CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Canadian Solar has a net margin of 5.3% compared to Celestica's net margin of 2.23%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.77% beat Canadian Solar's return on equity of 0.93%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $137.57, signalling upside risk potential of 66.62%. On the other hand Canadian Solar has an analysts' consensus of $14.22 which suggests that it could grow by 98.81%. Given that Canadian Solar has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Canadian Solar is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.094, which suggesting that the stock is 109.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Solar has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.126%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Canadian Solar quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Celestica's net income of $135M is higher than Canadian Solar's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.08x while Canadian Solar's PE ratio is 18.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.02x versus 0.08x for Canadian Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 5.3% compared to Celestica's net margin of 5.65%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.77% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 28.1%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $137.57, signalling upside risk potential of 66.62%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $52.19 which suggests that it could grow by 55.9%. Given that Celestica has higher upside potential than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe Celestica is more attractive than Super Micro Computer.

Celestica has a beta of 2.094, which suggesting that the stock is 109.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.224, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.435%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Celestica's net income of $135M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $320.6M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.08x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 14.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.02x versus 1.02x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 5.3% compared to Celestica's net margin of -105.32%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.77% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $137.57, signalling upside risk potential of 66.62%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1668.87%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.094, which suggesting that the stock is 109.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.920, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 392.029%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Celestica's net income of $135M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.08x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.02x versus 0.11x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zebra Technologies has a net margin of 5.3% compared to Celestica's net margin of 12.22%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.77% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 16%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $137.57, signalling upside risk potential of 66.62%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $349.87 which suggests that it could grow by 53.38%. Given that Celestica has higher upside potential than Zebra Technologies, analysts believe Celestica is more attractive than Zebra Technologies.

Celestica has a beta of 2.094, which suggesting that the stock is 109.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.176%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Celestica's net income of $135M is lower than Zebra Technologies's net income of $163M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.08x while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 22.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.02x versus 2.38x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.