DX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance has a net margin of -34.02% compared to Dynex Capital's net margin of 37.91%. Dynex Capital's return on equity of 6.17% beat Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 0.56%.

Dynex Capital has a consensus price target of $13.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.08%. On the other hand Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance has an analysts' consensus of $9.80 which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dynex Capital has higher upside potential than Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, analysts believe Dynex Capital is more attractive than Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance.

Dynex Capital has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance has a beta of 1.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.098%.

Dynex Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.73%. Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance offers a yield of 11.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Dynex Capital pays 103.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance pays out -165.69% of its earnings as a dividend.

Dynex Capital quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance quarterly revenues of $68.6M. Dynex Capital's net income of -$3.1M is lower than Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance's net income of $26M. Notably, Dynex Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance's PE ratio is 164.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynex Capital is 9.15x versus 7.58x for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings has a net margin of -34.02% compared to Dynex Capital's net margin of 15.94%. Dynex Capital's return on equity of 6.17% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.4%.

Dynex Capital has a consensus price target of $13.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.08%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dynex Capital has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Dynex Capital is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Dynex Capital has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.593, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.75%.

Dynex Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.73%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dynex Capital pays 103.47% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dynex Capital quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.5M. Dynex Capital's net income of -$3.1M is lower than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Dynex Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 80.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynex Capital is 9.15x versus 12.44x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AG Mortgage Investment Trust has a net margin of -34.02% compared to Dynex Capital's net margin of 66.37%. Dynex Capital's return on equity of 6.17% beat AG Mortgage Investment Trust's return on equity of 8.58%.

Dynex Capital has a consensus price target of $13.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.08%. On the other hand AG Mortgage Investment Trust has an analysts' consensus of $15.54 which suggests that it could grow by 125.24%. Given that AG Mortgage Investment Trust has higher upside potential than Dynex Capital, analysts believe AG Mortgage Investment Trust is more attractive than Dynex Capital.

Dynex Capital has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AG Mortgage Investment Trust has a beta of 1.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.381%.

Dynex Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.73%. AG Mortgage Investment Trust offers a yield of 11.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Dynex Capital pays 103.47% of its earnings as a dividend. AG Mortgage Investment Trust pays out 66.72% of its earnings as a dividend. AG Mortgage Investment Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dynex Capital's is not.

Dynex Capital quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than AG Mortgage Investment Trust quarterly revenues of $17.3M. Dynex Capital's net income of -$3.1M is lower than AG Mortgage Investment Trust's net income of $11.5M. Notably, Dynex Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while AG Mortgage Investment Trust's PE ratio is 7.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynex Capital is 9.15x versus 3.02x for AG Mortgage Investment Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of -34.02% compared to Dynex Capital's net margin of -2883.88%. Dynex Capital's return on equity of 6.17% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of --.

Dynex Capital has a consensus price target of $13.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.08%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dynex Capital has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Dynex Capital is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Dynex Capital has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Dynex Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.73%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dynex Capital pays 103.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dynex Capital quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $81.2K. Dynex Capital's net income of -$3.1M is lower than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Dynex Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dynex Capital is 9.15x versus 3.19x for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.