CUBE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. has a net margin of 28.91% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 18.4%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 12.26% beat Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.33%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $147.60 which suggests that it could grow by 7.39%. Given that CubeSmart has higher upside potential than Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc., analysts believe CubeSmart is more attractive than Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc..

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.518%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. offers a yield of 4.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.52 per share. CubeSmart pays 119.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. pays out 132.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $285.1M, which are smaller than Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. quarterly revenues of $554.4M. CubeSmart's net income of $82.4M is lower than Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.'s net income of $102M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.99x while Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 7.41x versus 7.30x for Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Public Storage has a net margin of 28.91% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 42.06%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 12.26% beat Public Storage's return on equity of 19.82%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Public Storage has an analysts' consensus of $319.10 which suggests that it could grow by 21.76%. Given that Public Storage has higher upside potential than CubeSmart, analysts believe Public Storage is more attractive than CubeSmart.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Public Storage has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.192%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. Public Storage offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. CubeSmart pays 119.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Public Storage pays out 112.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $285.1M, which are smaller than Public Storage quarterly revenues of $1.2B. CubeSmart's net income of $82.4M is lower than Public Storage's net income of $514.8M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.99x while Public Storage's PE ratio is 27.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 7.41x versus 9.63x for Public Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers Corp. has a net margin of 28.91% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 29.06%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 12.26% beat Regency Centers Corp.'s return on equity of 6.08%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Regency Centers Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $79.15 which suggests that it could grow by 13.8%. Given that CubeSmart has higher upside potential than Regency Centers Corp., analysts believe CubeSmart is more attractive than Regency Centers Corp..

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers Corp. has a beta of 0.931, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.901%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. Regency Centers Corp. offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. CubeSmart pays 119.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers Corp. pays out 128.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $285.1M, which are smaller than Regency Centers Corp. quarterly revenues of $387.5M. CubeSmart's net income of $82.4M is lower than Regency Centers Corp.'s net income of $112.6M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.99x while Regency Centers Corp.'s PE ratio is 31.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 7.41x versus 8.31x for Regency Centers Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W.P. Carey, Inc. has a net margin of 28.91% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 32.74%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 12.26% beat W.P. Carey, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.37%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand W.P. Carey, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.53%. Given that CubeSmart has higher upside potential than W.P. Carey, Inc., analysts believe CubeSmart is more attractive than W.P. Carey, Inc..

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.P. Carey, Inc. has a beta of 0.791, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.869%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. W.P. Carey, Inc. offers a yield of 5.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. CubeSmart pays 119.04% of its earnings as a dividend. W.P. Carey, Inc. pays out 167% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $285.1M, which are smaller than W.P. Carey, Inc. quarterly revenues of $431.3M. CubeSmart's net income of $82.4M is lower than W.P. Carey, Inc.'s net income of $141.2M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.99x while W.P. Carey, Inc.'s PE ratio is 38.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 7.41x versus 8.44x for W.P. Carey, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.