EEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. has a net margin of -18.58% compared to Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net margin of -2.47%. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.19% beat Dolphin Entertainment, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.61%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 75.62%. On the other hand Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 220.51%. Given that Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. has higher upside potential than Emerald Holding, Inc., analysts believe Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. is more attractive than Emerald Holding, Inc..

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a beta of 0.688, which suggesting that the stock is 31.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. has a beta of 2.556, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.611%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerald Holding, Inc. pays -668.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerald Holding, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.5M, which are larger than Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.8M. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than Dolphin Entertainment, Inc.'s net income of -$365.5K. Notably, Emerald Holding, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 206.94x while Dolphin Entertainment, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerald Holding, Inc. is 2.04x versus 0.33x for Dolphin Entertainment, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lendway, Inc. has a net margin of -18.58% compared to Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net margin of -65.3%. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.19% beat Lendway, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.24%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 75.62%. On the other hand Lendway, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Emerald Holding, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lendway, Inc., analysts believe Emerald Holding, Inc. is more attractive than Lendway, Inc..

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a beta of 0.688, which suggesting that the stock is 31.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway, Inc. has a beta of 2.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.333%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Lendway, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerald Holding, Inc. pays -668.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerald Holding, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.5M, which are larger than Lendway, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than Lendway, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Emerald Holding, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 206.94x while Lendway, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerald Holding, Inc. is 2.04x versus 0.13x for Lendway, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite, Inc. has a net margin of -18.58% compared to Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net margin of 11.18%. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.19% beat Magnite, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.6%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 75.62%. On the other hand Magnite, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.86 which suggests that it could grow by 65.48%. Given that Emerald Holding, Inc. has higher upside potential than Magnite, Inc., analysts believe Emerald Holding, Inc. is more attractive than Magnite, Inc..

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a beta of 0.688, which suggesting that the stock is 31.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite, Inc. has a beta of 2.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.308%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Magnite, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerald Holding, Inc. pays -668.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerald Holding, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.5M, which are smaller than Magnite, Inc. quarterly revenues of $179.5M. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than Magnite, Inc.'s net income of $20.1M. Notably, Emerald Holding, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 206.94x while Magnite, Inc.'s PE ratio is 43.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerald Holding, Inc. is 2.04x versus 3.44x for Magnite, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis, Inc. has a net margin of -18.58% compared to Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net margin of -0.99%. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.19% beat Ziff Davis, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.15%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 75.62%. On the other hand Ziff Davis, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.43 which suggests that it could grow by 23.55%. Given that Emerald Holding, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ziff Davis, Inc., analysts believe Emerald Holding, Inc. is more attractive than Ziff Davis, Inc..

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a beta of 0.688, which suggesting that the stock is 31.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis, Inc. has a beta of 1.444, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.409%.

Emerald Holding, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Ziff Davis, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerald Holding, Inc. pays -668.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerald Holding, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.5M, which are smaller than Ziff Davis, Inc. quarterly revenues of $363.7M. Emerald Holding, Inc.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than Ziff Davis, Inc.'s net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Emerald Holding, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 206.94x while Ziff Davis, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerald Holding, Inc. is 2.04x versus 1.05x for Ziff Davis, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.