CGV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Conductor Global Equity Value ETF's net margin of --. Conductor Global Equity Value ETF's return on equity of -- beat Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF's return on equity of --.

Conductor Global Equity Value ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Conductor Global Equity Value ETF has higher upside potential than Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF, analysts believe Conductor Global Equity Value ETF is more attractive than Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF.

Conductor Global Equity Value ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.99%.

Conductor Global Equity Value ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Conductor Global Equity Value ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Conductor Global Equity Value ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Conductor Global Equity Value ETF's net income of -- is lower than Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Conductor Global Equity Value ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conductor Global Equity Value ETF is -- versus -- for Schwab Fundamental Intl Small Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Conductor Global Equity Value ETF's net margin of --. Conductor Global Equity Value ETF's return on equity of -- beat Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF's return on equity of --.

Conductor Global Equity Value ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Conductor Global Equity Value ETF has higher upside potential than Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF, analysts believe Conductor Global Equity Value ETF is more attractive than Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF.

Conductor Global Equity Value ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.275%.

Conductor Global Equity Value ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF offers a yield of 5.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Conductor Global Equity Value ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Conductor Global Equity Value ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF quarterly revenues of --. Conductor Global Equity Value ETF's net income of -- is lower than Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF's net income of --. Notably, Conductor Global Equity Value ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conductor Global Equity Value ETF is -- versus -- for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.