Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
24
FCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.00
Seasonality move
:
-1.72%
Day range:
$3.00 - $3.23
52-week range:
$2.73 - $6.77
Dividend yield:
27.63%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
393.7K
Avg. volume:
176.8K
1-year change:
-49.33%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FCO
abrdn Global Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BWG
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDO
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FCO
abrdn Global Income Fund
|
$3.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 27.63% | -- |
|
BWG
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund
|
$8.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 11.59% | -- |
|
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund
|
$16.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 12.34% | -- |
|
GDO
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund
|
$11.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 12.95% | -- |
|
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
|
$24.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 4.22% | -- |
|
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.
|
$8.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 8.7% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FCO
abrdn Global Income Fund
|
-- | -5.841 | -- | -- |
|
BWG
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund
|
-- | 0.143 | -- | -- |
|
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund
|
-- | 0.242 | -- | -- |
|
GDO
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund
|
-- | 0.580 | -- | -- |
|
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.537 | -- | -- |
|
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.
|
-- | 1.240 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FCO
abrdn Global Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BWG
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDO
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
abrdn Global Income Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FCO or BWG?
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Global Income Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- BWGBrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FCO or BWG?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Global Income Fund has higher upside potential than BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund, analysts believe abrdn Global Income Fund is more attractive than BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FCOabrdn Global Income Fund0 0 0 BWGBrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund0 0 0 -
Is FCO or BWG More Risky?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund has a beta of 1.758, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.771%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FCO or BWG?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 27.63%. BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund offers a yield of 11.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. abrdn Global Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FCO or BWG?
abrdn Global Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Global Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Global Income Fund is -- versus -- for BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- -- BWGBrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FCO or FAX?
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Global Income Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- FAXabrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FCO or FAX?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Global Income Fund has higher upside potential than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund, analysts believe abrdn Global Income Fund is more attractive than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FCOabrdn Global Income Fund0 0 0 FAXabrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is FCO or FAX More Risky?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund has a beta of 1.749, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.883%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FCO or FAX?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 27.63%. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund offers a yield of 12.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. abrdn Global Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FCO or FAX?
abrdn Global Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Global Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Global Income Fund is -- versus -- for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- -- FAXabrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FCO or GDO?
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Global Income Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- GDOWestern Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FCO or GDO?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Global Income Fund has higher upside potential than Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund, analysts believe abrdn Global Income Fund is more attractive than Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FCOabrdn Global Income Fund0 0 0 GDOWestern Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund0 0 0 -
Is FCO or GDO More Risky?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund has a beta of 1.812, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.187%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FCO or GDO?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 27.63%. Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund offers a yield of 12.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. abrdn Global Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FCO or GDO?
abrdn Global Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Global Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Global Income Fund is -- versus -- for Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- -- GDOWestern Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FCO or GRNB?
VanEck Green Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Global Income Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Green Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- GRNBVanEck Green Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FCO or GRNB?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Green Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Global Income Fund has higher upside potential than VanEck Green Bond ETF, analysts believe abrdn Global Income Fund is more attractive than VanEck Green Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FCOabrdn Global Income Fund0 0 0 GRNBVanEck Green Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is FCO or GRNB More Risky?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Green Bond ETF has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.07%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FCO or GRNB?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 27.63%. VanEck Green Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. abrdn Global Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Green Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FCO or GRNB?
abrdn Global Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Green Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Green Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Global Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Green Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Global Income Fund is -- versus -- for VanEck Green Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- -- GRNBVanEck Green Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FCO or SABA?
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Global Income Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- SABASaba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FCO or SABA?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Global Income Fund has higher upside potential than Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II., analysts believe abrdn Global Income Fund is more attractive than Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FCOabrdn Global Income Fund0 0 0 SABASaba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.0 0 0 -
Is FCO or SABA More Risky?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. has a beta of 0.809, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.102%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FCO or SABA?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 27.63%. Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. offers a yield of 8.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. abrdn Global Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FCO or SABA?
abrdn Global Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.'s net income of --. Notably, abrdn Global Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Global Income Fund is -- versus -- for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- -- SABASaba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
50
AXTI alert for Mar 3
AXT, Inc. [AXTI] is down 9.65% over the past day.
Buy
53
AAOI alert for Mar 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is down 6.93% over the past day.
Sell
32
TPB alert for Mar 3
Turning Point Brands, Inc. [TPB] is down 0.87% over the past day.
