CWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cousins Properties, Inc. has a net margin of -0.77% compared to Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s net margin of -1.29%. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.74% beat Cousins Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.86%.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.63, signalling upside risk potential of 39.77%. On the other hand Cousins Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $31.25 which suggests that it could grow by 30.43%. Given that Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cousins Properties, Inc., analysts believe Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is more attractive than Cousins Properties, Inc..

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.872% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cousins Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.022%.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cousins Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cousins Properties, Inc. pays out 533.11% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Cousins Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $255M. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s net income of -$22.4M is lower than Cousins Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.45x while Cousins Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 99.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is 0.30x versus 4.06x for Cousins Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eXp World Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.77% compared to Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s net margin of 0.27%. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.74% beat eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.35%.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.63, signalling upside risk potential of 39.77%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 73.1%. Given that eXp World Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cushman & Wakefield Ltd., analysts believe eXp World Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Cushman & Wakefield Ltd..

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.872% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.687%.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eXp World Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings, Inc. pays out 179.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than eXp World Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s net income of -$22.4M is lower than eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.5M. Notably, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.45x while eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is 0.30x versus 0.25x for eXp World Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a net margin of -0.77% compared to Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s net margin of 5.28%. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.74% beat Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.02%.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.63, signalling upside risk potential of 39.77%. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $385.20 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has higher upside potential than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc., analysts believe Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is more attractive than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc..

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.872% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.458%.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s net income of -$22.4M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s net income of $401.8M. Notably, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.45x while Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is 0.30x versus 0.58x for Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Global Services Group has a net margin of -0.77% compared to Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s net margin of --. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.74% beat Resources Global Services Group's return on equity of --.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.63, signalling upside risk potential of 39.77%. On the other hand Resources Global Services Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has higher upside potential than Resources Global Services Group, analysts believe Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is more attractive than Resources Global Services Group.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.872% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Global Services Group has a beta of -7.137, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 813.693%.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Global Services Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Global Services Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Resources Global Services Group quarterly revenues of --. Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s net income of -$22.4M is higher than Resources Global Services Group's net income of --. Notably, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.45x while Resources Global Services Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is 0.30x versus 20,661.35x for Resources Global Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.