EFXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of -9.09% compared to Enerflex Ltd.'s net margin of 10.41%. Enerflex Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.38, signalling downside risk potential of -20.9%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $36.34 which suggests that it could grow by 1.76%. Given that Halliburton Co. has higher upside potential than Enerflex Ltd., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Enerflex Ltd..

Enerflex Ltd. has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.348% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.896%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Enerflex Ltd. pays 21.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enerflex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $627M, which are smaller than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Enerflex Ltd.'s net income of -$57M is lower than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M. Notably, Enerflex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.25x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 23.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enerflex Ltd. is 1.11x versus 1.37x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Helium Ltd. has a net margin of -9.09% compared to Enerflex Ltd.'s net margin of -510.34%. Enerflex Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Royal Helium Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.33%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.38, signalling downside risk potential of -20.9%. On the other hand Royal Helium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enerflex Ltd. has higher upside potential than Royal Helium Ltd., analysts believe Enerflex Ltd. is more attractive than Royal Helium Ltd..

Enerflex Ltd. has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.348% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Helium Ltd. has a beta of 4.437, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 343.705%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Royal Helium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enerflex Ltd. pays 21.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Helium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enerflex Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enerflex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $627M, which are larger than Royal Helium Ltd. quarterly revenues of $494.4K. Enerflex Ltd.'s net income of -$57M is lower than Royal Helium Ltd.'s net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Enerflex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.25x while Royal Helium Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enerflex Ltd. is 1.11x versus 0.00x for Royal Helium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has a net margin of -9.09% compared to Enerflex Ltd.'s net margin of -2.08%. Enerflex Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.69%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.38, signalling downside risk potential of -20.9%. On the other hand Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $66.70 which suggests that it could grow by 30.89%. Given that Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enerflex Ltd., analysts believe Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Enerflex Ltd..

Enerflex Ltd. has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.348% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.206%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Enerflex Ltd. pays 21.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. pays out 72.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enerflex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $627M, which are larger than Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues of $179.7M. Enerflex Ltd.'s net income of -$57M is lower than Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Enerflex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.25x while Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.'s PE ratio is 74.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enerflex Ltd. is 1.11x versus 3.56x for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strata Power Corp. has a net margin of -9.09% compared to Enerflex Ltd.'s net margin of -48.93%. Enerflex Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Strata Power Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Enerflex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.38, signalling downside risk potential of -20.9%. On the other hand Strata Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enerflex Ltd. has higher upside potential than Strata Power Corp., analysts believe Enerflex Ltd. is more attractive than Strata Power Corp..

Enerflex Ltd. has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.348% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power Corp. has a beta of 1.539, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.904%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Strata Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enerflex Ltd. pays 21.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enerflex Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enerflex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $627M, which are larger than Strata Power Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Enerflex Ltd.'s net income of -$57M is lower than Strata Power Corp.'s net income of $6.3K. Notably, Enerflex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.25x while Strata Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enerflex Ltd. is 1.11x versus -- for Strata Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.