ENOV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of -125.38% compared to Enovis's net margin of -2.72%. Enovis's return on equity of -25.93% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97%.

Enovis has a consensus price target of $64.50, signalling upside risk potential of 65.9%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 166.67%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Enovis, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Enovis.

Enovis has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.935% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.703, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.295%.

Enovis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enovis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enovis quarterly revenues are $561M, which are larger than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $33.6M. Enovis's net income of -$703.3M is lower than Broadwind's net income of -$914K. Notably, Enovis's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 28.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enovis is 1.02x versus 0.23x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Federal Signal has a net margin of -125.38% compared to Enovis's net margin of 10.59%. Enovis's return on equity of -25.93% beat Federal Signal's return on equity of 19.73%.

Enovis has a consensus price target of $64.50, signalling upside risk potential of 65.9%. On the other hand Federal Signal has an analysts' consensus of $104.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.85%. Given that Enovis has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe Enovis is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Enovis has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.935% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federal Signal has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.481%.

Enovis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Federal Signal offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Enovis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal pays out 13.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enovis quarterly revenues are $561M, which are larger than Federal Signal quarterly revenues of $472M. Enovis's net income of -$703.3M is lower than Federal Signal's net income of $50M. Notably, Enovis's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Federal Signal's PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enovis is 1.02x versus 2.61x for Federal Signal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -125.38% compared to Enovis's net margin of -814.55%. Enovis's return on equity of -25.93% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Enovis has a consensus price target of $64.50, signalling upside risk potential of 65.9%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enovis has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Enovis is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Enovis has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.935% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.665%.

Enovis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enovis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enovis quarterly revenues are $561M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Enovis's net income of -$703.3M is lower than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Enovis's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enovis is 1.02x versus 7.76x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -125.38% compared to Enovis's net margin of -11.09%. Enovis's return on equity of -25.93% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Enovis has a consensus price target of $64.50, signalling upside risk potential of 65.9%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 336.57%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Enovis, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Enovis.

Enovis has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.935% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.953%.

Enovis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enovis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enovis quarterly revenues are $561M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Enovis's net income of -$703.3M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Enovis's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enovis is 1.02x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.