ASX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has a net margin of 6.04% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of --. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 11.28% beat ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's return on equity of 7.23%.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.91%. On the other hand ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ASE Technology Holding has higher upside potential than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES, analysts believe ASE Technology Holding is more attractive than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.178% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has a beta of 0.858, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.22%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES offers a yield of 5.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 106.72% of its earnings as a dividend. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES pays out 85.01% of its earnings as a dividend. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but ASE Technology Holding's is not.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES quarterly revenues of --. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $299.6M is higher than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's net income of --. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.66x while ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's PE ratio is 12.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 1.22x versus 1.03x for ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Infosys has a net margin of 6.04% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of 15.88%. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 11.28% beat Infosys's return on equity of 31.76%.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.91%. On the other hand Infosys has an analysts' consensus of $23.41 which suggests that it could grow by 2.75%. Given that ASE Technology Holding has higher upside potential than Infosys, analysts believe ASE Technology Holding is more attractive than Infosys.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.178% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Infosys has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.47999999999999%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Infosys offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 106.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Infosys pays out 56.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Infosys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but ASE Technology Holding's is not.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Infosys quarterly revenues of $4.9B. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $299.6M is lower than Infosys's net income of $777M. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.66x while Infosys's PE ratio is 29.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 1.22x versus 4.98x for Infosys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SemiLEDs has a net margin of 6.04% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of -24.11%. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 11.28% beat SemiLEDs's return on equity of -119.88%.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.91%. On the other hand SemiLEDs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ASE Technology Holding has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe ASE Technology Holding is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.178% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SemiLEDs has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.386%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. SemiLEDs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 106.72% of its earnings as a dividend. SemiLEDs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than SemiLEDs quarterly revenues of $1.3M. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $299.6M is higher than SemiLEDs's net income of -$319K. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.66x while SemiLEDs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 1.22x versus 1.42x for SemiLEDs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Semilux International has a net margin of 6.04% compared to ASE Technology Holding's net margin of --. ASE Technology Holding's return on equity of 11.28% beat Semilux International's return on equity of --.

ASE Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.91%. On the other hand Semilux International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ASE Technology Holding has higher upside potential than Semilux International, analysts believe ASE Technology Holding is more attractive than Semilux International.

ASE Technology Holding has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.178% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Semilux International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ASE Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Semilux International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASE Technology Holding pays 106.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Semilux International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ASE Technology Holding quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Semilux International quarterly revenues of --. ASE Technology Holding's net income of $299.6M is higher than Semilux International's net income of --. Notably, ASE Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.66x while Semilux International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASE Technology Holding is 1.22x versus -- for Semilux International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.