Financhill
Buy
62

CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$295.65
Seasonality move :
0.97%
Day range:
$295.28 - $304.01
52-week range:
$58.05 - $363.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
47.97x
P/S ratio:
3.05x
P/B ratio:
16.76x
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
2.7M
1-year change:
220.27%
Market cap:
$34B
Revenue:
$9.6B
EPS (TTM):
$6.16

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
$3.5B $1.76 36.99% 35.71% $372.36
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$17.5B $1.87 27.87% 76.41% $456.80
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$4.4B $0.70 24.28% 96.43% $94.54
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
$8.1B $2.73 15.1% 136.13% $259.25
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$12.9B $3.96 132.49% 471.65% $299.76
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$55.1B $1.26 66.71% 70.16% $253.02
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
$295.61 $372.36 $34B 47.97x $0.00 0% 3.05x
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$346.10 $456.80 $1.6T 72.70x $0.65 0.7% 26.29x
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$87.56 $94.54 $75.1B 55.53x $0.28 1.28% 5.09x
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
$228.02 $259.25 $24.4B 35.46x $0.08 0.14% 0.80x
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$285.41 $299.76 $321.2B 27.13x $0.12 0.16% 7.62x
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$186.50 $253.02 $4.5T 46.19x $0.01 0.02% 24.50x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
31.25% 6.209 3.25% 0.79x
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
44.98% 2.964 3.81% 1.53x
GLW
Corning, Inc.
44.33% 2.264 13% 0.75x
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
71.48% 2.586 14.96% 0.49x
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
17.52% 3.458 4.69% 1.52x
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
8.34% 2.585 0.22% 3.60x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
$371.3M $215M 25.95% 39.56% 6.73% $89.6M
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$11.8B $7.7B 16.64% 31.98% 42.53% $7.5B
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$1.5B $634M 7.51% 13.07% 15.46% $450M
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
$723M $372M 14.49% 49.49% 4.48% $228M
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$7.7B $6.1B 17.9% 22.98% 45.03% $3B
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$41.8B $36B 99.14% 110.69% 63.17% $22.1B

Celestica, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or AVGO?

    Broadcom Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 47.28%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Broadcom Inc.'s return on equity of 31.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    65.22% $1.74 $147.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or AVGO?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $372.36, signalling upside risk potential of 25.96%. On the other hand Broadcom Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $456.80 which suggests that it could grow by 31.99%. Given that Broadcom Inc. has higher upside potential than Celestica, Inc., analysts believe Broadcom Inc. is more attractive than Celestica, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11 2 0
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    37 2 0
  • Is CLS or AVGO More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, which suggesting that the stock is 86.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom Inc. has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.768%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or AVGO?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom Inc. offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom Inc. pays out 49.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or AVGO?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Broadcom Inc. quarterly revenues of $18B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than Broadcom Inc.'s net income of $8.5B. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.97x while Broadcom Inc.'s PE ratio is 72.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.05x versus 26.29x for Broadcom Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.05x 47.97x $3.2B $267.8M
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    26.29x 72.70x $18B $8.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or GLW?

    Corning, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 11.46%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    36.39% $0.50 $21.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or GLW?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $372.36, signalling upside risk potential of 25.96%. On the other hand Corning, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $94.54 which suggests that it could grow by 7.97%. Given that Celestica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe Celestica, Inc. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11 2 0
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 2 1
  • Is CLS or GLW More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, which suggesting that the stock is 86.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.065%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or GLW?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Corning, Inc. offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corning, Inc. pays out 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or GLW?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.97x while Corning, Inc.'s PE ratio is 55.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.05x versus 5.09x for Corning, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.05x 47.97x $3.2B $267.8M
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    5.09x 55.53x $4.1B $470M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or JBL?

    Jabil, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 1.76%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Jabil, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    JBL
    Jabil, Inc.
    8.71% $1.35 $4.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or JBL?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $372.36, signalling upside risk potential of 25.96%. On the other hand Jabil, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $259.25 which suggests that it could grow by 13.7%. Given that Celestica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jabil, Inc., analysts believe Celestica, Inc. is more attractive than Jabil, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11 2 0
    JBL
    Jabil, Inc.
    5 2 0
  • Is CLS or JBL More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, which suggesting that the stock is 86.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil, Inc. has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.557%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or JBL?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil, Inc. offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc. pays out 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or JBL?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Jabil, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is higher than Jabil, Inc.'s net income of $146M. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.97x while Jabil, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.05x versus 0.80x for Jabil, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.05x 47.97x $3.2B $267.8M
    JBL
    Jabil, Inc.
    0.80x 35.46x $8.3B $146M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or MU?

    Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 38.41%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    56.09% $4.60 $71.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or MU?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $372.36, signalling upside risk potential of 25.96%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $299.76 which suggests that it could grow by 5.03%. Given that Celestica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Micron Technology, Inc., analysts believe Celestica, Inc. is more attractive than Micron Technology, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11 2 0
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    26 4 1
  • Is CLS or MU More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, which suggesting that the stock is 86.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.087%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or MU?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or MU?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.6B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $5.2B. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.97x while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.05x versus 7.62x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.05x 47.97x $3.2B $267.8M
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    7.62x 27.13x $13.6B $5.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or NVDA?

    NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    73.41% $1.30 $129.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or NVDA?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $372.36, signalling upside risk potential of 25.96%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $253.02 which suggests that it could grow by 35.67%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than Celestica, Inc., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than Celestica, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11 2 0
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    49 3 1
  • Is CLS or NVDA More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, which suggesting that the stock is 86.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.494%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or NVDA?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or NVDA?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.97x while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 46.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.05x versus 24.50x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.05x 47.97x $3.2B $267.8M
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    24.50x 46.19x $57B $31.9B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?

In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…

Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?

AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?

In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 1

Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.

Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 1

Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is up 22.82% over the past day.

Buy
81
ZIJMY alert for Jan 1

Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. [ZIJMY] is up 1.86% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock