CBL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Getty Realty has a net margin of 28.84% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 42.05%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 18.96% beat Getty Realty's return on equity of 7.43%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.93%. On the other hand Getty Realty has an analysts' consensus of $33.43 which suggests that it could grow by 19.05%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Getty Realty, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Getty Realty.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Getty Realty has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.153%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.11%. Getty Realty offers a yield of 6.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Getty Realty pays out 141.01% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Getty Realty's is not.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are larger than Getty Realty quarterly revenues of $53M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $38M is higher than Getty Realty's net income of $22.3M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.04x while Getty Realty's PE ratio is 22.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.35x versus 7.53x for Getty Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 28.84% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 31.6%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 18.96% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity of 3.87%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.93%. On the other hand Kimco Realty has an analysts' consensus of $24.60 which suggests that it could grow by 22.18%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Kimco Realty, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Kimco Realty.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.919%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.11%. Kimco Realty offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimco Realty pays out 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimco Realty's is not.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are smaller than Kimco Realty quarterly revenues of $525.4M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $38M is lower than Kimco Realty's net income of $166M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.04x while Kimco Realty's PE ratio is 35.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.35x versus 6.64x for Kimco Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 28.84% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 4.81%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 18.96% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.93%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 29.63%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Strawberry Fields REIT, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Strawberry Fields REIT.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.11%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $38M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.04x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 18.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.35x versus 0.65x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veris Residential has a net margin of 28.84% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of -18.28%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 18.96% beat Veris Residential's return on equity of -1.82%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.93%. On the other hand Veris Residential has an analysts' consensus of $19.79 which suggests that it could grow by 31.42%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Veris Residential, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Veris Residential.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veris Residential has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.04%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.11%. Veris Residential offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Veris Residential pays out -104.03% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $131.7M, which are larger than Veris Residential quarterly revenues of $68.1M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $38M is higher than Veris Residential's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.04x while Veris Residential's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.35x versus 5.64x for Veris Residential. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.