%.

Flowers Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. McCormick & offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Flowers Foods pays 158.18% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & pays out 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Flowers Foods's is not.

Flowers Foods quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than McCormick & quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Flowers Foods's net income of $65M is lower than McCormick &'s net income of $184.2M. Notably, Flowers Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.95x while McCormick &'s PE ratio is 26.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowers Foods is 0.85x versus 3.18x for McCormick &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Flowers Foods's net margin of --. Flowers Foods's return on equity of 17.46% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flowers Foods has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Flowers Foods is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.048%.

Flowers Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowers Foods pays 158.18% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flowers Foods quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Flowers Foods's net income of $65M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Flowers Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.95x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowers Foods is 0.85x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Flowers Foods's net margin of 3.7%. Flowers Foods's return on equity of 17.46% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.76%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Flowers Foods, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Flowers Foods.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

Flowers Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Flowers Foods pays 158.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Flowers Foods's is not.

Flowers Foods quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Flowers Foods's net income of $65M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Flowers Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.95x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowers Foods is 0.85x versus 0.88x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.