XP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I has a net margin of 61.12% compared to XP's net margin of --. XP's return on equity of 21.58% beat Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I's return on equity of --.

XP has a consensus price target of $21.78, signalling upside risk potential of 78.69%. On the other hand Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that XP has higher upside potential than Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I, analysts believe XP is more attractive than Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I.

XP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

XP has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. XP pays 90.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. XP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

XP quarterly revenues are $349.7M, which are larger than Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I quarterly revenues of --. XP's net income of $213.7M is higher than Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I's net income of $33.4M. Notably, XP's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.94x while Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I's PE ratio is 5.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XP is 4.70x versus -- for Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nu Holdings has a net margin of 61.12% compared to XP's net margin of 26.4%. XP's return on equity of 21.58% beat Nu Holdings's return on equity of 26.44%.

XP has a consensus price target of $21.78, signalling upside risk potential of 78.69%. On the other hand Nu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.54 which suggests that it could grow by 49.66%. Given that XP has higher upside potential than Nu Holdings, analysts believe XP is more attractive than Nu Holdings.

XP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nu Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

XP has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Nu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XP pays 90.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Nu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. XP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

XP quarterly revenues are $349.7M, which are smaller than Nu Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. XP's net income of $213.7M is lower than Nu Holdings's net income of $553.4M. Notably, XP's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.94x while Nu Holdings's PE ratio is 28.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XP is 4.70x versus 6.46x for Nu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oxbridge Re Holdings has a net margin of 61.12% compared to XP's net margin of -142.93%. XP's return on equity of 21.58% beat Oxbridge Re Holdings's return on equity of -79.13%.

XP has a consensus price target of $21.78, signalling upside risk potential of 78.69%. On the other hand Oxbridge Re Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 115.19%. Given that Oxbridge Re Holdings has higher upside potential than XP, analysts believe Oxbridge Re Holdings is more attractive than XP.

XP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oxbridge Re Holdings has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.029%.

XP has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Oxbridge Re Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XP pays 90.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Oxbridge Re Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. XP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

XP quarterly revenues are $349.7M, which are larger than Oxbridge Re Holdings quarterly revenues of $205K. XP's net income of $213.7M is higher than Oxbridge Re Holdings's net income of -$293K. Notably, XP's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.94x while Oxbridge Re Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XP is 4.70x versus -- for Oxbridge Re Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patria Investments has a net margin of 61.12% compared to XP's net margin of 1.92%. XP's return on equity of 21.58% beat Patria Investments's return on equity of 13.05%.

XP has a consensus price target of $21.78, signalling upside risk potential of 78.69%. On the other hand Patria Investments has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.49%. Given that XP has higher upside potential than Patria Investments, analysts believe XP is more attractive than Patria Investments.

XP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

XP has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Patria Investments offers a yield of 7.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. XP pays 90.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Patria Investments pays out 122.59% of its earnings as a dividend. XP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Patria Investments's is not.

XP quarterly revenues are $349.7M, which are larger than Patria Investments quarterly revenues of $78M. XP's net income of $213.7M is higher than Patria Investments's net income of $1.5M. Notably, XP's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.94x while Patria Investments's PE ratio is 26.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XP is 4.70x versus 5.29x for Patria Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.