TRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amtech Systems has a net margin of -2.41% compared to Trio-Tech International's net margin of -2.22%. Trio-Tech International's return on equity of 1.85% beat Amtech Systems's return on equity of -10.28%.

Trio-Tech International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amtech Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Amtech Systems has higher upside potential than Trio-Tech International, analysts believe Amtech Systems is more attractive than Trio-Tech International.

Trio-Tech International has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.92% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amtech Systems has a beta of 1.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.728%.

Trio-Tech International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amtech Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trio-Tech International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amtech Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trio-Tech International quarterly revenues are $9.8M, which are smaller than Amtech Systems quarterly revenues of $24.1M. Trio-Tech International's net income of -$236K is higher than Amtech Systems's net income of -$536K. Notably, Trio-Tech International's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.62x while Amtech Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trio-Tech International is 0.63x versus 0.78x for Amtech Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Indie Semiconductor has a net margin of -2.41% compared to Trio-Tech International's net margin of -92.06%. Trio-Tech International's return on equity of 1.85% beat Indie Semiconductor's return on equity of -24.47%.

Trio-Tech International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Indie Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $8.14 which suggests that it could grow by 98.61%. Given that Indie Semiconductor has higher upside potential than Trio-Tech International, analysts believe Indie Semiconductor is more attractive than Trio-Tech International.

Trio-Tech International has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.92% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Indie Semiconductor has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.761%.

Trio-Tech International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Indie Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trio-Tech International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Indie Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trio-Tech International quarterly revenues are $9.8M, which are smaller than Indie Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $54M. Trio-Tech International's net income of -$236K is higher than Indie Semiconductor's net income of -$49.7M. Notably, Trio-Tech International's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.62x while Indie Semiconductor's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trio-Tech International is 0.63x versus 3.02x for Indie Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lam Research has a net margin of -2.41% compared to Trio-Tech International's net margin of 26.79%. Trio-Tech International's return on equity of 1.85% beat Lam Research's return on equity of 49.11%.

Trio-Tech International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lam Research has an analysts' consensus of $92.82 which suggests that it could grow by 29.29%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than Trio-Tech International, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than Trio-Tech International.

Trio-Tech International has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.92% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lam Research has a beta of 1.463, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.279%.

Trio-Tech International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lam Research offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Trio-Tech International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research pays out 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trio-Tech International quarterly revenues are $9.8M, which are smaller than Lam Research quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Trio-Tech International's net income of -$236K is lower than Lam Research's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Trio-Tech International's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.62x while Lam Research's PE ratio is 23.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trio-Tech International is 0.63x versus 6.05x for Lam Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veeco Instruments has a net margin of -2.41% compared to Trio-Tech International's net margin of 11.88%. Trio-Tech International's return on equity of 1.85% beat Veeco Instruments's return on equity of 11.6%.

Trio-Tech International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Veeco Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $42.86 which suggests that it could grow by 30.4%. Given that Veeco Instruments has higher upside potential than Trio-Tech International, analysts believe Veeco Instruments is more attractive than Trio-Tech International.

Trio-Tech International has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.92% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veeco Instruments has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.774%.

Trio-Tech International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veeco Instruments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trio-Tech International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veeco Instruments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trio-Tech International quarterly revenues are $9.8M, which are smaller than Veeco Instruments quarterly revenues of $184.8M. Trio-Tech International's net income of -$236K is lower than Veeco Instruments's net income of $22M. Notably, Trio-Tech International's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.62x while Veeco Instruments's PE ratio is 19.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trio-Tech International is 0.63x versus 2.29x for Veeco Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.