Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
44
CWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.03
Seasonality move
:
-9.45%
Day range:
$12.60 - $13.29
52-week range:
$9.24 - $16.11
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
35.38x
P/S ratio:
0.32x
P/B ratio:
1.76x
Volume:
4.2M
Avg. volume:
1.5M
1-year change:
25.62%
Market cap:
$3B
Revenue:
$9.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.37
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield PLC
|
$2.4B | $0.21 | 4.31% | 61.27% | -- |
|
AEI
Alset
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EXPI
eXp World Holdings
|
$1.3B | $0.12 | 6.99% | -89.29% | -- |
|
FRPH
FRP Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RMR
The RMR Group
|
$220.4M | $0.38 | 6.48% | -12.2% | -- |
|
SGD
Safe & Green Development
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield PLC
|
$13.09 | -- | $3B | 35.38x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.32x |
|
AEI
Alset
|
$1.00 | -- | $9.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.70x |
|
EXPI
eXp World Holdings
|
$12.82 | -- | $2B | -- | $0.05 | 1.56% | 0.44x |
|
FRPH
FRP Holdings
|
$30.06 | -- | $572.1M | 75.15x | $0.00 | 0% | 13.77x |
|
RMR
The RMR Group
|
$20.29 | -- | $341.8M | 14.92x | $0.45 | 8.63% | 0.54x |
|
SGD
Safe & Green Development
|
$2.28 | -- | $3.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield PLC
|
64.5% | 1.660 | 98.91% | 1.08x |
|
AEI
Alset
|
1.68% | 3.296 | 6.83% | 16.52x |
|
EXPI
eXp World Holdings
|
-- | 1.404 | -- | 1.06x |
|
FRPH
FRP Holdings
|
29.82% | 0.968 | 29.1% | 15.24x |
|
RMR
The RMR Group
|
26.64% | -0.267 | 14.15% | 2.07x |
|
SGD
Safe & Green Development
|
93.56% | 2.690 | 147.75% | 0.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield PLC
|
$432.4M | $89.3M | 1.83% | 5.37% | 3.81% | $186.7M |
|
AEI
Alset
|
$2M | -$204.2K | -36.5% | -36.82% | 29.81% | -$2.9M |
|
EXPI
eXp World Holdings
|
$87.7M | $9.7M | -14.35% | -14.35% | 0.79% | $43.7M |
|
FRPH
FRP Holdings
|
$9.8M | $3.1M | 1.2% | 1.68% | 23.96% | $6.3M |
|
RMR
The RMR Group
|
$77.1M | $12.2M | 5.22% | 5.47% | 8.67% | -$6.9M |
|
SGD
Safe & Green Development
|
-- | -$1.4M | -- | -- | -1712.55% | -$484.3K |
Cushman & Wakefield PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CWK or AEI?
Alset has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net margin of 34.6%. Cushman & Wakefield PLC's return on equity of 5.37% beat Alset's return on equity of -36.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC18.45% $0.14 $4.8B AEIAlset40.54% $0.19 $94.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CWK or AEI?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand Alset has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cushman & Wakefield PLC has higher upside potential than Alset, analysts believe Cushman & Wakefield PLC is more attractive than Alset.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC0 0 0 AEIAlset0 0 0 -
Is CWK or AEI More Risky?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.945% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alset has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWK or AEI?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alset offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cushman & Wakefield PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alset pays out -0.37% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWK or AEI?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Alset quarterly revenues of $5M. Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net income of $33.7M is higher than Alset's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Cushman & Wakefield PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.38x while Alset's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cushman & Wakefield PLC is 0.32x versus 0.70x for Alset. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC0.32x 35.38x $2.3B $33.7M AEIAlset0.70x -- $5M $1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWK or EXPI?
eXp World Holdings has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net margin of -0.69%. Cushman & Wakefield PLC's return on equity of 5.37% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -14.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC18.45% $0.14 $4.8B EXPIeXp World Holdings7.12% -$0.06 $211.1M -
What do Analysts Say About CWK or EXPI?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.86%. Given that eXp World Holdings has higher upside potential than Cushman & Wakefield PLC, analysts believe eXp World Holdings is more attractive than Cushman & Wakefield PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC0 0 0 EXPIeXp World Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CWK or EXPI More Risky?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.945% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.421%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWK or EXPI?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cushman & Wakefield PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -317.83% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWK or EXPI?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net income of $33.7M is higher than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Cushman & Wakefield PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.38x while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cushman & Wakefield PLC is 0.32x versus 0.44x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC0.32x 35.38x $2.3B $33.7M EXPIeXp World Holdings0.44x -- $1.2B -$8.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWK or FRPH?
FRP Holdings has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net margin of 12.8%. Cushman & Wakefield PLC's return on equity of 5.37% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC18.45% $0.14 $4.8B FRPHFRP Holdings92.01% $0.07 $645.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CWK or FRPH?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cushman & Wakefield PLC has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Cushman & Wakefield PLC is more attractive than FRP Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC0 0 0 FRPHFRP Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CWK or FRPH More Risky?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.945% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.496, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.4%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWK or FRPH?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cushman & Wakefield PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWK or FRPH?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net income of $33.7M is higher than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Cushman & Wakefield PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.38x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 75.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cushman & Wakefield PLC is 0.32x versus 13.77x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC0.32x 35.38x $2.3B $33.7M FRPHFRP Holdings13.77x 75.15x $10.6M $1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWK or RMR?
The RMR Group has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net margin of 2.51%. Cushman & Wakefield PLC's return on equity of 5.37% beat The RMR Group's return on equity of 5.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC18.45% $0.14 $4.8B RMRThe RMR Group36.26% $0.32 $505.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CWK or RMR?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand The RMR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 35.54%. Given that The RMR Group has higher upside potential than Cushman & Wakefield PLC, analysts believe The RMR Group is more attractive than Cushman & Wakefield PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC0 0 0 RMRThe RMR Group1 3 0 -
Is CWK or RMR More Risky?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.945% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The RMR Group has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.859%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWK or RMR?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The RMR Group offers a yield of 8.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Cushman & Wakefield PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The RMR Group pays out 122.88% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWK or RMR?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than The RMR Group quarterly revenues of $212.7M. Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net income of $33.7M is higher than The RMR Group's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Cushman & Wakefield PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.38x while The RMR Group's PE ratio is 14.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cushman & Wakefield PLC is 0.32x versus 0.54x for The RMR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC0.32x 35.38x $2.3B $33.7M RMRThe RMR Group0.54x 14.92x $212.7M $5.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWK or SGD?
Safe & Green Development has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net margin of -2883.88%. Cushman & Wakefield PLC's return on equity of 5.37% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC18.45% $0.14 $4.8B SGDSafe & Green Development-- -$52.20 $9.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CWK or SGD?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cushman & Wakefield PLC has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Cushman & Wakefield PLC is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC0 0 0 SGDSafe & Green Development0 0 0 -
Is CWK or SGD More Risky?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.945% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWK or SGD?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cushman & Wakefield PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWK or SGD?
Cushman & Wakefield PLC quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $81.2K. Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net income of $33.7M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Cushman & Wakefield PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.38x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cushman & Wakefield PLC is 0.32x versus -- for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWKCushman & Wakefield PLC0.32x 35.38x $2.3B $33.7M SGDSafe & Green Development-- -- $81.2K -$2.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is down 0.37% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 7.53% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 6.19% over the past day.
