Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
61
CMBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.61
Seasonality move
:
0.53%
Day range:
$9.47 - $9.67
52-week range:
$7.65 - $12.00
Dividend yield:
0.53%
P/E ratio:
11.40x
P/S ratio:
1.49x
P/B ratio:
1.08x
Volume:
2.2M
Avg. volume:
2M
1-year change:
-8.86%
Market cap:
$2.7B
Revenue:
$940.2M
EPS (TTM):
$0.83
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMBT
CMB.TECH NV
|
$449.4M | $0.34 | 98.84% | -30.14% | $10.50 |
|
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
|
$117M | $0.40 | -10.56% | 18.76% | $15.32 |
|
EXMRF
EXMAR NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FRO
Frontline Plc
|
$454.6M | $1.13 | 6.81% | 276.78% | $29.38 |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.
|
$162.8M | $0.77 | -13.5% | 82.21% | $34.50 |
|
TK
Teekay Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMBT
CMB.TECH NV
|
$9.46 | $10.50 | $2.7B | 11.40x | $0.05 | 0.53% | 1.49x |
|
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
|
$11.74 | $15.32 | $1.9B | 9.45x | $0.18 | 6.3% | 3.90x |
|
EXMRF
EXMAR NV
|
$11.60 | -- | $922.4M | 4.28x | $0.68 | 2.3% | 2.41x |
|
FRO
Frontline Plc
|
$20.58 | $29.38 | $4.6B | 21.03x | $0.19 | 4.52% | 2.59x |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.
|
$22.08 | $34.50 | $665.2M | 6.95x | $0.50 | 4.98% | 0.86x |
|
TK
Teekay Corp. Ltd.
|
$8.82 | -- | $752.1M | 17.48x | $1.00 | 0% | 0.87x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMBT
CMB.TECH NV
|
68.79% | 0.274 | 206.1% | 0.50x |
|
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
|
19.69% | 0.800 | 13.97% | 1.89x |
|
EXMRF
EXMAR NV
|
-- | 0.506 | -- | -- |
|
FRO
Frontline Plc
|
58.21% | 1.281 | 63.86% | 0.44x |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.
|
50.87% | 0.713 | 284.59% | 1.17x |
|
TK
Teekay Corp. Ltd.
|
5.83% | 0.991 | -- | 4.65x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMBT
CMB.TECH NV
|
$115.6M | $81.5M | 2.26% | 7.15% | 17.95% | -$148.6M |
|
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
|
$34.7M | $30.6M | 14.09% | 18.74% | 28.53% | $22.3M |
|
EXMRF
EXMAR NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | 27.26% | -- |
|
FRO
Frontline Plc
|
$105.3M | $90M | 3.66% | 9.31% | 20.8% | $104.4M |
|
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.
|
$60.8M | $51.6M | 3.54% | 7.09% | 27.68% | $85.6M |
|
TK
Teekay Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | $69.2M | 6.9% | 6.9% | 30.27% | $60.3M |
CMB.TECH NV vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CMBT or DHT?
DHT Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.81% compared to CMB.TECH NV's net margin of 41.82%. CMB.TECH NV's return on equity of 7.15% beat DHT Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMBTCMB.TECH NV25.45% $0.08 $8.2B DHTDHT Holdings, Inc.32.38% $0.28 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CMBT or DHT?
CMB.TECH NV has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.62%. On the other hand DHT Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.32 which suggests that it could grow by 30.49%. Given that DHT Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than CMB.TECH NV, analysts believe DHT Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than CMB.TECH NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMBTCMB.TECH NV1 1 0 DHTDHT Holdings, Inc.4 0 0 -
Is CMBT or DHT More Risky?
CMB.TECH NV has a beta of 0.041, which suggesting that the stock is 95.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DHT Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.069, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.928%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMBT or DHT?
CMB.TECH NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. DHT Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 6.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. CMB.TECH NV pays 23.59% of its earnings as a dividend. DHT Holdings, Inc. pays out 88.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMBT or DHT?
CMB.TECH NV quarterly revenues are $454.2M, which are larger than DHT Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $107.2M. CMB.TECH NV's net income of $17.3M is lower than DHT Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $44.8M. Notably, CMB.TECH NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.40x while DHT Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMB.TECH NV is 1.49x versus 3.90x for DHT Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMBTCMB.TECH NV1.49x 11.40x $454.2M $17.3M DHTDHT Holdings, Inc.3.90x 9.45x $107.2M $44.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CMBT or EXMRF?
EXMAR NV has a net margin of 3.81% compared to CMB.TECH NV's net margin of 17.13%. CMB.TECH NV's return on equity of 7.15% beat EXMAR NV's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMBTCMB.TECH NV25.45% $0.08 $8.2B EXMRFEXMAR NV-- $0.38 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMBT or EXMRF?
CMB.TECH NV has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.62%. On the other hand EXMAR NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CMB.TECH NV has higher upside potential than EXMAR NV, analysts believe CMB.TECH NV is more attractive than EXMAR NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMBTCMB.TECH NV1 1 0 EXMRFEXMAR NV0 0 0 -
Is CMBT or EXMRF More Risky?
CMB.TECH NV has a beta of 0.041, which suggesting that the stock is 95.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EXMAR NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMBT or EXMRF?
CMB.TECH NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. EXMAR NV offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. CMB.TECH NV pays 23.59% of its earnings as a dividend. EXMAR NV pays out -26.59% of its earnings as a dividend. CMB.TECH NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMBT or EXMRF?
CMB.TECH NV quarterly revenues are $454.2M, which are larger than EXMAR NV quarterly revenues of $128.4M. CMB.TECH NV's net income of $17.3M is lower than EXMAR NV's net income of $22M. Notably, CMB.TECH NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.40x while EXMAR NV's PE ratio is 4.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMB.TECH NV is 1.49x versus 2.41x for EXMAR NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMBTCMB.TECH NV1.49x 11.40x $454.2M $17.3M EXMRFEXMAR NV2.41x 4.28x $128.4M $22M
-
Which has Higher Returns CMBT or FRO?
Frontline Plc has a net margin of 3.81% compared to CMB.TECH NV's net margin of 9.32%. CMB.TECH NV's return on equity of 7.15% beat Frontline Plc's return on equity of 9.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMBTCMB.TECH NV25.45% $0.08 $8.2B FROFrontline Plc24.34% $0.18 $5.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CMBT or FRO?
CMB.TECH NV has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.62%. On the other hand Frontline Plc has an analysts' consensus of $29.38 which suggests that it could grow by 42.74%. Given that Frontline Plc has higher upside potential than CMB.TECH NV, analysts believe Frontline Plc is more attractive than CMB.TECH NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMBTCMB.TECH NV1 1 0 FROFrontline Plc3 0 0 -
Is CMBT or FRO More Risky?
CMB.TECH NV has a beta of 0.041, which suggesting that the stock is 95.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frontline Plc has a beta of 0.079, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.141%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMBT or FRO?
CMB.TECH NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Frontline Plc offers a yield of 4.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. CMB.TECH NV pays 23.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Frontline Plc pays out 87.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMBT or FRO?
CMB.TECH NV quarterly revenues are $454.2M, which are larger than Frontline Plc quarterly revenues of $432.7M. CMB.TECH NV's net income of $17.3M is lower than Frontline Plc's net income of $40.3M. Notably, CMB.TECH NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.40x while Frontline Plc's PE ratio is 21.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMB.TECH NV is 1.49x versus 2.59x for Frontline Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMBTCMB.TECH NV1.49x 11.40x $454.2M $17.3M FROFrontline Plc2.59x 21.03x $432.7M $40.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns CMBT or TEN?
Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has a net margin of 3.81% compared to CMB.TECH NV's net margin of 20.7%. CMB.TECH NV's return on equity of 7.15% beat Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMBTCMB.TECH NV25.45% $0.08 $8.2B TENTsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.32.64% $1.05 $3.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CMBT or TEN?
CMB.TECH NV has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.62%. On the other hand Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $34.50 which suggests that it could grow by 57.61%. Given that Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has higher upside potential than CMB.TECH NV, analysts believe Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. is more attractive than CMB.TECH NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMBTCMB.TECH NV1 1 0 TENTsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.2 0 0 -
Is CMBT or TEN More Risky?
CMB.TECH NV has a beta of 0.041, which suggesting that the stock is 95.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. has a beta of -0.209, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.859%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMBT or TEN?
CMB.TECH NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. offers a yield of 4.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CMB.TECH NV pays 23.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. pays out 29.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMBT or TEN?
CMB.TECH NV quarterly revenues are $454.2M, which are larger than Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd. quarterly revenues of $186.2M. CMB.TECH NV's net income of $17.3M is lower than Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.'s net income of $38.5M. Notably, CMB.TECH NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.40x while Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMB.TECH NV is 1.49x versus 0.86x for Tsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMBTCMB.TECH NV1.49x 11.40x $454.2M $17.3M TENTsakos Energy Navigation Ltd.0.86x 6.95x $186.2M $38.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CMBT or TK?
Teekay Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of 3.81% compared to CMB.TECH NV's net margin of 8.03%. CMB.TECH NV's return on equity of 7.15% beat Teekay Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMBTCMB.TECH NV25.45% $0.08 $8.2B TKTeekay Corp. Ltd.-- -- $2B -
What do Analysts Say About CMBT or TK?
CMB.TECH NV has a consensus price target of $10.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.62%. On the other hand Teekay Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -25.26%. Given that CMB.TECH NV has higher upside potential than Teekay Corp. Ltd., analysts believe CMB.TECH NV is more attractive than Teekay Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMBTCMB.TECH NV1 1 0 TKTeekay Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CMBT or TK More Risky?
CMB.TECH NV has a beta of 0.041, which suggesting that the stock is 95.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teekay Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.072, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.762%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMBT or TK?
CMB.TECH NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Teekay Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. CMB.TECH NV pays 23.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Teekay Corp. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CMB.TECH NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMBT or TK?
CMB.TECH NV quarterly revenues are $454.2M, which are larger than Teekay Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $228.5M. CMB.TECH NV's net income of $17.3M is lower than Teekay Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $18.7M. Notably, CMB.TECH NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.40x while Teekay Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMB.TECH NV is 1.49x versus 0.87x for Teekay Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMBTCMB.TECH NV1.49x 11.40x $454.2M $17.3M TKTeekay Corp. Ltd.0.87x 17.48x $228.5M $18.7M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
55
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
BIDU alert for Jan 5
Baidu, Inc. [BIDU] is down 0.42% over the past day.
Buy
69
KORU alert for Jan 5
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 23.79% over the past day.
Buy
62
BE alert for Jan 5
Bloom Energy Corp. [BE] is up 19.51% over the past day.
