EEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Omnicom Group, Inc. has a net margin of -18.58% compared to Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net margin of 8.93%. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.19% beat Omnicom Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.74%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 64.57%. On the other hand Omnicom Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $101.10 which suggests that it could grow by 46.52%. Given that Emerald Holding, Inc. has higher upside potential than Omnicom Group, Inc., analysts believe Emerald Holding, Inc. is more attractive than Omnicom Group, Inc..

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omnicom Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.742, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.848%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Omnicom Group, Inc. offers a yield of 4.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Emerald Holding, Inc. pays -668.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group, Inc. pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Omnicom Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emerald Holding, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.5M, which are smaller than Omnicom Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4B. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than Omnicom Group, Inc.'s net income of $360.4M. Notably, Emerald Holding, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 220.83x while Omnicom Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerald Holding, Inc. is 2.18x versus 0.85x for Omnicom Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stagwell, Inc. has a net margin of -18.58% compared to Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net margin of 3.21%. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.19% beat Stagwell, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.8%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 64.57%. On the other hand Stagwell, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.25 which suggests that it could grow by 67.34%. Given that Stagwell, Inc. has higher upside potential than Emerald Holding, Inc., analysts believe Stagwell, Inc. is more attractive than Emerald Holding, Inc..

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stagwell, Inc. has a beta of 1.686, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.629%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Stagwell, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerald Holding, Inc. pays -668.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Stagwell, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerald Holding, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.5M, which are smaller than Stagwell, Inc. quarterly revenues of $740.4M. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than Stagwell, Inc.'s net income of $23.8M. Notably, Emerald Holding, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 220.83x while Stagwell, Inc.'s PE ratio is 64.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerald Holding, Inc. is 2.18x versus 0.32x for Stagwell, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis, Inc. has a net margin of -18.58% compared to Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net margin of -0.99%. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.19% beat Ziff Davis, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.15%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 64.57%. On the other hand Ziff Davis, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.43 which suggests that it could grow by 42.39%. Given that Emerald Holding, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ziff Davis, Inc., analysts believe Emerald Holding, Inc. is more attractive than Ziff Davis, Inc..

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis, Inc. has a beta of 1.464, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.435%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Ziff Davis, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerald Holding, Inc. pays -668.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerald Holding, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.5M, which are smaller than Ziff Davis, Inc. quarterly revenues of $363.7M. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than Ziff Davis, Inc.'s net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Emerald Holding, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 220.83x while Ziff Davis, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerald Holding, Inc. is 2.18x versus 0.91x for Ziff Davis, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.