FET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Drilling Tools International has a net margin of -7.13% compared to Forum Energy Technologies's net margin of 2.16%. Forum Energy Technologies's return on equity of -11.24% beat Drilling Tools International's return on equity of 8.5%.

Forum Energy Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 82.82%. On the other hand Drilling Tools International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 73.91%. Given that Forum Energy Technologies has higher upside potential than Drilling Tools International, analysts believe Forum Energy Technologies is more attractive than Drilling Tools International.

Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 2.403, which suggesting that the stock is 140.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Drilling Tools International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Forum Energy Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Drilling Tools International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forum Energy Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Drilling Tools International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forum Energy Technologies quarterly revenues are $207.8M, which are larger than Drilling Tools International quarterly revenues of $40.1M. Forum Energy Technologies's net income of -$14.8M is lower than Drilling Tools International's net income of $867K. Notably, Forum Energy Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Drilling Tools International's PE ratio is 12.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forum Energy Technologies is 0.24x versus 0.71x for Drilling Tools International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Geospace Technologies has a net margin of -7.13% compared to Forum Energy Technologies's net margin of -36.29%. Forum Energy Technologies's return on equity of -11.24% beat Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -4.74%.

Forum Energy Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 82.82%. On the other hand Geospace Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forum Energy Technologies has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Forum Energy Technologies is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 2.403, which suggesting that the stock is 140.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.361%.

Forum Energy Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Geospace Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forum Energy Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Geospace Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forum Energy Technologies quarterly revenues are $207.8M, which are larger than Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues of $35.4M. Forum Energy Technologies's net income of -$14.8M is lower than Geospace Technologies's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, Forum Energy Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Geospace Technologies's PE ratio is 13.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forum Energy Technologies is 0.24x versus 0.97x for Geospace Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Gas Services Group has a net margin of -7.13% compared to Forum Energy Technologies's net margin of 12.32%. Forum Energy Technologies's return on equity of -11.24% beat Natural Gas Services Group's return on equity of 6.65%.

Forum Energy Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 82.82%. On the other hand Natural Gas Services Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.27%. Given that Forum Energy Technologies has higher upside potential than Natural Gas Services Group, analysts believe Forum Energy Technologies is more attractive than Natural Gas Services Group.

Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 2.403, which suggesting that the stock is 140.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.829%.

Forum Energy Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Gas Services Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forum Energy Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Gas Services Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forum Energy Technologies quarterly revenues are $207.8M, which are larger than Natural Gas Services Group quarterly revenues of $40.7M. Forum Energy Technologies's net income of -$14.8M is lower than Natural Gas Services Group's net income of $5M. Notably, Forum Energy Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Natural Gas Services Group's PE ratio is 20.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forum Energy Technologies is 0.24x versus 2.20x for Natural Gas Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NOV has a net margin of -7.13% compared to Forum Energy Technologies's net margin of 5.93%. Forum Energy Technologies's return on equity of -11.24% beat NOV's return on equity of 17.26%.

Forum Energy Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 82.82%. On the other hand NOV has an analysts' consensus of $20.13 which suggests that it could grow by 33.44%. Given that Forum Energy Technologies has higher upside potential than NOV, analysts believe Forum Energy Technologies is more attractive than NOV.

Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 2.403, which suggesting that the stock is 140.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NOV has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.576%.

Forum Energy Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NOV offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Forum Energy Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NOV pays out 7.96% of its earnings as a dividend. NOV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Forum Energy Technologies quarterly revenues are $207.8M, which are smaller than NOV quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Forum Energy Technologies's net income of -$14.8M is lower than NOV's net income of $130M. Notably, Forum Energy Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NOV's PE ratio is 5.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forum Energy Technologies is 0.24x versus 0.66x for NOV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.