CSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Griffon Corp. has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 9.92%. Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 35.41% beat Griffon Corp.'s return on equity of 32.39%.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $394.13, signalling upside risk potential of 1.27%. On the other hand Griffon Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $114.14 which suggests that it could grow by 39%. Given that Griffon Corp. has higher upside potential than Carlisle Cos., Inc., analysts believe Griffon Corp. is more attractive than Carlisle Cos., Inc..

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon Corp. has a beta of 1.322, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.231%.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Griffon Corp. offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Carlisle Cos., Inc. pays 24.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon Corp. pays out 65.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Griffon Corp. quarterly revenues of $649.1M. Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s net income of $139M is higher than Griffon Corp.'s net income of $64.4M. Notably, Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.58x while Griffon Corp.'s PE ratio is 89.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carlisle Cos., Inc. is 3.35x versus 1.49x for Griffon Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graco, Inc. has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 22.34%. Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 35.41% beat Graco, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.34%.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $394.13, signalling upside risk potential of 1.27%. On the other hand Graco, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $96.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.84%. Given that Graco, Inc. has higher upside potential than Carlisle Cos., Inc., analysts believe Graco, Inc. is more attractive than Carlisle Cos., Inc..

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco, Inc. has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.882%.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Graco, Inc. offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Carlisle Cos., Inc. pays 24.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco, Inc. pays out 36.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Graco, Inc. quarterly revenues of $593.2M. Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s net income of $139M is higher than Graco, Inc.'s net income of $132.5M. Notably, Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.58x while Graco, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carlisle Cos., Inc. is 3.35x versus 6.99x for Graco, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International, Inc. has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 11.93%. Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 35.41% beat Lennox International, Inc.'s return on equity of 79.44%.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $394.13, signalling upside risk potential of 1.27%. On the other hand Lennox International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $559.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.21%. Given that Carlisle Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Lennox International, Inc., analysts believe Carlisle Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Lennox International, Inc..

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International, Inc. has a beta of 1.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.663%.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Lennox International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Carlisle Cos., Inc. pays 24.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International, Inc. pays out 22.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Lennox International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s net income of $139M is lower than Lennox International, Inc.'s net income of $142.5M. Notably, Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.58x while Lennox International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carlisle Cos., Inc. is 3.35x versus 3.76x for Lennox International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 4.29%. Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 35.41% beat Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.5%.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $394.13, signalling upside risk potential of 1.27%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.08 which suggests that it could grow by 12.8%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has higher upside potential than Carlisle Cos., Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than Carlisle Cos., Inc..

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.879%.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Carlisle Cos., Inc. pays 24.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays out 124.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s is not.

Carlisle Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s net income of $139M is lower than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $158.2M. Notably, Carlisle Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.58x while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carlisle Cos., Inc. is 3.35x versus 0.82x for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.