DDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GoPro has a net margin of -30.36% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -18.51%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -78.83% beat GoPro's return on equity of -166.14%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 6.91%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than GoPro, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than GoPro.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.012%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $111M, which are smaller than GoPro quarterly revenues of $200.9M. 3D Systems's net income of -$33.7M is higher than GoPro's net income of -$37.2M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.67x versus 0.12x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Immersion has a net margin of -30.36% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of 3.26%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -78.83% beat Immersion's return on equity of 24.27%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Immersion has an analysts' consensus of $12.25 which suggests that it could grow by 67.81%. Given that Immersion has higher upside potential than 3D Systems, analysts believe Immersion is more attractive than 3D Systems.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immersion has a beta of 1.401, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.06%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Immersion offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Immersion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $111M, which are smaller than Immersion quarterly revenues of $474.8M. 3D Systems's net income of -$33.7M is lower than Immersion's net income of $15.5M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Immersion's PE ratio is 2.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.67x versus 0.19x for Immersion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Juniper Networks has a net margin of -30.36% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of 5.01%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -78.83% beat Juniper Networks's return on equity of 7.59%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Juniper Networks has an analysts' consensus of $39.89 which suggests that it could grow by 9.89%. Given that 3D Systems has higher upside potential than Juniper Networks, analysts believe 3D Systems is more attractive than Juniper Networks.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.578%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Juniper Networks offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Juniper Networks pays out 100.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $111M, which are smaller than Juniper Networks quarterly revenues of $1.3B. 3D Systems's net income of -$33.7M is lower than Juniper Networks's net income of $64.1M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Juniper Networks's PE ratio is 34.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.67x versus 2.35x for Juniper Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transact Technologies has a net margin of -30.36% compared to 3D Systems's net margin of -77.77%. 3D Systems's return on equity of -78.83% beat Transact Technologies's return on equity of -26.59%.

3D Systems has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Transact Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 83.42%. Given that Transact Technologies has higher upside potential than 3D Systems, analysts believe Transact Technologies is more attractive than 3D Systems.

3D Systems has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transact Technologies has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.695%.

3D Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transact Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3D Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transact Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

3D Systems quarterly revenues are $111M, which are larger than Transact Technologies quarterly revenues of $10.2M. 3D Systems's net income of -$33.7M is lower than Transact Technologies's net income of -$8M. Notably, 3D Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Transact Technologies's PE ratio is 87.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3D Systems is 0.67x versus 0.85x for Transact Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.