Financhill
Buy
65

CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$303.58
Seasonality move :
1%
Day range:
$302.25 - $311.61
52-week range:
$58.05 - $363.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
49.26x
P/S ratio:
3.13x
P/B ratio:
17.21x
Volume:
998.9K
Avg. volume:
3M
1-year change:
208.97%
Market cap:
$34.9B
Revenue:
$9.6B
EPS (TTM):
$6.16

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
$3.6B $1.83 36.99% 35.71% $372.36
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$19.1B $2.01 27.87% 76.41% $456.80
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$4.2B $0.67 24.28% 96.43% $94.54
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
$7.7B $2.49 15.1% 136.13% $259.25
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$18.7B $8.06 132.49% 471.65% $299.76
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$65.6B $1.52 66.71% 70.16% $253.02
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
$303.56 $372.36 $34.9B 49.26x $0.00 0% 3.13x
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$352.13 $456.80 $1.7T 73.96x $0.65 0.69% 26.75x
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$89.57 $94.54 $76.8B 56.80x $0.28 1.25% 5.20x
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
$236.11 $259.25 $25.2B 36.72x $0.08 0.14% 0.83x
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$284.79 $299.76 $320.5B 27.07x $0.12 0.16% 7.60x
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$190.53 $253.02 $4.6T 47.19x $0.01 0.02% 25.03x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
31.25% 5.467 3.25% 0.79x
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
44.98% 1.349 3.81% 1.53x
GLW
Corning, Inc.
44.33% 2.262 13% 0.75x
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
71.48% 2.323 14.96% 0.49x
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
17.52% 3.961 4.69% 1.52x
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
8.34% 2.531 0.22% 3.60x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
$371.3M $215M 25.95% 39.56% 6.73% $89.6M
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$11.8B $7.7B 16.64% 31.98% 42.53% $7.5B
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$1.5B $634M 7.51% 13.07% 15.46% $450M
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
$723M $372M 14.49% 49.49% 4.48% $228M
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$7.7B $6.1B 17.9% 22.98% 45.03% $3B
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$41.8B $36B 99.14% 110.69% 63.17% $22.1B

Celestica, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or AVGO?

    Broadcom Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 47.28%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Broadcom Inc.'s return on equity of 31.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    65.22% $1.74 $147.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or AVGO?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $372.36, signalling upside risk potential of 22.66%. On the other hand Broadcom Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $456.80 which suggests that it could grow by 29.73%. Given that Broadcom Inc. has higher upside potential than Celestica, Inc., analysts believe Broadcom Inc. is more attractive than Celestica, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11 2 0
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    37 2 0
  • Is CLS or AVGO More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.835, which suggesting that the stock is 83.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom Inc. has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.522%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or AVGO?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom Inc. offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom Inc. pays out 49.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or AVGO?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Broadcom Inc. quarterly revenues of $18B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than Broadcom Inc.'s net income of $8.5B. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.26x while Broadcom Inc.'s PE ratio is 73.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.13x versus 26.75x for Broadcom Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.13x 49.26x $3.2B $267.8M
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    26.75x 73.96x $18B $8.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or GLW?

    Corning, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 11.46%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    36.39% $0.50 $21.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or GLW?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $372.36, signalling upside risk potential of 22.66%. On the other hand Corning, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $94.54 which suggests that it could grow by 5.55%. Given that Celestica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe Celestica, Inc. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11 2 0
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 2 1
  • Is CLS or GLW More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.835, which suggesting that the stock is 83.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.424%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or GLW?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Corning, Inc. offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corning, Inc. pays out 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or GLW?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.26x while Corning, Inc.'s PE ratio is 56.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.13x versus 5.20x for Corning, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.13x 49.26x $3.2B $267.8M
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    5.20x 56.80x $4.1B $470M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or JBL?

    Jabil, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 1.76%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Jabil, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    JBL
    Jabil, Inc.
    8.71% $1.35 $4.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or JBL?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $372.36, signalling upside risk potential of 22.66%. On the other hand Jabil, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $259.25 which suggests that it could grow by 9.8%. Given that Celestica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jabil, Inc., analysts believe Celestica, Inc. is more attractive than Jabil, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11 2 0
    JBL
    Jabil, Inc.
    5 2 0
  • Is CLS or JBL More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.835, which suggesting that the stock is 83.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil, Inc. has a beta of 1.263, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.317%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or JBL?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil, Inc. offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc. pays out 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or JBL?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Jabil, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is higher than Jabil, Inc.'s net income of $146M. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.26x while Jabil, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.13x versus 0.83x for Jabil, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.13x 49.26x $3.2B $267.8M
    JBL
    Jabil, Inc.
    0.83x 36.72x $8.3B $146M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or MU?

    Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 38.41%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    56.09% $4.60 $71.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or MU?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $372.36, signalling upside risk potential of 22.66%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $299.76 which suggests that it could grow by 5.26%. Given that Celestica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Micron Technology, Inc., analysts believe Celestica, Inc. is more attractive than Micron Technology, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11 2 0
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    26 4 1
  • Is CLS or MU More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.835, which suggesting that the stock is 83.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.523%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or MU?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or MU?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.6B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $5.2B. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.26x while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.13x versus 7.60x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.13x 49.26x $3.2B $267.8M
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    7.60x 27.07x $13.6B $5.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or NVDA?

    NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    73.41% $1.30 $129.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or NVDA?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $372.36, signalling upside risk potential of 22.66%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $253.02 which suggests that it could grow by 32.8%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than Celestica, Inc., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than Celestica, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11 2 0
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    49 3 1
  • Is CLS or NVDA More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.835, which suggesting that the stock is 83.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.544%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or NVDA?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or NVDA?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.26x while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 47.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.13x versus 25.03x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.13x 49.26x $3.2B $267.8M
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    25.03x 47.19x $57B $31.9B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27

Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.

Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.

Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27

Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock