ESTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Datadog has a net margin of -4.46% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 3.24%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -17.14% beat Datadog's return on equity of 6.44%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $127.86, signalling upside risk potential of 48.27%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $135.54 which suggests that it could grow by 25.64%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Datadog, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Datadog.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.945%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $382.1M, which are smaller than Datadog quarterly revenues of $761.6M. Elastic NV's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Datadog's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Datadog's PE ratio is 234.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 6.22x versus 13.70x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -4.46% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 36.86%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -17.14% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $127.86, signalling upside risk potential of 48.27%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $505.59 which suggests that it could grow by 15.24%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Microsoft.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $382.1M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Elastic NV's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 33.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 6.22x versus 12.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -4.46% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 20.78%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -17.14% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $127.86, signalling upside risk potential of 48.27%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $178.12 which suggests that it could grow by 18.48%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Oracle.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.667%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $382.1M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Elastic NV's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Oracle's PE ratio is 35.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 6.22x versus 7.70x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of -4.46% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of -33.19%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -17.14% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -32.41%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $127.86, signalling upside risk potential of 48.27%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $195.17 which suggests that it could grow by 12.08%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Snowflake.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $382.1M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $986.8M. Elastic NV's net income of -$17.1M is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$327.5M. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 6.22x versus 15.98x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.