Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
32
FCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.89
Seasonality move
:
1.15%
Day range:
$2.85 - $2.90
52-week range:
$2.73 - $6.77
Dividend yield:
28.97%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
120.1K
Avg. volume:
106.6K
1-year change:
-50.17%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FCO
abrdn Global Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BWG
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDO
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPSK
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FCO
abrdn Global Income Fund
|
$2.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 28.97% | -- |
|
BWG
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund
|
$8.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 11.44% | -- |
|
GDO
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund
|
$11.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 12.35% | -- |
|
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
|
$24.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 4.15% | -- |
|
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.
|
$8.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 8.07% | -- |
|
SPSK
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF
|
$18.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 3.4% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FCO
abrdn Global Income Fund
|
-- | -3.266 | -- | -- |
|
BWG
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund
|
-- | 1.796 | -- | -- |
|
GDO
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund
|
-- | 1.138 | -- | -- |
|
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.702 | -- | -- |
|
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.
|
-- | -0.274 | -- | -- |
|
SPSK
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF
|
-- | 0.261 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FCO
abrdn Global Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BWG
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDO
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPSK
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
abrdn Global Income Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FCO or BWG?
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Global Income Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- BWGBrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FCO or BWG?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Global Income Fund has higher upside potential than BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund, analysts believe abrdn Global Income Fund is more attractive than BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FCOabrdn Global Income Fund0 0 0 BWGBrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund0 0 0 -
Is FCO or BWG More Risky?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund has a beta of 1.784, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.375%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FCO or BWG?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 28.97%. BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund offers a yield of 11.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. abrdn Global Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FCO or BWG?
abrdn Global Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Global Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Global Income Fund is -- versus -- for BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- -- BWGBrandywineGLOBAL - Global Income Opportunities Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FCO or GDO?
Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Global Income Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- GDOWestern Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FCO or GDO?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Global Income Fund has higher upside potential than Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund, analysts believe abrdn Global Income Fund is more attractive than Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FCOabrdn Global Income Fund0 0 0 GDOWestern Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund0 0 0 -
Is FCO or GDO More Risky?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.183%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FCO or GDO?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 28.97%. Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund offers a yield of 12.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. abrdn Global Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FCO or GDO?
abrdn Global Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Global Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Global Income Fund is -- versus -- for Western Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- -- GDOWestern Asset Global Corporate Defined Opportunity Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FCO or GRNB?
VanEck Green Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Global Income Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Green Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- GRNBVanEck Green Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FCO or GRNB?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Green Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Global Income Fund has higher upside potential than VanEck Green Bond ETF, analysts believe abrdn Global Income Fund is more attractive than VanEck Green Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FCOabrdn Global Income Fund0 0 0 GRNBVanEck Green Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is FCO or GRNB More Risky?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Green Bond ETF has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.488%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FCO or GRNB?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 28.97%. VanEck Green Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. abrdn Global Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Green Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FCO or GRNB?
abrdn Global Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Green Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Green Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Global Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Green Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Global Income Fund is -- versus -- for VanEck Green Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- -- GRNBVanEck Green Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FCO or SABA?
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Global Income Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- SABASaba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FCO or SABA?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Global Income Fund has higher upside potential than Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II., analysts believe abrdn Global Income Fund is more attractive than Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FCOabrdn Global Income Fund0 0 0 SABASaba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.0 0 0 -
Is FCO or SABA More Risky?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.805%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FCO or SABA?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 28.97%. Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. offers a yield of 8.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. abrdn Global Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FCO or SABA?
abrdn Global Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II. quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.'s net income of --. Notably, abrdn Global Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Global Income Fund is -- versus -- for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- -- SABASaba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FCO or SPSK?
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Global Income Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- SPSKSP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FCO or SPSK?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Global Income Fund has higher upside potential than SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF, analysts believe abrdn Global Income Fund is more attractive than SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FCOabrdn Global Income Fund0 0 0 SPSKSP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF0 0 0 -
Is FCO or SPSK More Risky?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.527%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FCO or SPSK?
abrdn Global Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 28.97%. SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. abrdn Global Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FCO or SPSK?
abrdn Global Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Global Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Global Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Global Income Fund is -- versus -- for SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FCOabrdn Global Income Fund-- -- -- -- SPSKSP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 21.85% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is down 19.73% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is down 14.21% over the past day.
