Financhill
Buy
71

CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$300.00
Seasonality move :
-1.5%
Day range:
$330.10 - $352.20
52-week range:
$58.05 - $363.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
56.03x
P/S ratio:
3.57x
P/B ratio:
19.58x
Volume:
5.3M
Avg. volume:
2.5M
1-year change:
265.4%
Market cap:
$39.7B
Revenue:
$9.6B
EPS (TTM):
$6.16

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
$3.5B $1.76 36.73% 148.7% $378.20
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$2.4B $0.76 22.69% 18.76% $164.87
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$17.5B $1.87 28.03% 77.4% $456.12
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
$8.1B $2.73 15.14% 136.53% $264.50
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$55.1B $1.26 66.66% 70.31% $253.19
SANM
Sanmina Corp.
$3.1B $2.15 65.38% 107.06% $197.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
$345.23 $378.20 $39.7B 56.03x $0.00 0% 3.57x
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$150.15 $164.87 $189.1B 57.14x $0.00 0% 22.71x
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$333.24 $456.12 $1.6T 70.00x $0.65 0.73% 25.31x
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
$243.62 $264.50 $25.7B 37.90x $0.08 0.13% 0.86x
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$191.52 $253.19 $4.7T 47.44x $0.01 0.02% 25.16x
SANM
Sanmina Corp.
$152.65 $197.50 $8.3B 36.52x $0.00 0% 0.90x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
31.25% 6.209 3.25% 0.79x
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
-- 2.899 -- 2.48x
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
44.98% 2.964 3.81% 1.53x
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
71.48% 2.586 14.96% 0.49x
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
8.34% 2.585 0.22% 3.60x
SANM
Sanmina Corp.
48.81% 1.740 28.29% 0.98x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CLS
Celestica, Inc.
$371.3M $215M 25.95% 39.56% 6.73% $89.6M
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$1.5B $978.2M 32.13% 32.17% 42.38% $1.2B
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$11.8B $7.7B 16.64% 31.98% 42.53% $7.5B
JBL
Jabil, Inc.
$723M $372M 14.49% 49.49% 4.48% $228M
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$41.8B $36B 99.14% 110.69% 63.17% $22.1B
SANM
Sanmina Corp.
$241.2M $117.6M 7.58% 9.89% 3.69% $91.9M

Celestica, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or ANET?

    Arista Networks, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 36.95%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Arista Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.17%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    ANET
    Arista Networks, Inc.
    64.56% $0.67 $11.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or ANET?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $378.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.55%. On the other hand Arista Networks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $164.87 which suggests that it could grow by 9.81%. Given that Arista Networks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Celestica, Inc., analysts believe Arista Networks, Inc. is more attractive than Celestica, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    12 2 0
    ANET
    Arista Networks, Inc.
    18 4 0
  • Is CLS or ANET More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, which suggesting that the stock is 86.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arista Networks, Inc. has a beta of 1.413, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.342%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or ANET?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Arista Networks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arista Networks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or ANET?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Arista Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than Arista Networks, Inc.'s net income of $853M. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.03x while Arista Networks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 57.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.57x versus 22.71x for Arista Networks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.57x 56.03x $3.2B $267.8M
    ANET
    Arista Networks, Inc.
    22.71x 57.14x $2.3B $853M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or AVGO?

    Broadcom Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 47.28%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Broadcom Inc.'s return on equity of 31.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    65.22% $1.74 $147.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or AVGO?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $378.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.55%. On the other hand Broadcom Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $456.12 which suggests that it could grow by 36.88%. Given that Broadcom Inc. has higher upside potential than Celestica, Inc., analysts believe Broadcom Inc. is more attractive than Celestica, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    12 2 0
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    39 2 0
  • Is CLS or AVGO More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, which suggesting that the stock is 86.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom Inc. has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.768%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or AVGO?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom Inc. offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom Inc. pays out 49.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or AVGO?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Broadcom Inc. quarterly revenues of $18B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than Broadcom Inc.'s net income of $8.5B. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.03x while Broadcom Inc.'s PE ratio is 70.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.57x versus 25.31x for Broadcom Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.57x 56.03x $3.2B $267.8M
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    25.31x 70.00x $18B $8.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or JBL?

    Jabil, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 1.76%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Jabil, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    JBL
    Jabil, Inc.
    8.71% $1.35 $4.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or JBL?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $378.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.55%. On the other hand Jabil, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $264.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.57%. Given that Celestica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jabil, Inc., analysts believe Celestica, Inc. is more attractive than Jabil, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    12 2 0
    JBL
    Jabil, Inc.
    5 2 0
  • Is CLS or JBL More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, which suggesting that the stock is 86.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil, Inc. has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.557%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or JBL?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil, Inc. offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc. pays out 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or JBL?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Jabil, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is higher than Jabil, Inc.'s net income of $146M. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.03x while Jabil, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.57x versus 0.86x for Jabil, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.57x 56.03x $3.2B $267.8M
    JBL
    Jabil, Inc.
    0.86x 37.90x $8.3B $146M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or NVDA?

    NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    73.41% $1.30 $129.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or NVDA?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $378.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.55%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $253.19 which suggests that it could grow by 32.2%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than Celestica, Inc., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than Celestica, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    12 2 0
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    48 3 1
  • Is CLS or NVDA More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, which suggesting that the stock is 86.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.494%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or NVDA?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or NVDA?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.03x while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 47.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.57x versus 25.16x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.57x 56.03x $3.2B $267.8M
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    25.16x 47.44x $57B $31.9B
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or SANM?

    Sanmina Corp. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Celestica, Inc.'s net margin of 1.62%. Celestica, Inc.'s return on equity of 39.56% beat Sanmina Corp.'s return on equity of 9.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    11.63% $2.31 $3B
    SANM
    Sanmina Corp.
    7.56% $0.89 $5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or SANM?

    Celestica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $378.20, signalling upside risk potential of 9.55%. On the other hand Sanmina Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $197.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.38%. Given that Sanmina Corp. has higher upside potential than Celestica, Inc., analysts believe Sanmina Corp. is more attractive than Celestica, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    12 2 0
    SANM
    Sanmina Corp.
    1 1 0
  • Is CLS or SANM More Risky?

    Celestica, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, which suggesting that the stock is 86.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sanmina Corp. has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.654%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or SANM?

    Celestica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sanmina Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sanmina Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or SANM?

    Celestica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Sanmina Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Celestica, Inc.'s net income of $267.8M is higher than Sanmina Corp.'s net income of $51.8M. Notably, Celestica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.03x while Sanmina Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica, Inc. is 3.57x versus 0.90x for Sanmina Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica, Inc.
    3.57x 56.03x $3.2B $267.8M
    SANM
    Sanmina Corp.
    0.90x 36.52x $3.2B $51.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?

Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…

Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?

Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…

Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?

UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.7T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Sell
48
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Alerts

Buy
72
BNAI alert for Jan 29

Brand Engagement Network, Inc. [BNAI] is down 16.89% over the past day.

Buy
82
STX alert for Jan 29

Seagate Technology Holdings Plc [STX] is up 0.83% over the past day.

Buy
84
GDXU alert for Jan 29

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 12.19% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock