Financhill
Sell
33

AWF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$10.73
Seasonality move :
3.37%
Day range:
$10.72 - $10.79
52-week range:
$9.30 - $11.43
Dividend yield:
7.33%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
243.7K
Avg. volume:
270.5K
1-year change:
-2.37%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AWF
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
-- -- -- -- --
DHF
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
-- -- -- -- --
DSL
Doubleline Income Solutions Fund
-- -- -- -- --
ISD
PGIM High Yield Bond Fund
-- -- -- -- --
NHS
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
-- -- -- -- --
VLT
Invesco High Income Trust II
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AWF
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
$10.72 -- -- -- $0.07 7.33% --
DHF
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
$2.52 -- -- -- $0.02 8.33% --
DSL
Doubleline Income Solutions Fund
$11.30 -- -- -- $0.11 11.68% --
ISD
PGIM High Yield Bond Fund
$14.59 -- -- -- $0.11 8.64% --
NHS
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
$7.25 -- -- -- $0.09 14.98% --
VLT
Invesco High Income Trust II
$11.14 -- -- -- $0.09 10.32% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AWF
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
-- 0.689 -- --
DHF
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
-- 0.803 -- --
DSL
Doubleline Income Solutions Fund
-- 0.382 -- --
ISD
PGIM High Yield Bond Fund
-- 1.052 -- --
NHS
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
-- 1.801 -- --
VLT
Invesco High Income Trust II
-- 0.969 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AWF
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
DHF
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
DSL
Doubleline Income Solutions Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
ISD
PGIM High Yield Bond Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
NHS
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
VLT
Invesco High Income Trust II
-- -- -- -- -- --

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AWF or DHF?

    BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund has a net margin of -- compared to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net margin of --. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    -- -- --
    DHF
    BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AWF or DHF?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has higher upside potential than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund, analysts believe AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is more attractive than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    0 0 0
    DHF
    BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is AWF or DHF More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund has a beta of 1.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.796%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWF or DHF?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.33%. BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund offers a yield of 8.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AWF or DHF?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund quarterly revenues of --. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's net income of --. Notably, AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is -- versus -- for BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    -- -- -- --
    DHF
    BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AWF or DSL?

    Doubleline Income Solutions Fund has a net margin of -- compared to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net margin of --. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Doubleline Income Solutions Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    -- -- --
    DSL
    Doubleline Income Solutions Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AWF or DSL?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Doubleline Income Solutions Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has higher upside potential than Doubleline Income Solutions Fund, analysts believe AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is more attractive than Doubleline Income Solutions Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    0 0 0
    DSL
    Doubleline Income Solutions Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is AWF or DSL More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Doubleline Income Solutions Fund has a beta of 1.367, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.717%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWF or DSL?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.33%. Doubleline Income Solutions Fund offers a yield of 11.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Doubleline Income Solutions Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AWF or DSL?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Doubleline Income Solutions Fund quarterly revenues of --. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Doubleline Income Solutions Fund's net income of --. Notably, AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Doubleline Income Solutions Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is -- versus -- for Doubleline Income Solutions Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    -- -- -- --
    DSL
    Doubleline Income Solutions Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AWF or ISD?

    PGIM High Yield Bond Fund has a net margin of -- compared to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net margin of --. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat PGIM High Yield Bond Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    -- -- --
    ISD
    PGIM High Yield Bond Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AWF or ISD?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PGIM High Yield Bond Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has higher upside potential than PGIM High Yield Bond Fund, analysts believe AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is more attractive than PGIM High Yield Bond Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    0 0 0
    ISD
    PGIM High Yield Bond Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is AWF or ISD More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PGIM High Yield Bond Fund has a beta of 1.327, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.663%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWF or ISD?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.33%. PGIM High Yield Bond Fund offers a yield of 8.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PGIM High Yield Bond Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AWF or ISD?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PGIM High Yield Bond Fund quarterly revenues of --. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than PGIM High Yield Bond Fund's net income of --. Notably, AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PGIM High Yield Bond Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is -- versus -- for PGIM High Yield Bond Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    -- -- -- --
    ISD
    PGIM High Yield Bond Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AWF or NHS?

    Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund has a net margin of -- compared to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net margin of --. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    -- -- --
    NHS
    Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AWF or NHS?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has higher upside potential than Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund, analysts believe AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is more attractive than Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    0 0 0
    NHS
    Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is AWF or NHS More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund has a beta of 1.746, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.596%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWF or NHS?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.33%. Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund offers a yield of 14.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AWF or NHS?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund quarterly revenues of --. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund's net income of --. Notably, AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is -- versus -- for Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    -- -- -- --
    NHS
    Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AWF or VLT?

    Invesco High Income Trust II has a net margin of -- compared to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net margin of --. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Invesco High Income Trust II's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    -- -- --
    VLT
    Invesco High Income Trust II
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AWF or VLT?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco High Income Trust II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has higher upside potential than Invesco High Income Trust II, analysts believe AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is more attractive than Invesco High Income Trust II.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    0 0 0
    VLT
    Invesco High Income Trust II
    0 0 0
  • Is AWF or VLT More Risky?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco High Income Trust II has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.465%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWF or VLT?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.33%. Invesco High Income Trust II offers a yield of 10.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco High Income Trust II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AWF or VLT?

    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco High Income Trust II quarterly revenues of --. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Invesco High Income Trust II's net income of --. Notably, AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco High Income Trust II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund is -- versus -- for Invesco High Income Trust II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AWF
    AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
    -- -- -- --
    VLT
    Invesco High Income Trust II
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?

Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…

Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?

Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.

Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6

Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.

Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6

Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock