CRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Houston American Energy Corp. has a net margin of 58.54% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's net margin of -3115.6%. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's return on equity of 188.75% beat Houston American Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -193.98%.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.32%. On the other hand Houston American Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy Corp., analysts believe Cross Timbers Royalty Trust is more attractive than Houston American Energy Corp..

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.121, which suggesting that the stock is 87.857% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy Corp. has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.645%.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.08%. Houston American Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust pays 100% of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $774.3K, which are larger than Houston American Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $225.7K. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's net income of $453.3K is higher than Houston American Energy Corp.'s net income of -$7M. Notably, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while Houston American Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust is 9.19x versus 55.30x for Houston American Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy Corp. has a net margin of 58.54% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's net margin of 18.65%. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's return on equity of 188.75% beat Mexco Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 9.05%.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.32%. On the other hand Mexco Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy Corp., analysts believe Cross Timbers Royalty Trust is more attractive than Mexco Energy Corp..

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.121, which suggesting that the stock is 87.857% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.331, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.89%.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.08%. Mexco Energy Corp. offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust pays 100% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $774.3K, which are smaller than Mexco Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's net income of $453.3K is higher than Mexco Energy Corp.'s net income of $323.5K. Notably, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while Mexco Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust is 9.19x versus 2.55x for Mexco Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 58.54% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's net margin of -65.69%. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's return on equity of 188.75% beat Ring Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.87%.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.32%. On the other hand Ring Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 165.79%. Given that Ring Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cross Timbers Royalty Trust, analysts believe Ring Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Cross Timbers Royalty Trust.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.121, which suggesting that the stock is 87.857% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.481%.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.08%. Ring Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust pays 100% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $774.3K, which are smaller than Ring Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $78.6M. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's net income of $453.3K is higher than Ring Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$51.6M. Notably, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while Ring Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust is 9.19x versus 0.59x for Ring Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has a net margin of 58.54% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's net margin of 15.29%. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's return on equity of 188.75% beat Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.15%.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.32%. On the other hand Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.47%. Given that Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cross Timbers Royalty Trust, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. is more attractive than Cross Timbers Royalty Trust.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.121, which suggesting that the stock is 87.857% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.163%.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.08%. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. offers a yield of 5.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust pays 100% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. pays out 33.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $774.3K, which are smaller than Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. quarterly revenues of $106.9M. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's net income of $453.3K is lower than Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s net income of $16.3M. Notably, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust is 9.19x versus 1.48x for Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.