EFXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TechnipFMC plc has a net margin of -9.09% compared to Enerflex Ltd.'s net margin of 9.76%. Enerflex Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat TechnipFMC plc's return on equity of 29.61%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.38, signalling downside risk potential of -8.99%. On the other hand TechnipFMC plc has an analysts' consensus of $64.33 which suggests that it could fall by -9.42%. Given that TechnipFMC plc has more downside risk than Enerflex Ltd., analysts believe Enerflex Ltd. is more attractive than TechnipFMC plc.

Enerflex Ltd. has a beta of 1.364, which suggesting that the stock is 36.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC plc has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.772%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. TechnipFMC plc offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Enerflex Ltd. pays 21.3% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC plc pays out 8.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enerflex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $627M, which are smaller than TechnipFMC plc quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Enerflex Ltd.'s net income of -$57M is lower than TechnipFMC plc's net income of $244.6M. Notably, Enerflex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.80x while TechnipFMC plc's PE ratio is 31.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enerflex Ltd. is 0.98x versus 3.05x for TechnipFMC plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of -9.09% compared to Enerflex Ltd.'s net margin of 10.41%. Enerflex Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.38, signalling downside risk potential of -8.99%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $37.34 which suggests that it could fall by -2.18%. Given that Enerflex Ltd. has more downside risk than Halliburton Co., analysts believe Halliburton Co. is more attractive than Enerflex Ltd..

Enerflex Ltd. has a beta of 1.364, which suggesting that the stock is 36.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.538%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Enerflex Ltd. pays 21.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enerflex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $627M, which are smaller than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Enerflex Ltd.'s net income of -$57M is lower than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M. Notably, Enerflex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.80x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 25.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enerflex Ltd. is 0.98x versus 1.47x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strata Power Corp. has a net margin of -9.09% compared to Enerflex Ltd.'s net margin of -48.93%. Enerflex Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Strata Power Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Enerflex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.38, signalling downside risk potential of -8.99%. On the other hand Strata Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enerflex Ltd. has higher upside potential than Strata Power Corp., analysts believe Enerflex Ltd. is more attractive than Strata Power Corp..

Enerflex Ltd. has a beta of 1.364, which suggesting that the stock is 36.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power Corp. has a beta of 1.663, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.327%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Strata Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enerflex Ltd. pays 21.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enerflex Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enerflex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $627M, which are larger than Strata Power Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Enerflex Ltd.'s net income of -$57M is lower than Strata Power Corp.'s net income of $6.3K. Notably, Enerflex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.80x while Strata Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enerflex Ltd. is 0.98x versus -- for Strata Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weatherford International plc has a net margin of -9.09% compared to Enerflex Ltd.'s net margin of 10.78%. Enerflex Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Weatherford International plc's return on equity of 30.77%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.38, signalling downside risk potential of -8.99%. On the other hand Weatherford International plc has an analysts' consensus of $108.25 which suggests that it could grow by 13.6%. Given that Weatherford International plc has higher upside potential than Enerflex Ltd., analysts believe Weatherford International plc is more attractive than Enerflex Ltd..

Enerflex Ltd. has a beta of 1.364, which suggesting that the stock is 36.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weatherford International plc has a beta of 0.794, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.6%.

Enerflex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Weatherford International plc offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Enerflex Ltd. pays 21.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Weatherford International plc pays out 16.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enerflex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $627M, which are smaller than Weatherford International plc quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Enerflex Ltd.'s net income of -$57M is lower than Weatherford International plc's net income of $139M. Notably, Enerflex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.80x while Weatherford International plc's PE ratio is 16.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enerflex Ltd. is 0.98x versus 1.41x for Weatherford International plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.