CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HP has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 4.18%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat HP's return on equity of --.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $144.10, signalling upside risk potential of 34.61%. On the other hand HP has an analysts' consensus of $36.19 which suggests that it could grow by 17.25%. Given that Celestica has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Celestica is more attractive than HP.

Celestica has a beta of 2.209, which suggesting that the stock is 120.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HP has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.651%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HP offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP pays out 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than HP quarterly revenues of $13.5B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is lower than HP's net income of $565M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.62x while HP's PE ratio is 11.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.32x versus 0.56x for HP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siyata Mobile has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of -10.68%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Siyata Mobile's return on equity of -252.61%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $144.10, signalling upside risk potential of 34.61%. On the other hand Siyata Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45229.13%. Given that Siyata Mobile has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Siyata Mobile is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.209, which suggesting that the stock is 120.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siyata Mobile has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.907%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siyata Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siyata Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Siyata Mobile quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is higher than Siyata Mobile's net income of -$626.3K. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.62x while Siyata Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.32x versus 0.16x for Siyata Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of -105.32%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $144.10, signalling upside risk potential of 34.61%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1184.25%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.209, which suggesting that the stock is 120.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 348.942%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.62x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.32x versus 0.02x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zebra Technologies has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 12.22%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 16%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $144.10, signalling upside risk potential of 34.61%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $391.60 which suggests that it could grow by 24.3%. Given that Celestica has higher upside potential than Zebra Technologies, analysts believe Celestica is more attractive than Zebra Technologies.

Celestica has a beta of 2.209, which suggesting that the stock is 120.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.676, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.586%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is lower than Zebra Technologies's net income of $163M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.62x while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 30.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.32x versus 3.28x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.